Volume 6, Issue 3 (Summer 2017)
J Occup Health Epidemiol 2017, 6(3): 144-149 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Student Research Committe, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3- Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , rismanchian@hlth.mui.ac.ir
2- Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Student Research Committe, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3- Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , rismanchian@hlth.mui.ac.ir
Article history
Received: 2017/08/21
Accepted: 2017/09/16
ePublished: 2017/11/21
Accepted: 2017/09/16
ePublished: 2017/11/21
Subject:
Occupational Health
Abstract: (7183 Views)
Background: Hazardous chemical agents in the welding operation are a mixture of metal fumes and toxic gases, the inhalation of which causes adverse health effects among welders. The emission of gases in the workplace is a logical cause for concern regarding the potential development of respiratory disease. The aim of the present study was to determine the concentration values of gases discharged during arc welding and perform risk assessment through semi-quantitative chemical risk assessment (SQCRA) method.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in an Iranian steel mill on the 3 processes of plasma arc welding (PAW), submerged arc welding (SAW), and gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW). Direct reading instruments were used for sampling of carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen monoxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3). SQCRA method was used for risk assessment of gases.
Results: The concentrations of O3 (0.356 ppm), CO (41.642 ppm), NO (6.357 ppm), and NO2 (4.871 ppm) were found to exceed their threshold limit values (TLVs), while the concentrations of CO2 (3879.285 ppm) were below its TLV. The maximum exposure concentration of all gases, except CO2, was observed in SAW. SQCRA method showed that among the gases, the highest and least risk rating was related to ozone and nitrogen monoxide, respectively. The risk rating for CO2, CO, and NO2 was low, high, and very high, respectively.
Conclusions: In this study, exposure values were higher than the threshold limit values-time weighted average (TLV-TWA) and the results of risk assessment showed that control engineering should be applied and the use of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) should be made mandatory for welders especially in SAW, PAW, and GTAW processes.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in an Iranian steel mill on the 3 processes of plasma arc welding (PAW), submerged arc welding (SAW), and gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW). Direct reading instruments were used for sampling of carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen monoxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3). SQCRA method was used for risk assessment of gases.
Results: The concentrations of O3 (0.356 ppm), CO (41.642 ppm), NO (6.357 ppm), and NO2 (4.871 ppm) were found to exceed their threshold limit values (TLVs), while the concentrations of CO2 (3879.285 ppm) were below its TLV. The maximum exposure concentration of all gases, except CO2, was observed in SAW. SQCRA method showed that among the gases, the highest and least risk rating was related to ozone and nitrogen monoxide, respectively. The risk rating for CO2, CO, and NO2 was low, high, and very high, respectively.
Conclusions: In this study, exposure values were higher than the threshold limit values-time weighted average (TLV-TWA) and the results of risk assessment showed that control engineering should be applied and the use of respiratory protective equipment (RPE) should be made mandatory for welders especially in SAW, PAW, and GTAW processes.
References
1. Flynn MR, Susi P. Neurological risks associated with manganese exposure from welding operations – a literature review. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2009; 212(5):459-69. [PubMed]
2. Keane MJ, Siert A, Chen BT, Stone SG. Profiling mild steel welding processes to reduce fume emissions and costs in the workplace. Ann Occup Hyg 2014; 58(4):403-12. [PubMed]
3. Popović O, Prokić-Cvetković R, Burzić M, Lukić U, Beljić B. Fume and gas emission during arc welding: hazards and recommendation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014; 37:509-16. [Article]
4. Zamanian Z, Mehrifar Y. Study health and safety workplace in small and medium size enterprises (HSW-SMEs) in Iran. Journal Occupational Health and Epidemiology 2016; 5 (2):112-20. [Article]
5. Antonini JM. Health effects of welding. Crit Rev Toxicol 2003; 33(1):61-103. [Article]
6. Karimi Zeverdegani S, Barakat S, Yazdi M. Chemical risk assessment in a chemical laboratory based on three different techniques. Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology 2016; 5(3):168-75. [Article]
7. Pesch B, Weiss T, Kendzia B, Henry J, Lehnert M, Lotz A, et al. Levels and predictors of airborne and internal exposure to manganese and iron among welders. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2012; 22(3):291-8. [PubMed]
8. Ferreira M. Exposure of welders to manganese in welding fumes [MSc thesis]. Potchefstroom, Mahikeng and Vanderbijlpark, South Africa: North-West University; 2012. [Thesis]
9. Persoons R, Arnoux D, Monssu T, Culié O, Roche G, Duffaud B, et al. Determinants of occupational exposure to metals by gas metal arc welding and risk management measures: A biomonitoring study. Toxicol Lett 2014; 231(2):135-41. [PubMed]
10. Hoet P, Vanmarcke E, Geens T, Deumer G, Haufroid V, Roels HA. Manganese in plasma: a promising biomarker of exposure to Mn in welders. A pilot study. Toxicol Lett 2012; 213(1):69-74. [PubMed]
11. Liu HH, Wu YC, Chen HL. Production of ozone and reactive oxygen species after welding. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2007; 53(4):513-8. [PubMed]
12. Churg A. Interactions of exogenous or evoked agents and particles: the role of reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med 2003; 34(10):1230-5. [PubMed]
13. Cheng TJ, Kao HP, Chan CC, Chang WP. Effects of ozone on DNA single-strand breaks and 8-oxoguanine formation in A549 cells. Environ Res 2003; 93(3):279-84. [PubMed]
14. Saito H, Ojima J, Takaya M, Iwasaki T, Hisanaga N, Tanaka S, et al. Laboratory measurement of hazardous fumes and gases at a point corresponding to breathing zone of welder during a CO2 arc welding. Ind Health 2000; 38(1):69-78. [PubMed]
15. Kiesgen de_Richter R, Ming T, Caillol S. Fighting global warming by photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using giant photocatalytic reactors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013; 19:82-106. [Article]
16. Ayyagari VN, Januszkiewicz A, Nath J. Pro-inflammatory responses of human bronchial epithelial cells to acute nitrogen dioxide exposure. Toxicology 2004; 197(2):149-64. [PubMed]
17. Papi A, Amadesi S, Chitano P, Boschetto P, Ciaccia A, Geppetti P, et al. Bronchopulmonary inflammation and airway smooth muscle hyperresponsiveness induced by nitrogen dioxide in guinea pigs. Eur J Pharmacol 1999; 374(2):241-7. [PubMed]
18. Safe Work Australia. Comparison of workers' compensation arrangements in Australia and New Zealand 2012. Australia–New Zealand: Safe Work Australia; 2012. Available from: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/comparison-workers-compensation-arrangements-australia-and-new-zealand-2012
19. Curran CP, Park RM, Ho SM, Haynes EN. Incorporating genetics and genomics in risk assessment for inhaled manganese: from data to policy. Neurotoxicology 2009; 30(5):754-60. [PubMed]
20. Golbabaei F, Hassani H, Ghahri A, Mirghani S, Arefian S, Khadem M, et al. Risk assessment of exposure to gases released by welding processes in Iranian natural gas transmission pipelines industry. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene 2012; 4(1):6-9. [Article]
21. Brand P, Bertram J, Chaker A, Jörres RA, Kronseder A, Kraus T, et al. Biological effects of inhaled nitrogen dioxide in healthy human subjects. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016; 89(6):1017-24. [PubMed]
22. Schoonover T, Conroy L, Lacey S, Plavka J. Personal exposure to metal fume, NO2, and O3 among production welders and non-welders. Ind Health 2011; 49(1):63-72. [PubMed]
23. Antonini JM, Lewis AB, Roberts JR, Whaley DA. Pulmonary effects of welding fumes: review of worker and experimental animal studies. Am J Ind Med 2003; 43(4):350-60. [PubMed]
24. Karimi A, Jamshidi Slukloei HR, Eslamizad S. Designing SQCRA as a software to semi-quantitative chemical risk assessment in workplace. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering 2014; 1(2):47-56. [Article]
25. Scott JL, Kraemer DG, Keller RJ. Occupational hazards of carbon dioxide exposure. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 2009; 16(2):18-22. [Article]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |