Occupational noise exposure among
the workers of Kerman Cement Plant, 2009
Ghotbi Ravandi MR, PhD 1, Nadri F, MSc 2,
Khanjani N, PhD 3 *, Ahmadian M, MSc 4
1- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Kerman University
of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. 2- Master of Occupational Health, School of
Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. 3- Assistant Prof. Dept. Epidemiology and Statistics, Kerman University of Medical
Sciences, Kerman, Iran. 4. Faculty member, Social development & Health promotion Research Center,
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Abstract Received: August 2011, Accepted:
November 2011
Background: The sound is an environmental and occupational
pollutant and can cause a number of reactions in human body, in which hearing
loss is one of the most important effects. Cement industry is one of the
industries with noise induced hazards. The aim of this study was to evaluate
the noise level in different parts of Kerman Cement Plant. Materials
and Methods: This descriptive
cross-sectional study was done in Kerman Cement Plant in 2009. The sound
level was measured according to the standard ISO 9612:1997 (E) in workers
main commuting spots. Noise levels were measured by the testo SLM device
(Model CEL-815) in network A and calibrator model IEC942/90 claa2. Data were
analyzed by the EXCEL software. Results: The highest sound pressure
level in the Cement Plant (106 db) was recorded in the stone crushing
units and the grinding units (mills); 14 units
had a mean sound level above the permissible 85 db noise level. Conclusion: There are specific units with high noise exposure in the
Kerman Cement plant. Thus systematic noise evaluation in the working units,
worker education, noise control, distributing proper standard noise
protection equipment among the workers, performing annual audiometries, and
evaluating and updating noise control programs are necessary. |
Key Words: Cement Plant, Noise level, Noise
Pollution, Kerman
Introduction
High noise levels have been
recognized as a threat to the human health for many centuries. In the past only
a small group of people were exposed to the harmful effects of noise, but after
world war II due to rapid industrialization and the increase in noise producing
sources worldwide, ordinary people also became exposed to the harmful effects
of high noise levels [1]. High occupational noise
exposure is still an essential health hazard worldwide; for example, in the USA
more than 30 million workers are exposed to dangerous noise levels. Also in
Germany 4 to 5 million people (12 to 15% of the [*]workforce) are exposed to noises which are classified dangerous by the WHO [2]. In America more than 5 million
workers are exposed to noises higher than 85 db in their working environments [3]. The negative effects of noise
on humans include physiological and psychological effects; the most important
physiological effect of noise on the human body is hearing loss [4]. Its physiological effects are
more prevalent than the psychological effects which are stress, anger,
distraction, lack of concentration and decreased cognition [5]. Among the other physiological
effects of noise on human is the increased blood pressure [6, 7] and eventually cardiovascular
diseases which account for a high percentage of work related diseases [8]. Noise is a factor for inducing
stress related reactions. Stress increases the probability of cardiovascular
diseases. In some studies, noise has been classified as the second external
factor for coronary artery diseases after smoking [9, 10].
The cement plant is one of the
noisiest working environments. Several studies in Iran [11-13] and other countries [14, 15] have reported high noise
exposure in different industries, however few [14] have focused on cement
factories. The harmful effects of noise depend on the type of industry, the
plant section and the exposure intensity, and duration of the workers’ shifts [7]. Kerman Cement plant is located
approximately 15 km, on the south west of Kerman, a city in the south east of
Iran [16]. The plant is located on the way
to Bandar Abbas and is one of the main cement exporters of the Persian Gulf
region. This plant was launched on August 3, 1967 [17].
In this plant raw materials,
which consist mainly of lime-stone, silica, alumina and iron materials, after
complete grinding and mixing, are heated up to 1600°C in a rotary kiln to
produce cement [16]. This factory has three
production lines, Which produces more than 3500 tons cement per day. The
products of this plant are type 1 cement (natural pozzolan), type 2 (Portland),
type 5 (Portland), HSR and G class (used for oil expeditions) [17]. This plant has employed more
than 900 people of which less than 400 are working in the noisy units. The cement manufacturing process consists of
four processing steps: crushing of raw materials, grinding of raw materials,
pyroprocessing, and grinding of clinker and packing. The whole process is associated
with high noise levels due to the striking, loading and transportation of the
rocks, clinker and steel balls, the traction systems of the mills and the fans
and blowers for the transport of gasses and materials [18]. The aim of this study was to measure the average noise
pollution in different parts of Kerman Cement Plant. The measurements will help
us to estimate the average noise exposure of workers in the different units of
this industry. It will also provide the essential data for spatial noise
mapping and planning efficient noise control and hearing protection programs in
different units of this factory. The data can also be used for forecasting and
planning control programs in the newly established cement factorie, in which
sufficient data has not yet been accumulated for action.
Materials and Methods
This study was a descriptive cross-sectional
study done in Kerman Cement Plant in 2009. The map of different parts of the
plant was inquired and the stations for noise measurement were selected from
the places which workers used to stop or commute more than other places. the
selection and measurement of noise in all units of the cement plant was done
according to ISO 9612:1997(E).
The level of noise was measured by an
occupational health specialist who was familiar with the measuring device
instructions and the study protocol. All measurements were done during morning
work hours (from 6 am to 2 pm) in which the maximum number of workers were
working, and all of the noise producing equipment were operating. The noise
produced in different units was different and depended on the unit’s surface (m2),
number of operating
equipment, number of people working and the
type of work. The number of our measurements depended on the unit’s surface,
and more measurements were done in larger halls. The factory units, number of
people working and the db in each measuring station was recorded. Noise was
measured in a sum of 224 measurement stations. In each station at least 3
measurements were done and the logarithmic mean for each station was
determined. In this Factory, workers work in 8 hour shifts and the sum of noise
exposure in each shift is about 6 hours. In order to measure noise levels, the
testo SLM devise (model CEL-815) in the A network was used and for calibrating
it the calibrator model Testo IEC942/90 claa2 was used.
For measuring noise, the noise meter microphone
had at least one meter distance from reflective surfaces such as walls or
machinery and its distance from the floor was about 5 feet or 1.5 meters. Data
about noise levels were gathered in each unit, and the logarithmic means were
calculated for each unit. The statistical analysis was done by EXCEL software
and the units that had noise levels higher than the standard threshold (85db)
were determined.
Results
The map and the measurements in one of the
working halls as a sample has been shown in figure 1.
Figure1:
the noise measurement stations of one working hall
Table 1: The
noisy units of Kerman Cement Factory, the mean, maximum and minimum of noise
measured (db) and number of workers in each unit.
Unit name |
Mean±SD (db) |
Min - Max (db) |
Number of workers |
No. of noise measurement
stations |
Raw material mill |
100.1 ± 1.3 * |
98 - 102 |
22 |
16 |
Cement mill |
99.4 ± 1.6 * |
96 - 102 |
30 |
16 |
Gypsum mill |
99.4 ± 1.6 * |
96 - 102 |
3 |
16 |
Iron ore mill |
100.1 ± 1.3 * |
98 - 102 |
3 |
16 |
Crusher |
103.5 ± 1.3 * |
102 - 106 |
8 |
10 |
Preheater |
80 ± 0.9 |
79-81 |
6 |
6 |
Furnaces |
94 ± 8.8 * |
84 - 106 |
31 |
8 |
Prefurnace group repair |
84.3 ± 4.7 |
77 - 92 |
18 |
6 |
Soil silo |
80.8 ± 1.3 |
79 - 82 |
5 |
4 |
Klinger storage |
84.1 ± 3.5 |
79 - 88 |
3 |
4 |
Tonnage house |
82 ± 3.7 |
78 - 88 |
3 |
4 |
Repair of tonnage house |
93 ± 5.8 * |
86 - 105 |
14 |
6 |
Operations group |
76.6 ± 3.4 |
72 - 82 |
26 |
6 |
Building Department |
81 ± 4.2 |
75 - 86 |
15 |
6 |
Laboratory group |
74.4 ± 3 |
70 - 78 |
21 |
8 |
Power (Electricity) |
81 ± 6 |
72 - 88 |
68 |
6 |
Electrostatic Filter |
98.4 ± 1.5 * |
97 - 101 |
12 |
4 |
Casting |
89.7 ± 3.9 * |
85 - 95 |
2 |
12 |
Technical Service Group |
91.8 ± 5 * |
86 - 100 |
13 |
6 |
Technical Project Office |
73.2 ± 2.7 |
70 - 77 |
15 |
6 |
Technical Workshop |
88.3 ± 6.5 * |
79 - 105 |
38 |
22 |
Furnace repair group |
78.2 ± 6.1 |
75 - 89 |
13 |
6 |
Mechanics |
86.8 ± 7.7 * |
77 - 101 |
22 |
5 |
Vehicle repair shop |
88.5 ± 7.3 * |
77 - 102 |
8 |
12 |
Power plant |
91.2 ± 6.3 * |
84 - 106 |
12 |
13 |
* Noise
above national recommended level
After collecting the measurements, in all of
these halls the logarithmic average and the standard deviation of noise
intensity were calculated. The results of noise measurement, the number of
people working in each unit and the number of noise measurements done in each
unit have been shown in table 1.
Kerman Cement Plant has a total of 29 units and
the units that have a higher noise level have been shown in table 1. The
results showed that from a total of 29 units operating in the Kerman Cement
Factory, 14 units have noise levels above 85 db which noise control programs
should be executed in them. The range of noise level in different parts of the
plant was from 39 to 106 dBA. As it has been shown in the table 1, among the
units with noise levels, more than 85 db, the iron ore mill, crushing and the
raw material mills had the highest average noise levels.
Discussion
The present study showed that the Cement Plant
due to its high noise exposure is among the hazardous industries and noise
exposure in some parts of Kerman plant has reached dangerous levels of up to
106 db. According to the safety standards in this high noise intensity, the
exposure time should be shortened (Table 2).
Also the necessity of frequent noise
evaluation, machinery control and maintenance in the working environments
should be highlighted. It has been mentioned in numerous sources that noise
intensities
similar to the ones measured in this plant can
lead to hearing loss [19]. According to the estimates of the American
Occupational Health and Safety Institute, from every four workers aged above 55
years and exposed to noise levels above 90 db, one has hearing difficulties.
This institute describes noise induced hearing loss as one of the 10 important
occupation related diseases [19].
A study from a cement plant in Holcin, Croatia
reported that most of the machinery produce noise levels between 67 to 112 db
in one meter distance [18].
Another study conducted by the Workers’ Health
Center of one cement plant in Brazil, showed that noise and temperature were
the most important hazardous exposures in these workers and the noise levels
were up to about 120 db [20]. In our study, the minimum measured noise
level was 39 db and the maximum was 106 db. This higher noise level at the
cement industry in comparison to other industries is probably related to the
work structure and type of operations performed at these factories. Similar
studies from other researchers, such as the study done by Golmohammadi et al
showed that environmental noise levels at the Isfahan Iron Melting Plant were
between 75 to 105 dBA [12].
In another study of construction industry the
average measured noise levels in a cement mason were 79.3 dBA and more than
half of the measurements were above the 85 dBA standard threshold and in 10
cases it was more than 90 db [21]. Bostani et al studies done in 23 functional
units of the Abadan Oil Refinery showed that the minimum average noise exposure
in these units was 83 db and the maximum was 102.1 db [11] and Jahangiri and Adl’s study in the Imax Unit
of the Tehran Oil Refinery showed that the noise level in this unit is higher
than the standard recommended level (85 db) [22]. In another study about the noise exposure of
construction workers, results showed that the noise exposure in this occupation
is also at a level that can cause harmful effects for the workers hearing and
had reached about 87 db. In this study out of 60 construction workers whom did
an audiometery, 45 workers used ear muffs during work, but the hearing loss
detected in workers showed that the hearing protection program was not
efficient [23].
There are also studies that show the hearing
protection gear used in some industries is not efficient either [11]. Therefore, it is essential to have
occupational hygienists’ supervision over choosing and correct using of hearing
protection equipments in different industries. Other studies measuring noise
levels in cement factories and evaluating the workers hearing loss in these
factories have shown that 55% of the workers had levels of noise induced
hearing loss [14]. In our study among the units with noise
levels more than 85 db, the iron ore mill, crushing and the raw material mill
had the highest average noise levels. Because of the high number of workers
that operate in units with high noise pollution (table 1); noise control, the
use of personal hearing protection equipment, reduction in working times and
other preventive strategies are necessary in Kerman Cement Plant.
The time restrains that should be applied
accordingly in case of high noise levels based on international standards has
been shown in table 2. Kerman Cement Factory is one of the major Iranian
industries with high industrial hygiene standards. All of the workers in the
noisy industrial units are equipped with ear plugs, and are screened annually
for work related disease and hearing loss. Nevertheless, the factory’s privacy
regulations did not allow us to access workers’ health files.
Table2:
The standard duration of noise exposure according to National and ACGIH
Standards
Noise Intensity |
Duration of Exposure |
82 db |
16 hours |
85 db |
8 hours |
88 db |
4 hours |
91 db |
2 hours |
94 db |
1 hour |
97 db |
30 min |
100 db |
15 min |
103 db |
7.5 min |
106 db |
3.75 min |
Another study stated that among the units in a
cement factory the coal mill, Kiln/Raw mill, packers of cement plant and DG
sets had the highest noise production [24].
The noise pollution control measures proposed
for cement plants are provision of acoustic dampeners in foundations and
insulators in the interiors, encasement of noise generating equipment,
development of a thick greenbelt all around the plant boundary to act as a
noise attenuator, providing ear muffs to personnel working near high noise
levels, providing suitable acoustic barriers around areas generating high
noise, and effective preventive maintenance and vibration measurements of all
rotating equipments [24]. Application of noise mapping techniques in
complex industrial environments such as the cement plant shows that with
reliable acoustic and spatial data, proper noise map and action planning can be
calculated. Obviously, without acoustic measurements or reliable databases it
is not possible to noise map the industrial source [18].
All hearing protection devices should be
labeled with a Noise Reduction Rating, which is an estimate of how much noise
the protector will block. Typically, this level should be about two times
higher than the protection most workers experience in actual use [21].
Conclusion
According to the results of this study and
other studies, the cement plant is one of the industries with high noise
exposure and a multiple step noise control program including noise evaluation,
worker education, engineering strategies for noise reduction, determining the
hazardous zones, distributing standard hearing protection devices, annual
audiometries and evaluation and revision of noise control programs should be
implemented.
Acknowledgement
This study was approved by the Environmental
Medical Research Committee and was supported by a grant from the Deputy of
Research, Kerman Medical University. The authors acknowledge Kerman Cement
Plant for its full cooperation in conducting this study.
Conflict of interest: Non declared
References
1. Celik O,
Yalcin S, Ozturk A. Hearing parameters in noise exposed industrial workers.
Auris Nasus Larynx 1998; 25(4):369-75.
2. Concha-Barrientos M, Campbell-Lendrum D, Steenland K.
Occupational noise: assessing the burden of diseases from work-related hearing
impairment at national and local levels.
Protection of the Human Environment. Geneva: World Health Organization
2004.
3. Dobie RA. Industrial audiometry and the otologist. Laryngoscope
1985; 95(4):382-5.
4. Melamed S, Fried Y, Froom P. The interactive effect of chronic
exposure to noise and job complexity on changes in blood pressure and job
satisfaction: a longitudunal study of industrial employees. J Occup Health
Psychol 2001; 6(3):182-95.
5. Atmaca E, Peker I, Altin A. Industrial noise and its effects on
humans. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2005; 14(6):721-6.
6. Brattico E, Kujala T, Tervaniemi M, Alku P,
Ambrosi L, Monitilloe V. Long-term exposure to
occupational noise alters the cortical orginization of sound processing. Clin
Neurophysiol 2005; 116(1):190-203.
7. Iyawe VI, Ebomoyi IE, Chiwuzie JC, Alakija W. Some factors
which may affect blood pressure in Nigerian cement factory workers. Afr J
Biomed Res 2000; 3:117-21.
8. Price AE. Heart disease and work. Heart 2004; 90(9):1077-84.
9. Ising H, Babisch w, Gunther T. Work noise as a risk factor in
myocardial infarction. Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology 1992;
2(1):64-8.
10. Hilt BMD, Romyhr TQO.
Morbidity from ischemic heart disease in workers at a stainless steel welding
factory. Nor Epidemiol 1999; 9(1):21-6.
11. Bostani MR, Mazarei R. Noise pollution and its control in the
Abadan refinery. Presented at the first national noise conference, Mashhad,
Iran, February 21- 22, 2004. [Persian].
12. Golmohammadi R, Zamanparvar A, Khalili SA. The relation between
noise and hearning loss in the workers of Esfahan Iron Melting Factory. Journal
of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences 2001; 8:35-8. [Persian]
13. Halvani GH, Zare M, Barkhordari A. Noise induced hearing loss
among textile workers of Taban factories in Yazd. The Scientific Journal of
Birjand Medical School 2009; 4(15(series 37)):69-74. [Persian]
14. Hernandez-Gaytan SI, Santos-Burgoa C, Becker-Meyer JP,
Macias-Carrillo C, Lopez-Cervantes M. Prevalence of hearing loss and correlated
factors in cement plant. Salud Publica Mex 2000; 42(2):106-11.
15. Neitzel R, Seixas N. The effectiveness of hearing protection
among construction workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005; 2(4):227-38.
16. Baroutian S, Mohebbi A, Soltani Goharrizi AS.
Measuring and modeling particulate dispersion: a case study of Kerman Cement
Plant. J Hazard Mater 2006; 136(3):468-74.
17. History of the Kerman Cement Plant. Kerman Cement Industries
Inc.; 2011 [updated 2011; cited Oct 7, 2011]; Available from: www.kermancement.com.
18. Stimac A. The application of the noise mapping technique in the
comples industrial environment.
Presented at the second congress of Alps-Adria Acoustics Association and
the first congress of Acoustical Society of Croatia, Acoustical Society of
Croatia, Opatija, Croatia, June 23-24, 2005. p 195-202.
19. Aghilinezhad M Mostafaei M (2000). Occupational Medicine and
Occupational Diseases. 2nd ed. Tehran: Arjomand Publications.
20. Quiros L, Gonzalez Webb A. Assessment of cement dust
concentrations and noise levels in a cement plant in Nicaragua: School of
Public Health, UCB; 2005.
21. Construction Industry Noise Exposures, Cement Masons: Department
of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health and
Community Medicine, University of Washington; 2004.
22. Jahangiri M, Adl J. Human errors made from the interaction of
noise and human reactions in the isomax unit of Tehran refinery. Presented at
the the first national noise conference, Mashhad, Iran, February 21-22, 2004;.
23. Marcos D, Quintana FS, Chavarra N, Ballesteros JA. Noise exposure
of workers of the construction sector. Applied Acoustics. 2009; 70:753-60.
24. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd, Executive Summary of proposed cement
plant (Clinker production: 2.05 MTPA, Cement production: 2.54 MTPA) at Baga
Village, Arki Tahsil, Solan District, Himachal Pradesh; 2004.
[*] Corresponding Author: Naeges Khanjani, Dept. Epidemiology and Statistics, Kerman University of Medical
Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Email: n_khanjani@kmu.ac.ir