Quality
requirements based on physicians’
and nurses’ point of view and quality dimensions based on patients’ point of
view in some Iranian hospitals in 2014-2015
Bahrami Nejad Z, MSc1*, Salajegheh
S, PhD2, Sheikhi A, PhD2
1-
Phd Student, Dept of. Public Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic
Azad University, Kerman, Iran. 2- Assistant Prof., Dept
of. Public Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
Abstract
Received:
March 2016, Accepted:
June 2016
Background: Determining quality requirements and quality
dimensions is one of the most reliable ways of providing high quality
services. The objective of the present study was to investigate the association between
quality requirements and quality dimensions according to the points of view
of physicians, nurses, and patients. Materials
and Methods: This descriptive study was carried out in hospitals
under supervision of Medical Sciences Universities, in 4 provinces of Tehran,
Fars, Lorestan, and Yazd (Iran). A group of 432 physicians and nurses
answered the Quality Requirements Questionnaire which includes the 4
components of competitive, ethical, professional, and accountability
requirements. Furthermore, 500 patients answered the Quality Dimensions
Questionnaire, including the 11 dimensions of security (safety),
professionalism, empathy (friendship), politeness, reliability,
accountability, working speed, competency, accessibility, flexibility, and
tangibles. The Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple
regression method were used to analyze the data in SPSS software. Results: The mean quality requirements
and quality dimensions scores in the studied hospitals were, respectively,
3.75 and 3.61, both of which were at a higher than medium level. Moreover,
the results of Pearson correlation coefficient suggested that the
competitive, professional, and ethical components of quality requirement had
a significant and direct association with quality dimensions. However, there
was no significant association between the accountability component and
quality dimensions variables. Furthermore, based on the results of multiple
regression and the determination coefficient, it is possible to claim that
approximately 13% of variance in quality dimensions depend upon the mean of
components of quality requirements. Conclusions: It can be concluded that work
commitment, attention to work, respect for ethical principles, and fair
competition at the work place between physicians and nurses lead to the
provision of safe and high quality services in hospitals. |
Keywords: Service,
Quality, Requirements, Dimensions, Physicians, Nurses.
Introduction
Quality is an intricate notion
that includes various dimensions and is hard to define because of its implicit Criticisms. Among the
different viewpoints toward the notion of quality, customer-centric products
and services are the most useful (1). Quality of services is a key factor of
organizational growth, achievement, and consistency (2). Thus, successful organizations are those
which meet environmental demands (3) and surpass competitors in providing
services to clients, especially in* medical healthcare sectors, in which client
satisfaction is recognized as a
Basic factor of organizational performance (4, 5). Patients’
satisfaction is important as it is the cause of their contribution to
healthcare processes (6). The necessary tools to achieve this advantage are
considered to be complete commitment to customers and adequate knowledge of
quality requirements (7). The 4 quality requirements (competitive,
accountability, professional, and ethical requirement) are considered as
inspirations and incentives that challenge any organization that seeks to
actively comply with quality standards. To concentrate on customers’ needs,
which forms the core concept of quality, is one of the most effective tools of
competition and constancy (competitive requirement) (8). Moreover,
accountability requirement refers to employees’ responsibility or
accountability towards the services they deliver (9). The component of
professional requirement refers to the commitment to meet customers’ demands
through applying the most suitable operation. Finally, the ethical requirement
highlights the fact that customers and clients deserve services with the
highest quality (8).
To provide high quality services in order to achieve
customers’ satisfaction, it is necessary to recognize quality dimensions of
services, importance of every single dimension for customers, and evaluate
customers’ expectations regarding each dimension (10). Service quality is
recognized as a fundamental factor for organizational development and
achievement and it is considered as an effective, strategic, and pervasive issue in organizations’
management agenda (11).
Service quality dimensions in
the present study include:
-
Safety: High safety and
security of product and services
-
Politeness: Employees’ good
behavior in dealing with customers (12)
-
Reliability: Bailment, faith,
and accuracy in providing services (9)
-
Accountability: Employees’
tendency to help customers and provide fast services (10)
-
Speed: Providing suitable and
correct services as fast as possible (9)
-
Competency: Level of skills,
expertise, and professionalism in providing services (13)
-
Access: Easy access to
employees plus customers’ easy and fast access to services (12)
-
Flexibility: Capacity of an
organization in terms of adaptation to internal changes and requirements
-
Tangibles and appearances:
Equipment, physical facilities, employees, and well-ordered documents (14)
-
Empathy: Organization’s and
individuals’ attention to customers (10)
-
Professionalism: Staffs’ high
abilities and skills in performing tasks in the best possible way (12)
The main goal of service providers
is to deliver satisfactory, affordable, and scientifically standardized
services by means of appropriate methods and in the shortest possible time
(15). A variety of studies on measuring the quality of services in hospitals as
well as patients’ satisfaction with hospital care services have reported the
existence of many challenges and defects in this area (16).
Since the main function of
hospitals is to present high quality care and services to patients and meet
their needs and expectations, the concept of quality needs to be internalized
in the hospital framework (17). Despite the high value of healthcare services,
services delivered by this sector have led to public dissatisfaction in many
cases (16, 18). It seems possible to improve the services provision process and
highly increase customers’ satisfaction, as a pivotal factor of competition in
this area, through determining Effectiveness of quality
in the healthcare sector and ensuring of the quality of services through
assessing their effectiveness level (19). The necessity of this research for the role and the
critical importance of hospitals, community health and health development in
the country.
Therefore, evaluation of
hospitals’ performance in order to enrich service quality in addition to
preventing disease outbreaks is inevitable. Moreover, conducting more detailed
and scientific investigations in the healthcare sectors are essential to
improving the quality of medical services in the country and meeting the
publics’ expectations. The main goal of medical healthcare providers is to
present affordable high quality services with scientific standards and in the
shortest possible time.
Moreover, the concept of
quality is of grave importance in healthcare systems due to the destructive
consequences of providing poor quality services such as increasing diseases,
disabilities, and costs and decreasing customers’ trust. Thus, the objective of
the present study was to investigate the association between quality
requirements and quality dimensions according to the points of view of
physicians, nurses, and patients.
Material and Methods
This descriptive study started in the first half of 2014
and finished in the first half of 2015 and was carried out in hospitals under
supervision of Medical Sciences Universities of 4 provinces of Iran. Table 1
presents details of the subjects selected from each province. The study also
used Edward’s model (1990) to design the quality requirements variable plus a
combination of the 3 models of Grenroos (1988), Johnstone (1995), and
Parasuraman (1988) to design the quality dimensions variable. The multistage
cluster sampling method was applied for selecting provinces and hospitals and
random simple sampling method was used for selecting hospital staff and
customers. The subjects were chosen from hospitals of the 4 provinces of
Tehran, Fars, Lorestan, and Yazd (Iran). The subjects were divided into 2
groups of staff and clients. The number of subjects in the first group was
determined as 432 personnel of hospitals using Cochran formula. The number of
subjects in the second group was considered as infinite number of clients of
hospitals, but in order to establish congruence between the two groups, the
number of subjects in the second group was determined as 500 clients (Table 1).
Table
1: Statistical population and number of samples in the
hospitals under supervision of Medical Sciences Universities
No |
Province name |
Number of hospitals |
Number of staff |
Subjects |
1 |
Tehran |
95 |
9344 |
271 |
2 |
Fars |
41 |
3452 |
101 |
3 |
Lorestan |
14 |
1160 |
34 |
4 |
Yazd |
12 |
811 |
26 |
Total |
4 |
162 |
14767 |
432 |
The reliability and validity of
each questionnaire was confirmed. The Quality Requirements Questionnaire
consists of the 4 components of competitive, accountability, professional, and
ethical requirements. It is composed of 20 multiple-choice questions scored
based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from completely agree to completely
disagree. The Quality Dimensions Questionnaire includes the 11 dimensions of
safety, professionalism, empathy (friendship), politeness, reliability,
accountability, working speed, competency, accessibility, flexibility, and
tangibles or appearances. The questionnaire is composed of 52 multiple-choices
questions scored based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from completely agree
to completely disagree (Table 2).
Table 2:
Components of quality dimension and quality requirements and their indexes
Variable |
Dimensions |
Indexes
(questionnaire contains) |
Quality
requirements |
Competitive
requirement |
-
Meeting
customers’ need in order to appear as a premier employee -
Providing
better services in order to obtain higher ranks -
Treating
customers appropriately in order to obtain higher evaluation score -
having a
sense of competition at work -
Trying the
best in order to not lose the sense of competition -
Trying the
best in order to improve the organization’s rank |
Accountability
requirement |
-
Answering
customers questions -
Respecting
and honoring customers -
Performing
tasks based on specified standards -
Feeling
responsible toward providing services -
Having a good
relationship with customers due to high motivation |
|
Professional
requirement |
-
Employees’
respecting each other -
Employees’
paying special attention to customers -
Increasing
employees’ scientific knowledge -
Educating
employees to provide better services -
Increasing
employees’ knowledge and skills |
|
Ethical
requirement |
-
Respecting
customers as a moral obligation -
Observing
organization’s code of ethics -
Serving
customers due to the belief of being superior among all creatures -
Considering
morals when presenting service to customers |
|
Quality
dimensions |
Tangibles |
-
Having an
appropriate and ideal work environment -
Having
modern facilities and equipment -
Employees’
fine appearance matching the work environment -
Arranging
furniture and tools suitable for an office |
Reliability |
-
Giving
correct answers to customers -
Presenting
appropriate information to customers -
Presenting
on time services -
Updating of
services by managers -
Employees
acting as trustees |
|
Accessibility |
-
Installing
sufficient information boards and other signs for presenting services -
Easy and
fast accessibility to services -
Providing
the requested services on customer’s first referral |
|
Competency |
-
Employees’
sufficient skills for performing tasks -
Employees’
expertise in the field of work -
Employees’
ability to perform tasks with high accuracy and Accuracy -
Matching
tasks with employees skills -
Employees’
concentration on main tasks and responsibilities -
Employees’
capability of proposing solutions for problems (Troubleshooting ability) |
|
Accountability |
-
Customer’s
easy access to updated information related to services -
Answering
customers in the shortest time possible -
Employee’s
eagerness to answer customers -
Employees’
feeling responsible toward customers’ feedback |
|
Work speed |
-
Employees’
performance of tasks in the shortest time possible -
Paying
enough attention to accuracy of tasks -
Applying
new technologies -
Avoiding Repeating Tasks |
|
Flexibility |
-
Employees’
non-resistance to organizational changes -
Employee’s
capability of performing various tasks -
Synchronous
checking of management’s requests -
Employees’
patience toward and acceptance of changes -
Employee’s
various skills to encompass the changing needs of the organization |
|
Security |
-
Employees’
sufficient knowledge for answering customers -
Employees’
capability to work and use new technologies -
Customer’s
trust in employees for receiving services -
Customers’
gradual trust in the organization due to appropriate behavior of employees |
|
Empathy |
-
Paying
attention to individual needs and requests -
Caring for customers
equally -
Defining
working time suitable for customers -
Employees’
personal attention to customers |
|
Professionalism |
-
Distinguishing
essential from non-essential tasks -
Using
scientific criterions in decision-making -
Being aware
of necessary performances -
Being
skilled and capable of performing tasks -
Applying
new methods in performing tasks -
Using all
individual skills and capabilities -
Performing
tasks with the highest rate of accuracy and lowest rate of mistakes |
|
Politeness |
-
Being
polite when performing tasks -
Behaving in
a friendly manner toward customers -
Trying to
solve customer’s problems -
Trying to
shorten customers’ waiting time -
Listening
to customers carefully |
Table 3:
Demographic information of physicians and nurses, and customers
Demographic
information |
Physicians and
nurses |
Customers |
|||
N |
Percent |
N |
Percent |
||
Gender |
Man |
292 |
67.9 |
300 |
60.7 |
Woman |
136 |
31.6 |
199 |
39.3 |
|
Unanswered |
4 |
0.5 |
1 |
0 |
|
Marital status |
Married |
307 |
71.4 |
270 |
53.5 |
Single |
117 |
27.2 |
229 |
46.4 |
|
Unanswered |
8 |
0.6 |
1 |
0.2 |
|
Age |
20-30 years old |
18 |
4.2 |
72 |
14.2 |
31-40 years old |
215 |
50.0 |
146 |
28.8 |
|
41-50 years old |
121 |
28.1 |
150 |
30.0 |
|
51 years old and higher |
74 |
17.2 |
130 |
26.8 |
|
Unanswered |
4 |
0.5 |
2 |
0.2 |
Content validity was used to
determine the validity of the questionnaires (Quality Dimensions Questionnaire
= 0.88, and Quality Requirements
Questionnaire = 0.91). To determine the reliability coefficient, Cronbach’s
alpha was used and an alpha of 85.1 and 77.5 was obtained for the Quality
Dimensions Questionnaire and Quality Requirements Questionnaire, respectively.
The first sample group
(physicians and nurses) was composed of 292 men and 136 women (4 people
unknown), and 307 married and 117 single individuals (8 unknown). Moreover, 18
subjects in this group were 20-30 years old, 215 were 31-40 years old, 121 were
41-50 years old, and 74 were 51 years and older (4 unknown). The second sample
group (customers and clients) was composed of 300 men and 199 women (1
unknown), and 270 married and 229 single individuals (1 unknown). In terms of
age range, 72, 146, 150, and 130participants in this group were 20-30, 31-40,
41-50, and 51 years and older, respectively (2 unknown) (Table 3).
In the present study, data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential
statistics. Descriptive data were described using mean, frequency, and
percentage of frequency. For inferential data, the Pearson correlation
coefficient was used to determine the association between
components of quality requirements and quality dimensions. The SPSS software
(version 21, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was applied for analyzing data.
Additionally, the significant level was considered as 0.05.
Results
Based on the results obtained
from the 5- Degree Likert scale, the quality requirements variable with
mean of 3.75 and quality dimensions variable with mean of 3.61 were at a higher
than medium level (table 4).
Table 4:
Explanation of measurements of quality requirement, quality dimensions, and
quality requirements components
Variable/Component |
Mean ± SD |
Median |
Min-Max |
Quality
requirement |
3.751 ± 0.418 |
3.750 |
2.20-4.90 |
Quality
dimensions |
3.613 ± 0.403 |
3.745 |
2.48-4.67 |
Competitive
requirement |
3.427 ± 0.674 |
3.500 |
1.17-5.00 |
Accountability
requirement |
3.849 ± 0.469 |
3.800 |
2.00-5.00 |
Professional
requirement |
3.945 ± 0.596 |
3.800 |
1.40-5.00 |
Ethical
requirement |
3.931 ± 0.672 |
3.750 |
2.00-5.00 |
The association between
variables was investigated using the Pearson correlational coefficient. Based
on P-value (P < 0.05), we can claim that there is a significant and direct
association between quality requirements and quality dimensions. Among the
components of quality requirements, competitive requirement, professional
requirement, and ethical requirement
had direct and significant association with
quality dimensions variable. Nevertheless, no significant association was found
between the component of accountability requirement and quality dimensions
variable (with correlational coefficient of 0.008). Among the components of
quality requirements, professional requirement had the strongest association
with quality dimensions (Table 5).
Table 5: Association between the quality dimension variable and components of
quality requirement
Variable |
Quality
dimensions |
Quality
requirements |
Competitive
requirement |
Accountability
requirement |
Professional
requirement |
Ethical
requirement |
Quality
dimensions |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Quality
requirement |
0.145** |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Competitive
requirement |
0.107* |
0.627** |
1 |
|
|
|
Accountability
requirement |
0.008 |
0.604** |
0.224** |
1 |
|
|
Professional
requirement |
0.131** |
0.723** |
0.116* |
0.355** |
1 |
|
Ethical
requirement |
0.110* |
0.638** |
0.076 |
0.288** |
0.470** |
1 |
*significant level = 0.05; **significant level = 0.01
Moreover, the results achieved
from regression analysis and determination coefficient showed that
approximately 13% of variation in quality dimensions are distinguishable from
quality requirement components (F(4, 418) = 3.631) (P < 0.05). The component
of competitive requirement (Beta = 0.121) (P < 0.05) is a predictor of and
has a significant association with quality dimensions. Based on the partial
correlation coefficient, among quality requirement components, competitive
requirement has the strongest association with quality dimensions (Table 6).
Table 6:
Regression of quality requirements components and quality dimensions
Variable |
B |
S.E |
Beta |
T |
P |
R2 |
Partial correlation |
F |
P |
Fixed |
3.177 |
0.199 |
- |
15.964 |
< 0.001** |
- |
|
|
|
Competitive requirement |
0.074 |
0.031 |
0.121 |
2.432 |
0.015* |
0.118 |
|
|
|
Accountability requirement |
-0.075 |
0.047 |
-0.085 |
-1.592 |
0.112 |
0.134 |
-0.078 |
3.631 |
0.006** |
Professional requirement |
0.070 |
0.041 |
0.096 |
1.639 |
0.091 |
0.083 |
|
|
|
Ethical requirement |
0.049 |
0.034 |
0.080 |
1.449 |
0.148 |
0.071 |
|
|
|
*significant level = 0.05; **significant level = 0.01
Discussion
Professional requirement refers
to have commitment
toward customers needs through using the most appropriate deployment (8). A
better definition for professional requirement is a mechanism through which a
person’s constant and stable behavior emerges (20). Professional relationships
in the medical environment Contains, relationships
between physician and patient , patients’ satisfaction, preserving their
privacy, telling them the truth (honesty), as well as relationship between
physicians and coworkers (21). Professional requirement is a human feature
which can be defined as employees’ heartfelt satisfaction and sense of
responsibility toward specified tasks, such that, in the lack of supervision,
individuals oblige themselves to perform tasks in the best possible way (22).
In recent years, the emphasis
on physicians’ and nurses’ professionalism has been intensively increased,
which means the healthcare system requires physicians and nurses who can have a
successful relationship with their colleagues, and patients and their families
(23). Therefore, one of the most challenging concerns of competent managers in
different levels is how to prepare an appropriate context for the workforce
engaged in all departments to inspire responsibility, ethics, and commitment to
work among them (24). Moreover, ethical requirement includes respecting the
organization’s code of ethics, adhering to moral principles, and considering
the customers that can lead to patients’ satisfaction with the delivered
services. These results are in agreement with those of the study by Salajegheh
and Sistani (25).
Physicians’ and patients’
rights and responsibilities are the main notions of the field of healthcare.
Patient’s place in physician’s system of thought and values is of great
importance and is very effective in adherence to ethical and moral principles.
Occupational conscience and responsibility, the necessary scientific and
practical competency, and lack of patient abuse, both physically and
spiritually, are substantial issues which highlight the importance of medical
mistakes and physicians’ shortcomings (26). Medical mistakes are one of the
basics of medical ethics which has increasingly obtained attention (27).
Training ethics-bound medical experts is considered as a goal and requirement
of medical education in the present era and implement in universities and
scientific centers of the world. there are many arguments around teaching methods of
medical ethics as well as training experts in the area (28) that highlight the
necessity of focusing on ethics and moral values (29).
Experts believe that ethics is
at the heart of suitable medical services and physicians, nurses, and all other
medical personnel must adhere to ethical and basic professional principles that
will be inherently prominent in a therapeutic relationship (30). Ethical
requirement is one of the main components of providing high quality services to
patients. To achieve this goal, employees in different service delivery levels
must establish and arrange their activities and tasks based on common value
principles through which will reveal their commitment and devotion to their job
and society (31).
Experts call an environment
ethical if its quality of work is appropriate. Such an environment can only be
developed when managers trust their employees (32).
Competitive requirement
includes providing better services in order to achieve higher working
positions, have a sense of competition in tasks performance, and to obtain
higher grades in work assessments or evaluations. Medical personnel’s
competition in performing assigned tasks can trigger an increase in quality of
services. In addition, managers also need to play a stronger role in preparing
an appropriate working environment both physically and mentally. Managers’
knowledge of and control on management principals, creating true and suitable
relationships and developing a feeling of trust between staff, commitment and
attachment to the organization, and providing organizational support and
assistance are considered as useful tools for creating a favorable working
environment which is prepared to embrace innovation, creativity, and changes (33).
Knowing how to motivate service
employees in order to increase their performance, and consequently, guarantee
the provision of high quality services for customers can enable the
organization not only to maintain current customers, but also to attract new
customers. Thus, through focusing on quality requirements, quality dimensions
are not difficult to achieve (34).
In this study, the researchers
dealt with some limitations in conducting the research, such as difficulty in
distributing and collecting questionnaires because of the high number of
subjects. Furthermore, convincing the subjects and ensuring them of the
confidentiality of their information and their views about the organization was
another problem.
As public hospitals have a
large number of clients, it is suggested that managers of hospitals and
healthcare centers pay special attention to the quality dimensions of services.
Thus, it is essential for managers to have consideration for their customers
and patients and meet their needs in the shortest time possible through
cooperation with their colleagues when delivering services, have sympathy
toward them, educate and reinforce their personnel’s skills, and paying
attention to patients’ expectations.
Conclusion
The results showed that
physicians and nurses must respect their job and their customers and increase
their knowledge in the performance of their tasks. They should be trained to
provide suitable services, and through respecting ethical principles and
organizational code of ethics, they must be able to deliver a high quality
service as quality is both a scientific and ethical issue. Fair competition
between staff to obtain working opportunities and gain higher positions in the
organization have a pivotal role in providing high quality services. Achieving
this goal requires sufficient knowledge and competency which results in the
provision of a safe service in the sense of patients’ trust in employees’ skills
and expertise.
Acknowledgement
The present study is a research
plan (PhD thesis) approved by the Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University. The
cooperation of the honorable professors of the Department of Management and
School of Management, Mr. Ayub Sheikhi, Mrs. Maryam Naghavi, and Mr. Ali
Javadpour, is greatly appreciated.
Conflict
of Interest: None declared
References
1.
Sahney S, Banwet DK, Karunes S. Conceptualizing
total quality management in higher education. The TQM Magazine 2004; 16(2):145-59.
2.
Sangeeta S, Banwet DK, Karunes S.
An integrated framework for quality in education: application of quality function
deployment, interpretive structural modeling and path analysis. Total Quality Management and Business
Excellence
2006; 17(2):265-85.
3.
Tabibi SJ, Ebadiazar F, Torani S,
Khalesi N. Total Quality Management in Healthcare. 1st ed. Tehran: ,Jahan
Rayaneh; 2001.
4.
Noor
Hazilah AM, Dinon M, Kalthom A .Development
and validation of patient satisfaction instrument. Leadersh Health Serv 2012;
25(1):27-38.
5.
Alhashem
AM, Alquraini H, Chowdhury RI. Factors influencing patient satisfaction in
primary healthcare clinics in Kuwait. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2011; 24(3):249-62.
6.
Soleimanpour
H, Gholipouri C, Salarilak S, Raoufi P, Vahidi RG, Jafari Rouhi A, et al. Emergency
department patient satisfaction survey in Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Int
J Emerg Med 2011; 4:2. doi:10.1186/1865-1380-1-2
7.
Shahidi M. The Relationship between
the analytical quality requirements and organizational commitment of nurses in
Kerman. [MSc Thesis]. Kerman:
Islamic Azad University; 2013.
8.
Edvard S. Total Quality Management in Education. [SA.
Hadighi, Translate]. Tehran: Havaye Taze; 2002.
9.
Riyahi B. The new theory of total
quality management in public sector of Iran (Design state the circuit quality).
1st ed. Tehran: Industrial Research & Training Center of Iran; 2006.
10.
Naebzadeh
Sh, Fatahi Zarch MM. Evaluating the Service Quality of Police + 10 Offices
Using SERVQUAL. Journal of Marketing Management 2009; 4(7):115-36.
11.
Douglas A, Douglas
J. Campus spies? Using mystery students to evaluate university
performance. Education Research 2006; 48(1):111-9.
12.
Azar A, Alimohammadlu M, Moghbelbaarz A, Ahmadi
P. Design a framework for measuring the quality of services in the
supply chain. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective 2012; 2(6):9-24.
13.
Sarlak MA, Akhondi
AR, Vazirzanjani HR. Identifying
dimensions of service quality in the auto leasing industry (Case Study). Daneshvar
Raftar (Management and Achievement) 2011; 18(47):81-96.
14.
Latifian
A. Study of the effectiveness and
relationship of service quality dimensions in the Central Library of Ferdowsi
University of Mashhad (SERVQUAL scale methods based on structural equation).
Knowledge
& technology 2012; 2(4(:30-58.
15.
Mohammadnia
M, Delgoshaei B, Tofighi S, Rihai L, Omrani A. Survey on nursing services quality
by Servqual at Tehran Social Security Organization Hospitals. Journal of
Hospital 2010; 8(3 and 4):68-73.
16.
Nouri
HS. Applying SERVQUAL model in Rasoule Akram hospital. [MSc thesis]. Tehran:
Iran University of Medical Science; 2006.
17.
Mohammadi
A, Eftekhar Ardabili H, Akbari Haghighi F, Mahmoudi M, Poorreza A. Evaluation
of services quality based on the patients expectations and percetions in zanjan
hospitals. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health
Research 2004; 2(2):71-84.
18.
West
E. Management matters: the link between hospital organization and quality of
patient care. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(1):40-8.
19.
Cronin
JJ, Taylor SA. Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J Mark
1992; 56(3):55-68.
20.
Lu
KY, Lin PL, Wu CM, Hsieh YL, Chang YY. The relationships among turnover
intentions, professional commitment and job satisfaction of hospital nurses. J
Prof Nurs 2002; 18(4):214-9.
21.
Larijani
B. physician and ethical considerations. 1st ed. Tehran: for Tomorrow; 2013. (A
review of the principles of medical ethics; vol 1).
22.
Mohammad
Moradi, Marziyeh Khatooni, Reza Zeighami, Hasan Jahani hashemi, Mohammadreza
Sheikhi Relationship
between Professional Commitment and Job Satisfaction in Qazvin’s Pubic
Educational Hospital Nurses. Medical Ethics
Journal 2013; 7(24):55-78.
23.
Apker
J, Propp KM, Zabava Ford WS, Hofmeister N. Collaboration, credibility,
compassion, and coordination: professional nurse communication skill sets in
health care team interactions. J Prof Nurs 2006; 22(3):180-9.
24.
Sabour,
M. Review the professional commitment of teachers [MSc Thesis]. Marand: Payame
Noor University of Marand University of Marand; 2008.
25.
Salajegheh
S, Sistani Khanaman F. The survey of relationship between work ethic and
quality of service in government agencies Kerman. Paper presented at: The National
Conference the Challenges of Management and Leadership in Iranian Organizations;
2010 July 15; Esfahan, Iran.
26.
Larijani B, Zahedi
F. Medicine and modern medical ethics. Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism
2005; 4:1-11.
27.
Singer
PA. Recent advances: medical ethics. BMJ 2000; 321(7256):282-5.
28.
Chidwick
P, Faith K, Godkin D, Hardingham L. Clinical education of ethicists: the role
of a clinical ethics fellowship. BMC Med Ethics 2004; 5:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-5-6.
29.
Gholami
A. Ethical organization: problems, obstacles and the solutions. Police Human
Development 2009; 6(25):63-83.
30.
Bruhn
JG. The changing limits of professionalism in allied health. J Allied Health
1987; 16(2):111-8.
31.
Swick
HM. Viewpoint: professionalism and humanism beyond the academic health center.
Acad Med 2007; 82(11):1022-8.
32.
Soleimani N, Abbaszadeh
N, Niaz Azari B. The Relationship
Work Ethics to Staffs’ Job Satisfaction and Job Stress in Vocational and
Technical Education Organization in Tehran. Journal Management System 2012; 3(9):21-38.
33.
Marbaghi
A, Harvabadi SH. Management of Nursing and Midwifery. Tehran: Iran University
of Medical Sciences; 2007.
34.
Morrison
EW. Organizational citizenship behavior as critical link between HRM practice
and service quality. Hum Resour Manage 1996; 35(4):493-512.
*
Corresponding author: Sanjar
Salajegheh, Dept Public Management, Kerman Branch, Islamic
Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
Email: sanjarsalajegheh@gmail.com