Volume 7, Issue 1 (Winter 2018)
J Occup Health Epidemiol 2018, 7(1): 37-43 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Department of Ergonomics, School of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , m.saremi@sbmu.ac.ir
2- School of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- School of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Article history
Received: 2017/12/13
Accepted: 2018/02/4
ePublished: 2018/04/16
Accepted: 2018/02/4
ePublished: 2018/04/16
Subject:
Occupational Health
Abstract: (7226 Views)
Background: Assessment of aerobic capacity is of vital importance in both general community and occupational settings. Valid, reliable and feasible tests are required to indicate the functionality of cardiopulmonary system. The present study was carried out aiming to evaluate the suitability of the Chester step test (CST) as a field test to measure the Iranians’ aerobic capacity.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study performed in 2016, 63 university students completed the Astrand-rhyming cycle ergometer test and the CST. Actual and predicted maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max) were recorded and their relationship was examined by Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot. Repeatability was checked using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: Predicted and actual amounts of VO2 max were significantly correlated (r = 0.868, P < 0.001). The mean difference between them was -0.89 ml/kg/minute. ICC between CST and the retest CST (CSTretest) was 0.858.
Conclusions: CST is a valid and reliable field test for the estimation of cardiorespiratory capacity among the study subjects. With its exclusive features (e.g. safety, convenience and ease of use), CST could be suggested as an alternative to other existing methods of estimating VO2 max; the applicability of the existing methods among Iranian individuals are unclear. However, like other estimation methods, special prudence should be adopted when dealing with critical health decisions.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study performed in 2016, 63 university students completed the Astrand-rhyming cycle ergometer test and the CST. Actual and predicted maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max) were recorded and their relationship was examined by Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot. Repeatability was checked using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: Predicted and actual amounts of VO2 max were significantly correlated (r = 0.868, P < 0.001). The mean difference between them was -0.89 ml/kg/minute. ICC between CST and the retest CST (CSTretest) was 0.858.
Conclusions: CST is a valid and reliable field test for the estimation of cardiorespiratory capacity among the study subjects. With its exclusive features (e.g. safety, convenience and ease of use), CST could be suggested as an alternative to other existing methods of estimating VO2 max; the applicability of the existing methods among Iranian individuals are unclear. However, like other estimation methods, special prudence should be adopted when dealing with critical health decisions.
References
1. Marras WS, Cutlip RG, Burt SE, Waters TR. National occupational research agenda (NORA) future directions in occupational musculoskeletal disorder health research. Appl Ergon 2009; 40(1):15-22. [DOI] [PMID]
2. Grandjean E, Kroemer KHE. Fitting the task to the human: a textbook of occupational ergonomics. 5th ed. Boca Raton, Florida, United States: CRC Press; 1997. [Book]
3. Leka S, Jain A. Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. 1st ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. [Book]
4. Åstrand PO. Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise. 1st ed. Champaign, United States: Human Kinetics; 2003. [Book]
5. Powers S, Howley E. Exercise physiology: Theory and application to fitness and performance. 9th ed. New York, United States: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. [Book]
6. Grant S, Corbett K, Amjad AM, Wilson J, Aitchison T. A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med 1995; 29(3):147-52. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Sykes K, Roberts A. The chester step test—a simple yet effective tool for the prediction of aerobic capacity. Physiotherapy 2004; 90(4):183-8. [Article] [DOI]
8. Åstrand PO, Ryhming I. A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fitness) from pulse rate during sub-maximal work. J Appl Physiol 1954; 7(2):218-21. [DOI] [PMID]
9. Bayly WM, Gabel AA, Barr SA. Cardiovascular effects of submaximal aerobic training on a treadmill in Standardbred horses, using a standardized exercise test. Am J Vet Res 1983; 44(4):544-53. [PMID]
10. Bennett H, Parfitt G, Davison K, Eston R. Validity of Submaximal Step Tests to estimate maximal oxygen uptake in healthy adults. Sports Med 2016; 46(5):737-50. [DOI] [PMID]
11. Ekblom Ö. Testing the validity of three submaximal ergometer tests for estimating maximal aerobic capacity in children. Acta Paediatr 2014; 103(5):559-63. [DOI] [PMID]
12. Buckley JP, Sim J, Eston RG, Hession R, Fox R. Reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test to predict aerobic power and to prescribe aerobic exercise. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38(2):197-205. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Molloy MS, Robertson CM, Ciottone GR. Chester Step Test as a reliable, reproducible method of assessing physical fitness of disaster deployment personnel. South Med J 2017; 110(8):494-6. [DOI] [PMID]
14. Maggio ABR, Vuistiner P, Crettenand A, Tabin R, Martin XE, Beghetti M, et al. Adapting the "Chester step test" to predict peak oxygen uptake in children. Swiss Med Wkly 2017; 147:w14435. [DOI] [PubMed]
15. Punakallio A, Lindholm H, Luukkonen R, Lusa S. Lifestyle factors predicting changes in aerobic capacity of aging firefighters at 3-and 13-year follow-ups. J Occup Environ Med 2012; 54(9):1133-41. [DOI] [PubMed]
16. Firoozeh M, Saremi M, Kavousi A, Maleki A. Demographic and occupational determinants of the work ability of firemen. J Occup Health 2017; 59(1):81-7. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Chatterjee S, Chatterjee P, Mukherjee P, Bandyopadhyay A. Validity of Queen's College step test for use with young Indian men. British journal of sports medicine. 2004;38(3):289-91. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Cheevers A, Pettersen C. Åstrand Bike Test, 6 minute submaximal exercise test. 26th ed. Amesterdam, Netherlands: Hogeschool van Amsterdam; 2007. [Book]
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8(2):135-60. [DOI] [PMID]
20. Sheahan PJ, Nelson-Wong EJ, Fischer SL. A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test–retest reliability and internal consistency. Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37(25):2367-74. [DOI] [PMID]
21. Webb C, Vehrs PR, George JD, Hager R. Estimating VO2max using a personalized step test. Meas Phys Edu Exerc Sci 2014; 18(3):184-97. [Article] [DOI]
22. Karloh M, Correa KS, Martins LQ, Araujo CL, Matte DL, Mayer AF. Chester step test: assessment of functional capacity and magnitude of cardiorespiratory response in patients with COPD and healthy subjects. Braz J Phys Ther 2013; 17(3):227-35. [DOI] [PMID]
23. de Camargo AA, Justino T, de Andrade CH, Malaguti C, Dal Corso S. Chester step test in patients with COPD: reliability and correlation with pulmonary function test results. Respir Care 2011; 56(7):995-1001. [DOI] [PMID]
24. Abdossaleh Z, AHmadi F. Assessment of the Validity of Queens Step Test for estimation maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max). International Journal of Sport Studies 2013; 3(6):617-22. [Article]
25. Heydari P, Varmazyar S, Nikpey A, Safari Variani A, Jafarvand M. Step Test: a method for evaluating maximum oxygen consumption to determine the ability kind of work among students of medical emergencies. Electron Physician 2017; 9(3):4020-6. [DOI:10.19082/4020] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Firoozeh M, Saremi M, Maleki A, Kavousi A. Investigation of maximal aerobic capacity and associated factors in firefighters. Iran Occupational Health 2015; 12(3):15-26. [Article]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |