Volume 10, Issue 2 (Spring 2021)                   J Occup Health Epidemiol 2021, 10(2): 105-112 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- BSc in Occupational Health, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
2- 2. Faculty Instructor, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran; Ph.D Student in Occupational Health, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Trabiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Assistant Prof., Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. , v.zaroushani@qums.ac.ir
4- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Article history
Received: 2021/06/12
Accepted: 2021/09/12
ePublished: 2021/10/30
Abstract:   (1280 Views)

Background: Risk assessment is an important tool for reducing casualties and financial damage in the oil and gas industry. This research aimed to identify and evaluate process hazards in the petrochemical industry in 2016.
Material and Methods: In this case study, a team was organized and briefed on the process. Besides, hazard identification was performed using the Hazard and Operability Study. Next, causes were analyzed using the Fault Tree Analysis and occurrence probability of top events. Finally, events and subevents were ranked. The minimum cut sets were determined using Boolean algebra.
Results: A total of 77 events were identified. Accordingly, unacceptable, tolerable, and acceptable risk levels were 41, 31, and 5 events, respectively. Fire was the most unacceptable risk level, with the final events of "human errors in correct gasket installation on the flange surface" and "flange defects" having had the shares of 51.2 and 21.55%, respectively.
Conclusion: The combination of the two HAZOP and FTA techniques is useful in process industries in which incomplete performance of the system and control systems is the most effective factor in the potential occurrence of fire. Human errors and flange defects are the two main factors in this event, so occupational safety and health must be improved in this system. Thus, due to complex interactions between humans, machines, materials, and the environment in systems, such as the petrochemical industry, which lead to uncertainties in safety results of the process, risk assessment is recommended to be performed periodically using different techniques.

Full-Text [PDF 496 kb]   (656 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (289 Views)  

References
1. Badida P, Balasubramaniam Y, Jayaprakash J. Risk evaluation of oil and natural gas pipelines due to natural hazards using fuzzy fault tree analysis. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2019; 66:284-92. [DOI]
2. Yuan C, Cui H, Tao B, Ma S. Cause factors in emergency process of fire accident for oil and gas storage and transportation based on fault tree analysis and modified Bayesian network model. Energy Environ 2018; 29(5):802-21. [DOI]
3. Noriyati RD, Prakoso AB, Musyafa A, Soeprijanto A. HAZOP Study and Determination of Safety Integrity Level Using Fault Tree Analysis on Fuel Gas Superheat Burner of Ammonia Unit in Petrochemical Plant, East Java. Asian J Appl Sci 2017; 5(2):396-409. [DOI]
4. Tang Y, Jing J, Zhang Z, Yang Y. A Quantitative Risk Analysis Method for the High Hazard Mechanical System in Petroleum and Petrochemical Industry. Energies 2018; 11(1):14. [DOI]
5. Yazdi M, Adesina KA, Korhan O, Nikfar F. Learning from Fire Accident at Bouali Sina Petrochemical Complex Plant. J Fail Anal Prev 2019; 19(6):1517-36. [DOI]
6. Kabir S. An overview of fault tree analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis. Expert Syst Appl 2017; 77:114-35. [DOI]
7. Bouasla SEI, Zennir Y, Mechhoud EA. Risk Analysis Using HAZOP-Fault Tree-Event Tree Methodology Case Study: Naphta Stabilizer-A Reflux Drum (LPG separation) in RA1K. Alger J Signals Syst 2020; 5(2):98-105. [DOI]
8. Fuentes-Bargues JL, González-Cruz MC, González-Gaya C, Baixauli-Pérez MP. Risk Analysis of a Fuel Storage Terminal Using HAZOP and FTA. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(7):705. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Muram FU, Javed MA, Punnekkat S. System of Systems Hazard Analysis Using HAZOP and FTA for Advanced Quarry Production. Paper presented at: The 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS); 2019 Nov 20-22; Rome. Italy. [DOI]
10. Kang J, Sun L, Soares CG. Fault Tree Analysis of floating offshore wind turbines. Renew Energy 2019; 133:1455-67. [DOI]
11. Yang Y, Jung I. Boolean Algebra Application in Simplifying Fault Tree Analysis. Int J Saf 2017; 1(1):12-9. [DOI]
12. Yazdi M, Nikfar F, Nasrabadi M. Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 2017; 8(2):1177-93. [DOI]
13. International Standard. Petroleum and natural gas industries — Offshore production installations — Major accident hazard management during the design of new installations. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standard; 2016. Available from: https://hse.mop.ir/portal/file/?286314/iso-17776-2016.pdf. [Report]
14. Mohammadfam I, Kianfar A. Application of Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) in Evaluation of Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) Hazards (Case Study: Oil Storage of National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company). J Environ Sci Technol 2010; 12(1):39-49. [Article]
15. Yuan C, Cui H, Ma S, Zhang Y, Hu Y, Zuo T. Analysis method for causal factors in emergency processes of fire accidents for oil-gas storage and transportation based on ISM and MBN. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2019; 62:103964. [DOI]
16. Kavandi N, Dehghan H, Sharif-Rouhani M. Investigation of Operational Hazards in Gas Depressurization Stations Using Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Method. J Health Sys Res 2018; 14(3):384-9. [DOI]
17. Karami M, Samimi A, Jafari M. The necessity of risk management evaluations in petrochemical industries. Advanced Journal of Chemistry-Section B 2020; 2(3):151-8. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.