Occupational Exposure to pesticides and spontaneous
abortion among female pistachio farmers: a case-control study
Vazirinejad R, PhD 1, Jamalizadeh A, MD 2,
Tajik S, MS 3, Shamsizadeh A, PhD 4*
1-
Associate Prof., Social Determinants of Health Research Centre, Medical School,
Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences,
Rafsanjan, Iran. 2- Physician, Medical School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. 3- Medical
Students, Medical School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan,
Iran. 4- Assistant Prof., Physiology-Pharmacology Research Centre, Rafsanjan
University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Abstract
Received: May 2012, Accepted:
September 2012
Background: The majoritiy of abortion
risk factors has been classified as environmental and vary from one place to
another. This study aimed to explore the relationship between exposure to
pesticides and spontaneous abortion among female pistachio farmers in
Rafsanjan, Iran. Materials
and Methods:
In this case-control study, 50 women with spontaneous abortion and 50 women
without this history who were matched based on some factors were recruited.
Cases and controls were recruited through the list of all pregnant women who
were registered in the rural health centers of the county. A written consent form was taken. Dependent
and independent variables were experiencing spontaneous abortion and had been
exposed to pistachio farms pesticides, respectively. Data were analyzed using
descriptive statistics. Odds ratio was also calculated to measure the level
of risk for spontaneous abortion after exposing to pistachio pesticides and
95% confidence interval was reported.
Results: About 72% and 22% of mothers
with and without spontaneous abortion had experienced working in pistachio
farms during their pregnancy, respectively. There was a significant level of
risk for mothers who had worked in pistachio farms (during their pregnancy)
to experience spontaneous abortion compared to those mothers who did not (Odds
Ratio= 9.1, 95%CI=3.7-22.6). Odds ratio showed an increasing risk of
spontaneous abortion among those who helped with spraying pesticides in
pistachio farms compared to those mothers who did not (OR= 9.3,
95%CI=2.0-43.7). Conclusion: Exposure to pesticides has
been a major risk for causing spontaneous abortion among pregnant pistachio
farmers in the area of this research. Further investigations are recommended. |
Key words: Spontaneous Abortion,
Pregnancy, Pesticides, Pistachio
Introduction
Pesticides are mainly utilized in
agriculture for crop protection. Pesticides are also applied in homes and
gardens. More than 140,000 tones of pesticides are used annually in the
European Union for agricultural purposes only [1]. A pesticide is “any substance or
mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying or controlling any
pest” [2]. Pesticides may differ according to
their chemical structure. Pesticides are suspected for causing short-term
adverse health effects as well as for a *wide range of
chronic effects. Acute health effects
include stinging eyes, rashes, blisters, blindness, nausea, dizziness, diarrhea
and death [3, 4]. Chronic effects, which can occur
months or years after the exposure, include cancers, neurological and
developmental toxicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, respiratory effects and
disruption of the endocrine system. Pesticides may affect not only the exposed
individual but also subsequent generations [5-8]. There has
been a rising concern about the adverse effects of pesticides on human
reproduction, ranging from subfertility to abortion and malformations [9-11].
Abortion
could be committed due to some medical reasons. However, some other sorts of
abortion might happen as a result of unpredicted factors. These factors result
in spontaneous abortion. Many risk factors have been known to cause spontaneous
abortion among pregnant women. The big majorities of these factors are classified
as environmental factors and vary from one place to another. Sometimes some
sorts of man-made products can cause abortion, however, these products might be
medications such as thalidomide [12].
The effect of exposure to X-Ray or other types of radiations on abortion
among pregnant women has also been well documented.
Occupational
and environmental exposures to farming [13-16] and
pesticides [15, 17, 18, 19], have been
associated with pathological disorders such as tumors. Some pesticides contain alkylureas or amines
that metabolize to nitroso compounds, which have been associated with
neurogenic tumors [19, 20]. A broad range of these products have
been identified so far and most of them would harm when are, in particular,
used in an abnormal range. Huge amounts of pesticides are being used in
pistachio farms by both male and female farmers annually.
This
study aimed to explore the relationship between exposure to pesticides and spontaneous
abortion among female pistachio farmers in Rafsanjan, Iran.
Material
and Methods
In
this case-control study, 50 women with spontaneous abortion and 50 women without
this history (giving natural birth) who were matched to the case group based on
some factors such as age, the number of pregnancy, social class, place of
living, educational status, and the exposure to trauma and X-ray during
pregnancy were recruited. Respondents in both case and control groups were
invited to three rural health centres located in Southeast area of Rafsanjan,
Iran. For selecting cases, all eligible female farmers, who were registered as
experiencing spontaneous abortion in the last 12 months, in the three health
centres were listed, based on the date of their abortion. There were 71 women
in the list, and almost 45 days had passed since latest spontaneous abortion. In
other words, women in the case group had had a spontaneous abortion in the last
12 months and their pregnancy was terminated by unwanted abortions. The first
50 women experiencing spontaneous abortion, who were eligible according to
inclusion criteria of the study were invited. They received details about the
method and the objectives of the study. A written consent form was taken from
respondents who were willing to help with the study. The method of the study
was approved by the ethics committee of the university. Women in the control
group were invited from the list of all women who had a natural duration of
pregnancy and gave births normality, without experiencing abortion in the same
period of time as women in the case group (in the last twelve months).
Inclusion
criteria of the study included; ages between 18 and 40 years, receiving no
medication during pregnancy, and no history of disease, trauma, smoking and/or exposure
to X-ray during pregnancy. Further to these criteria, cases who had experienced
spontaneous abortion during the last 12 months were included.
Dependent
and independent variables in our analytical study were experiencing spontaneous
abortion and exposure to pistachio farms' pesticides, respectively. Data were collected
by trained experts using a study checklist in interview sessions. The study
checklist included items about the factors listed above including inclusion
criteria items and some more demographic factors such as the number of
pregnancy, social class, the place of living (city/village), educational status
and the history of abortion and its date (months, day, time). Respondents were
interviewed in the health centers. For the purpose of measuring social class,
annual income of the respondent’s family were recorded and divided into 12
months. Monthly family income less than 4000,000 Rls, between 4000,000 and
10,000,000 Rls and more than 10,000,000 Rls were considered as low, moderate
and high social class, respectively.
In
order to assess the history of exposure to pesticides, there were few items on
the checklist including; “were you living in or near a pistachio farm during
pregnancy?”, “did you work in the pistachio farms to spray pesticide during
pregnancy?”, “how often did you work in the pistachio farms to spray pesticides
during pregnancy (per week)?”, “how much time, on average (minutes) did you
spend in the pistachio farms to spray pesticide per each session, during
pregnancy?”.
Positive
answer to the first two questions showed exposure to the pesticides. Data were analyzed
in SPSS and results were reported using descriptive statistics methods such as
tables, charts and numerical indices. Parametric tests (such as t-test) and
non-parametric tests (such as Chi-square) were used to compare groups where
appropriate. Odds ratio (OR) was also calculated to measure the level of risk
for spontaneous abortion after exposing to pistachio pesticides and 95%
confidence interval was reported.
Results
Mean
age of respondents in the two groups of case (a group of mothers with the
history of spontaneous abortion) and control (a group of mothers without the
history of spontaneous abortion) were 30.8 ± 5.8 and 28.9 ± 5.2 years,
respectively. There was no significant difference of age between the two
groups. Distribution of respondents in the two groups of case and control based
on some demographic variables is presented in table 1.
As
it is presented in the table, there was
not any significant differences between the two groups of case and control
based on the number of pregnancy, social class, the place of living, family
job, educational status, and the exposure to trauma and X-ray during
pregnancy. There was no smoker among our
respondents. As it is illustrated in
table 2, 98% of mothers with spontaneous abortion were living inside the
pistachio farms, whereas 88% of mothers in the other group were living inside
pistachio farms during their pregnancy. Eight percent of mothers in the case
group had a history of experiencing spontaneous abortion in their family. There
was not spontaneous abortion reported among the family of mothers in control group.
Table 1:
Distribution of respondents in the two groups of case and control based on some
demographic variables
Demographic
variables |
Spontaneous
abortion (groups) |
Total |
||||
Yes
(case) |
No
(control) |
|||||
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
% |
|
The
No. of pregnancies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
1 |
33 |
66 |
29 |
58 |
62 |
62 |
-
1-2 |
11 |
22 |
15 |
30 |
26 |
26 |
- >2 |
6 |
12 |
6 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Educational status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- illiteracy |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
- primary/secondary |
13 |
26 |
14 |
28 |
27 |
27 |
- high school/diploma |
29 |
58 |
24 |
48 |
53 |
53 |
- higher |
7 |
14 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
19 |
Family job |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- labor |
36 |
72 |
34 |
68 |
70 |
70 |
- farmer |
12 |
24 |
16 |
32 |
28 |
28 |
- other |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
Living place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- city |
47 |
94 |
49 |
98 |
96 |
96 |
- village |
3 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Trauma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Yes |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
-
No |
49 |
98 |
50 |
100 |
99 |
99 |
X-Ray |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Yes |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
-
No |
50 |
100 |
49 |
98 |
99 |
99 |
Social class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Low |
17 |
34 |
16 |
32 |
33 |
33 |
-
Moderate |
27 |
54 |
28 |
56 |
55 |
55 |
-
High |
6 |
12 |
6 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
In
order to measure the exposure of respondents to pesticides used in pistachio
farms, items were asked about their cooperation in farming activities as well
as their cooperation in spraying pesticides during their pregnancy. Living
place of mothers during their pregnancy was also recorded. The distance between
the place of respondents residence during the pregnancy and pistachio farms was
also recorded for women in the two groups of case and control. The average of
this distance for the two groups of case and control were 1.7±0.5 and 2.5±1.5
km, respectively. The results of
independent t-test showed that the distance between the living place of mothers
with spontaneous abortion and pistachio farms was significantly shorter than
this distance for mothers without the history of abortion (t=3.3, df= 98, p<
0.001). The level of risk for experiencing spontaneous abortion among mothers
who were living inside pistachio farms was 6.7 times higher (OR= 6.7, 95%CI= 1
– 57.7) than this risk among those mothers who were living outside pistachio
farms during their pregnancy (table2).
The
results showed that 72% of mothers with spontaneous abortion experienced
working in pistachio farms during their pregnancy. This proportion for mothers
in the control group (without spontaneous abortion) was 22% (table 2). There
was a significant level of risk for mothers who worked in pistachio farms
(during their pregnancy) to experience spontaneous abortion compared to mothers
who did not (OR= 9.1, 95% CI = 3.7-22.6) (table3).
Table 2: Distribution of mothers in the two
groups of case and control based on some effective variables
Effective
variables |
groups |
Total |
||||
case |
control |
|
||||
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
% |
|
Living place
During pregnancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Outside pistachio farms |
1 |
2 |
6 |
12 |
7 |
7 |
- Inside pistachio farms |
49 |
98 |
44 |
88 |
93 |
93 |
History of
abortion in family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- No |
46 |
92 |
50 |
100 |
96 |
96 |
- Yes |
4 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
Farming
(working in pistachio farms) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- No |
14 |
28 |
39 |
78 |
53 |
53 |
- Yes |
36 |
72 |
11 |
22 |
47 |
47 |
Spraying pesticides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- No |
2 |
4 |
14 |
28 |
16 |
16 |
- Yes |
48 |
96 |
36 |
72 |
84 |
84 |
Ninety
six and 72% of mothers in the two groups of case and control, respectively,
reported their cooperation in spraying activities in pistachio farms (table2).
Odds ratio calculation showed an increasing risk of spontaneous abortion among
those who helped with spraying pesticides in pistachio farms compared to those
mothers who did not (OR= 9.3, 95% CI = 2.0-43.7) (table 3).
Table 3: The
level of risk for experiencing spontaneous abortion among mothers who were
facing with some conditions in which their exposure to pesticides increased
Categories |
|
The level of risk |
95% Confidence Interval |
|||
Lower bond |
Upper bond |
|||||
Living place
During pregnancy |
|
|
|
|||
- Outside pistachio farms |
1.0 |
- |
- |
|||
- Inside pistachio farms |
6.7 |
1.1 |
57.7 |
|||
History of
abortion in family |
|
|
|
|||
- No |
1.0 |
- |
- |
|||
- Yes |
2.1 |
1.7 |
2.6 |
|||
Farming
(working in pistachio farms) |
|
|
|
|||
- No |
1.0 |
- |
- |
|||
- Yes |
9.1 |
3.7 |
22.6 |
|||
Spraying pesticides
|
|
|
|
|||
- No |
1.0 |
- |
- |
|||
- Yes |
9.3 |
2.0 |
43.7 |
|||
Discussion
Our
results showed that the two groups of mothers with and without spontaneous
abortion were properly matched. There were not any significant differences
between the two groups of case and control based on the number of pregnancy,
social class, the place of living, family job, educational status, the exposure
to trauma and X-ray during pregnancy and smoking. This shows that the effect of
these factors on the independent factor (spontaneous abortion) was adequately
controlled. This increases the strength of the causal relation between the
independent variable (exposure to pesticides) and dependent variable
(spontaneous abortion) obtained in our study.
There
were few variables measured in our study representing the history of exposure
to pistachio farm pesticides. These include living place of respondents during
pregnancy (inside or outside the pistachio farms), the distance between living
place of respondents during pregnancy and pistachio farms (close or far from
pistachio farms), working in pistachio farms during pregnancy as well as
respondent's cooperation in spraying pesticides in pistachio farms.
Our findings showed that
significantly higher proportions of mothers with spontaneous abortion were
living inside pistachio farms during their pregnancy compared to mothers who
had not abortion. Further, mothers with spontaneous abortion were,
significantly, closer to the pistachio farms during their pregnancy in
comparison with mothers with no abortion. Also, a very big majority of mothers
with spontaneous abortion (case group) had the experience of working in
pistachio farms as well as helping with spraying pesticides in pistachio farms
during their pregnancy (72% and 96%, respectively). Whereas, these proportions
were significantly lower among mothers in the control group (22% and 72%,
respectively). The risk level of experiencing spontaneous abortion among
mothers who were facing with these variables was significantly higher than this
risk among mothers who did not face these variables. The common point between
these variables is that respondents could have direct contact to pesticides
based on these variables. No protective equipment is usually used over the
duration of working in pistachio farms by pistachio farmers. We concluded that
mothers who had direct contact to pesticides (due to living inside or close to
pistachio farms and/or working in pistachio farms and/or cooperation in
spraying pesticides in pistachio farms during the pregnancy), had significantly
higher level of risk for experiencing spontaneous abortion compared to mothers
who did not have this contact.
Exposure to poisons such as
pesticides can be intentional or unintentional and the effects vary with the
amount of exposure. Similar to the community of our study, there are many
reports of poisoning by pesticides worldwide [21]. Unintentional exposure to
pesticides among respondents in our study is due to their occupational affairs.
Pesticides exposure generates both acute and chronic disadvantages of which
spontaneous abortion is very important. The effect of exposure to pesticides on
human health is widely measured [22]. Beseler et al concluded that both
acute high-intensity and cumulative pesticide exposure may contribute to
depression in pesticide applicators [23]. The disadvantages of exposure to
pesticides have been known for several decades. For example, the Minamata
episode in the 1950’s in Japan has made it clear that pregnant women who are
exposed to low concentrations of pesticides (e.g methimercury) may experience
few symptoms and yet can give birth to severely retarded children [24]. Exposure to high concentration of
these chemical substances is even more dangerous and is happening among
pistachio farmers in the area of this study at the moment.
It has been claimed that genetic
differences may have a great effect on toxicity [25]. In our study we measured the
history of spontaneous abortion among the family of the two groups of case and
control. Our results confirmed that this history in mothers with spontaneous
abortion was more frequently reported compared to the other group who did not
have spontaneous abortion. This result could confirm the effect of genetic
factors on abortion. However, this might be due to similar job and similar
exposure to pistachio pesticides due to their family occupation e.g. working in
pistachio farms.
Pesticides are classified based on
their chemical structures which include organochlorides such as DDT and
endosulfan, organophosphorus such as diazinon, carbamates such as fenoxycarb,
pyrethroids such as fenvalerate, anilides/anilines such as metolachlor, phenoxy
such as fenoprop triazines such as atrazine and propazine, quaternary such as
paraquat ureas such as metsulfuron. Most
of these chemical substances have been used in pistachio farms.
The method of exposing to pesticides
in our study is a direct contact to sprayed diluted pesticide into air which is
entered into respiratory system of respondents’ body. However, it has been
reported that dermal absorption is also suspected to be the main source of
occupational exposure [26]. Further to our investigation, some
studies found significant high risk of spontaneous abortion among women
directly exposed to pesticides [27-31]. However, a
typical case of poisoning by cutaneous absorption, will also, develop headache,
confusion, anorexia and a sense of unreality. It has been reported that over
700 active ingredients are in use worldwide as pesticides, each with specific
chemical and toxicological properties [26].
It should be declared again that in
addition to the desired effects of crop protection, pesticides have also shown
some adverse impacts on both human health and the environment. Humans are at
great risk of exposure through several pathways in occupational, agricultural
and household use. There are four possible routes for pesticide exposure
including inhalation, oral, dermal and ocular exposures. Ingestion of food and
water is thought to be the main routes of pesticide exposure in the general
population. Pesticides may cause reproductive toxicity with direct damage to
the structure of the cells or as a result of biotransformation into
metabolites, or interference with processes necessary for the natural
homeostasis and equilibrium.
Conclusion
It
is concluded from our findings that exposure to pesticides has been a great
risk for causing spontaneous abortion among pregnant female pistachio farmers
in the area of this research. Since there are many other disadvantages of
exposure to pesticides which are being used in very high amounts in pistachio
farms in Kerman province (in particular in Rafsanjan), Southeast, IR. Iran,
this problem must be listed as one of the highest health concerns of local
health headquarters. Further
investigations are also recommended.
Acknowledgment
We
thank all respondents who agreed to help with this work. We also appreciate the
valuable help we have received from general practitioners in recruiting
respondents and data collection process.
Conflict of
interest: Non declared
References
1.
Ramazzini C. Collegium ramazzini statement on the
control of pesticides in the European Union: A call for action to protect human
health. Am J Ind Med 2009; 52(2):176-7.
2.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. International code
of conduct on the distribution and use of pesticides. Rev. Ver. Rome, Italy:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2003.
3.
Jeyaratnam J. Acute pesticide poisoning: a major global
health problem. World Health Stat Q 1990; 43(3):139-44.
4.
Sanborn M, Kerr KJ, Sanin LH, Cole DC, Bassil KL, Vakil C.
Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review and implications for
family doctors. Can Fam Physician 2007; 53(10):1712-20.
5.
Alavanja MC, Hoppin JA, Kamel F. Health effects of chronic
pesticide exposure: cancer and neurotoxicity. Annu Rev Public Health 2004;
25:155-97.
6.
Ritter L, Goushleff NC, Arbuckle T, Cole D, Raizenne M. Addressing
the linkage between exposure to pesticides and human health effects-research
trends and priorities for research. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2006;
9(6):441-56.
7.
McCauley LA, Anger WK, Keifer M, Langley R, Robson MG,
Rohlman D. Studying health outcomes in farmworker populations exposed to
pesticides. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(6):953-60.
8.
Bassil KL, Vakil C, Sanborn M, Cole DC, Kaur JS, Kerr KJ.
Cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review. Can Fam Physician 2007;
53(10):1704-11.
9.
García AM. Pesticide exposure and women's health. Am J
Ind Med 2003; 44(6):584-94.
10. Weselak M, Arbuckle TE, Foster W. Pesticide
exposures and developmental outcomes: The epidemiological evidence. J Toxicol
Environ Health B Crit Rev 2007; 10(1-2):41-80.
11. Peiris-John RJ, Wickremasinghe R. Impact of
low-level exposure to organophosphates on human reproduction and survival.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2008; 102(3):239-45.
12. Kajii T, Kida M, Takahashi K. The effect of
thalidomide intake during 113 human pregnancies. Teratology 1973; 8(2):163-6.
13. De Roos AJ, Stewart PA, Linet MS, Heineman EF,
Dosemeci M, Wilcosky T & et.al. Occupation and the risk of adult glioma in
the United States. Cancer Causes Control 2003; 14(2):139-50.
14. Rajaraman P, De Roos AJ, Stewart PA, Linet MS,
Fine HA, Shapiro WR & et.al. Occupation and risk of meningioma and acoustic
neuroma in the United States. Am J Ind Med 2004; 45(5):395-407.
15. Carreón T, Butler MA, Ruder AM, Waters MA,
Davis-King KE, Calvert GM & et.al. Gliomas and farm pesticide exposure in
women: the Upper Midwest Health Study. Environ Health Perspect 2005;
113(5):546-51.
16. Khuder SA, Mutgi AB, Schaub EA. Meta-analyses of
brain cancer and farming. Am J Ind Med 1998; 34(3):252-60.
17. Frazier LM. Reproductive disorders associated with
pesticide exposure. J Agromedicine 2007; 12(1):27-37.
18. Inskip PD, Linet MS, Heineman EF. Etiology of
brain tumors in adults. Epidemiol Rev 1995; 17(2):382-414.
19. Muslcco M, Sant M, Molinari S, Filippini G, Gatta
G, Berrino F. A case-control study of brain gliomas and occupational exposure
to chemical carcinogens: the risk to farmers. Am J epidemiol 1988;
128(4):778-85.
20. Preussmann R, Eisenbrand G (1984). N-Nitroso
carcinogens in the environment. In: Searle CE, ed. Chemical carcinogens.
Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. P829-68.
21. Lee SJ, Mehler L, Beckman J, Diebolt-Brown B,
Prado J, Lackovic M & et.al. Acute pesticide
illnesses associated with off-target pesticide drift from agricultural
applications: 11 States, 1998–2006. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119(8):1162-9.
22. Calvert GM, Sanderson WT, Barnett M, Blondell JM, Mehler LN (2001).
Surveillance of pesticide-related illness and injury in humans. In: Krieger R, ed. Handbook of pesticide toxicology. 2nd
ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. P603--41.
23. Beseler CL, Stallones L, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MC,
Blair A, Keefe T & et.al. Depression and pesticide exposures among private
pesticide applicators enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health
Perspect 2008; 116(12):1713-9.
24. Turney WG. Mercury pollution: Michigan's action
program. J Water Pollut Control Fed 1971; 43(7):1427-38.
25. Tsatsakis AM, Zafiropoulos A, Tzatzarakis MN,
Tzanakakis GN, Kafatos A. Relation of PON1 and CYP1A1 genetic polymorphisms to
clinical findings in a cross-sectional study of a Greek rural population
professionally exposed to pesticides. Toxicol lett 2009; 186(1):66-72.
26. Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A,
Grandjean P, Guillette LJ Jr & et.al. Male reproductive health and
environmental xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104(Suppl
4):741-803.
27. Arbuckle TE, Savitz DA, Mery LS, Curtis KM.
Exposure to phenoxy herbicides and the risk of spontaneous abortion.
Epidemiology 1999; 10(6):752-60.
28. Arbuckle TE, Lin Z, Mery LS. An exploratory
analysis of the effect of pesticide exposure on the risk of spontaneous
abortion in an Ontario farm population. Environ Health Perspect 2001;
109(8):851-7.
29. Nurminen T. Maternal pesticide exposure and
pregnancy outcome. J Occup Environ Med 1995; 37(8):935-40.
30. Petrelli G, Figŕ-Talamanca I, Tropeano R, Tangucci
M, Cini C, Aquilani S & et.al. Reproductive male-mediated risk: spontaneous
abortion among wives of pesticide applicators. Eur J Epidemiol 2000;
16(4):391-3.
31. Crisostomo L, Molina VV. Pregnancy outcomes among
farming households of Nueva Ecija with conventional pesticide use versus
integrated pest management. Int J Occup Environ Health 2002; 8(3):232-42.
* Corresponding
Author: Ali Shamsizadeh, Physiology-Pharmacology research centre, Rafsanjan University of
Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
E-mail: ashamsi@rums.ac.ir or alishamsy@gmail.com rvazirinejad@yahoo.co.uk