Evaluation of the risk of musculoskeletal disorders using Rapid
Entire Body Assessment among hairdressers in Khorramabad, Iran, in
2014
Mahdavi
S, MSc1, Mahdavi MR, MSc2, safari M, MSc3, Rashidi
R, PhD4, Dehghani T, BSc5, Kosari M, BSc6
1.Faculty Member, Dept. of
Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Lorestan University of
Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran. 2. BSc student, Dept. of
Biomechanics,
school of physical education and sport sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic
Azad University
,Tehran, Iran. 3. Faculty Member, Dept. of Epidemiology, School of Health, Lorestan
University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran. 4. Assistant Prof., Dept. of
Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Lorestan University of
Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran. 5. MSc student, Dept. of Occupational
Health Engineering, School of Health, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences,
Khorramabad, Iran. 6. MSc student, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering,
School of Health, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Abstract
Received:
December 2014, Accepted:
April 2015
Background: Work-related musculoskeletal
disorders (WRMSDs) are considered a major factor in health problems, human
injuries, and loss of work time. The aim of the present study was to assess
the risk of musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) and evaluate the prevalence of MSD
among female hairdressers. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive analytical
study, the risk of MSDs was evaluated in 172 female hairdressers using the
Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method. Moreover, the prevalence of
WRMSDs was investigated using a Nordic questionnaire. All obtained data was
analyzed by means of SPSS software, and the logistic regression model. Results: The results
showed that 58.7%
of the hairdressers experienced pain in their lower back, 52.3% in their
neck, 41.3% in their knees, and 20.3% in their ankle. The
results of this study showed a significant correlation between BMI and MSDs
in the elbow, hip, and thigh. The results of REBA indicate that about 46% of
the 1032 postures were classified as high risk and about 14.9% as very high
risk. In addition, the results of this study showed a significant correlation
between REBA score and MSDs in the neck, wrist, hip, and thigh. Conclusions: With regard to the high prevalence of symptoms in the
waist, neck, and wrist, it can be concluded that prolonged standing,
uncomfortable working postures, strenuous movements, excessive shoulder
flexion and shoulder abduction, trunk flexion and forceful exertion, and
repetitive motion are considered important risk factors for MSDs. |
Keywords:
Risk, Body, Assessment, Musculoskeletal disorders.
Introduction
Work-related
musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) are one of the major occupational health
problems in many countries and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are common
among hairdressers (1, 2).
Hairdressers are exposed
to various hazards
in the workplace such as awkward posture, load on
the muscles, nerves, tendons, and joints, prolonged standing, and physical and
chemical agents (3). Leino
stated that hairdressers are exposed to chemical and ergonomic agents and work-relateddisorders,
although the risk of WRMSDs* was the greatest among them (4). According
to the results of a National Health Interview Survey In 2002 by Guo, of the top
15 major occupations, female hairdressers were the third most at risk for
work-related lower back pain (5). Pain and discomfort in the neck, wrist/hand,
and lower back region were commonly reported by Greek hairdressers. These were
related to prolonged sitting, upper arms elevation, inappropriate body
postures, and use of vibrating tools (6). According to another research, manual
material handling, prolonged standing, awkward working postures, strenuous
movements, excessive shoulder flexion and abduction, trunk flexion and forceful
exertion, and repetitive motion are considered common risk factors for MSDs
(7). In addition, working with upper arms above shoulder height is considered a
major risk factor for neck and shoulder pain (8, 9). Moreover, most studies
stated that the static activity of the muscles of the neck and shoulder and
static loadings restrict blood flow to the muscles and tendons, and mechanical
stress on the shoulder muscles or tendons could possibly be due to
pathophysiological mechanisms (10).
Work is an important and integral segment of
human life, but the development of technology has caused an increase in occupational
diseases and WRMSDs are the most common among them (11, 12). In this regard,
MSDs among hairdressers can be mentioned. A study assessing the risk factors of
WMSDs for hairdressers stated that 91.7% of hairdressers reported shoulder pain
as the most frequent problem followed by pain in the lower back (83.3%) and in
the neck region (75%) (13).
Furthermore,
other studies stated that inappropriate posture during work, repetitive
movements, improper and long standing, use of inappropriate tools, working with
the elbow above shoulder height, excessive shoulder flexion and shoulder
abduction, and pronation and supination are considered important risk factors
for WRMSDs among hairdressers (14, 15). These disorders can be prevented by the
use of ergonomics such as risk assessment methods, job analysis methods,
evaluation of work situations, and improvement of job situations (14, 15).
Therefore,
the aim of this study was to assess the risk of MSD by using Rapid Entire Body
Assessment (REBA) method and evaluate the prevalence of MSD among female
hairdressers by using a Nordic Questionnaire.
Materials
and Methods
This
descriptive analysis study was performed in 2014. First, the list of all the hairdressers
working in Khorramabad, Iran, was obtained through a trade association. The
number of female hairdressers in
Khorramabad was 300. From among them, 172 subjects were selected through census
sampling method according to the following equation:
In
this equation, p = 0.5, q = 0.5, z = 2, d = 0.05, and N = 300. All subjects
possessed professional certificates. The MSDs of these 172 female hairdressers
were evaluated. All tasks were observed by a trained occupational health and safety
practitioner. In first step, the owner of each hairdressing salon was contacted
to obtain permission to interview the hairdressers. In the second step, a
meeting was held with the hairdressers to invite them to take part in the study
and explain the objectives of the study. Data were collected using a Nordic
Questionnaire for Musculoskeletal Symptoms of Pain or Discomfort.
The
validity and reliability of the questionnaire have been determined in various
studies (16-18). After the end of data collection, the prevalence of WRMDs for
neck, shoulder, upper back, lower back, elbow/forearm, hand/wrist, and fingers
were calculated. Then, ergonomic analyses of the work of the hairdressers were
carried out. Next, the risk of MSDs was evaluated using the REBA method. The
REBA is a posture-based analysis technique used for the evaluation of the risk
of MSDs in various tasks, in particular for assessment of working postures in
health care and other services in the work place (19, 20).
Table 1: Rapid
Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scores and indications
Actions |
Action
level |
Risk level |
Score |
Not
necessary |
0 |
None
risk |
1 |
Can
be necessary |
1 |
Lower
risk |
2 to 3 |
It
is necessary |
2 |
Medium
risk |
4
to 7 |
It
is necessary to be done fast |
3 |
High
risk |
8 to 10 |
It
is urgent |
4 |
Very
high risk |
11 to 15 |
This
ergonomic method is a systematic tool which is used to evaluate whole body
postural WRMSDs and risks associated with occupational tasks. In this method, a
single page worksheet is used to evaluate required or selected body postures,
forceful exertions, type of movement, muscle activity (static/dynamic),
repetition, and coupling. The REBA worksheet is divided into 2 body segment
sections labeled A and B. Section A covers the neck, trunk, and leg. Section B
covers the arm and wrist. Postures of hairdressers body regions are observed
and postural scores increase with regarded to other items such as forceful
exertions, type of movement, muscle activity (static/dynamic), repetition, and
coupling. The scores are summed up to give one score for each posture (21). The
obtained scores are compared in table 1. All data
obtained was analyzed by means
of SPSS software (version 16, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and logistic
regression model.
Table
2: Demographics of hairdressers (n = 172)
Max |
Min |
SD
± Mean |
N |
Index |
68 |
18 |
7.99 ± 32.36 |
172 |
Age (year) |
112.00 |
41.00 |
1.08 ± 65.73 |
172 |
Weight (kg) |
1.78 |
1.39 |
0.63 ± 1.63 |
172 |
Height (m) |
Results
In the
present study, 172 female hairdressers participated. They were on average aged 32.36 years. Table 2 shows the mean and standard deviations of age,
weight, and height.
The prevalence of WRMDs for neck, shoulder, back, elbow/forearm, and
hand/wrist is presented in table 3.
Table 3: Prevalence of work-related
musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) for neck, shoulder, back, elbow/forearm, and
hand/ wrist in the hairdressers (n = 172)
Musculoskeletal disorders |
Region |
Limb |
|
(%) |
N |
||
52.3 |
90 |
- |
Neck |
18.6 |
32 |
right |
Shoulder |
10.5 |
18 |
left |
|
20.3 |
35 |
both |
|
7 |
12 |
right |
Elbow |
2.9 |
5 |
left |
|
4.1 |
7 |
both |
|
28.5 |
49 |
right |
Wrist and hand |
5.2 |
9 |
left |
|
15.1 |
26 |
both |
|
39.5 |
68 |
- |
Upper back |
58.7 |
101 |
- |
Lower back |
18 |
31 |
- |
Hip and thigh |
41.3 |
71 |
- |
Knee |
20.3 |
35 |
- |
Leg |
Table 4: Frequency
distribution of risk in the each of the postures
Very
High level risk (action level 4) |
High
level risk (action
level 3) |
Moderate
level risk (action level 2) |
Low
level risk (action
level 1) |
Task |
||||
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
|
1.7 |
3 |
47.4 |
82 |
45.7 |
79 |
4.6 |
8 |
Trimming eyebrows |
9.3 |
16 |
52.3 |
90 |
33.1 |
57 |
5.2 |
9 |
Trimming face |
4.4 |
8 |
48.3 |
83 |
43 |
74 |
4.1 |
7 |
Makeup |
19.2 |
33 |
44.8 |
77 |
25.6 |
44 |
10.5 |
18 |
Hair-cutting |
31.8 |
55 |
37 |
64 |
28.3 |
49 |
2.3 |
4 |
Hairdressing |
19.8 |
34 |
45.9 |
79 |
30.2 |
52 |
4.1 |
7 |
Hair-coloring
|
After
the end of the initial survey and interview with hairdressers, ergonomic
analyses of the work of the hairdressers in 6 important tasks were carried out
according to services offered (such as trimming, makeup, hair-cutting,
hair-coloring, and hair-perming). The risk of MSDs by using RULA is presented
in table 4 in the each of 6 tasks. In total, 1032 postures were evaluated. The
risks of MSDs, using RULA, are presented in table 5 in the 1032 postures.
According to table 5, most of the studied postures are classified as medium (34.4%)
and high risk postures (46%).
Table 5: Percentage of risk of Rapid
Entire Body Assessment (REBA) outputs (n = 1032 postures)
Percentage
of task |
Number
of task |
Action
Level |
Risk
level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No risk |
5.1 |
53 |
1 |
Low risk |
34.4 |
355 |
2 |
Medium risk |
46 |
475 |
3 |
High risk |
14.9 |
149 |
4 |
Very high risk |
The
results of logistic back ward logistic regression analyses on risk factors of
musculoskeletal disorder for the body regions such as wrists, forearms, elbows,
shoulders, neck, trunk, back, legs, and knees are presented in table 6. Table 7
shows the results of logistic back ward logistic regression analyses on the
musculoskeletal disorder for different regions of the body and REBA scores in
each task.
Table 6: Analysis of statistical
value between musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) and age, weight, height, and BMI
Musculoskeletal disorders in different
regions of the body |
Statistical value |
Measured index |
||||||||
Leg |
Knee |
Hip and thigh |
Lower back |
Upper back |
wrist
and hand |
Elbow |
Shoulder |
Neck |
||
0.882 172 |
0.02 172 |
0.036 172 |
0.117 172 |
0.388 172 |
0.095 172 |
0.358 172 |
0.025 172 |
0.01 172 |
P-value N |
Age
(year) |
0.694 172 |
0.129 172 |
0.030 172 |
0.202 172 |
0.148 172 |
0.203 172 |
0.058 172 |
0.757 172 |
0.431 172 |
P-value N |
Weight
(kg) |
0.644 172 |
0.145 172 |
0.034 172 |
0.138 172 |
0.130 172 |
0.196 172 |
0.087 172 |
0.763 172 |
0.698 172 |
P-value N |
Height
(m) |
0.695 172 |
0.109 172 |
0.039 172 |
0.232 172 |
0.149 172 |
0.213 172 |
0.053 172 |
0.826 172 |
0.368 172 |
P-value N |
BMI |
Table 7: Analysis of statistical value
between musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) in the regions of body and Rapid Entire
Body Assessment (REBA) Scores in each task
Musculoskeletal disorders in different
region of the body |
statistical value |
Measured index |
||||||||||||||||||||
Leg |
Knee |
Hip and thigh |
Lower back |
Upper back |
wrist
and hand |
Elbow |
Shoulder |
Neck |
||||||||||||||
1.378 0.001 172 |
1.107 0.433 172 |
1.086 0.651 172 |
1.114 0.379 172 |
1.081 0.542 172 |
1.329 0.025 172 |
1.234 0.265 172 |
1.028 0.820 172 |
1.238 0.021 172 |
OR P-value N |
REBA
score (Trimming eyebrows) |
||||||||||||
1.288 0.144 172 |
0.956 0.729 172 |
0.963 0.828 172 |
0.963 0.765 172 |
0.939 0.626 172 |
0.811 0.102 172 |
0.792 0.224 172 |
0.927 0.542 172 |
0.910 0.469 172 |
OR
P-value N |
REBA
score (Trimming face) |
||||||||||||
0.804 0.259 172 |
1.052 0.698 172 |
1.144 0.446 172 |
0.942 0.628 172 |
1.215 0.007 172 |
0.833 0.152 172 |
1.043 0.832 172 |
1.177 0.019 172 |
1.026 1.837 172 |
OR P-value N |
REBA
score (Make up) |
||||||||||||
1.073 0.703 172 |
1.084 0.586 172 |
0.806 0.261 172 |
1.099 0.085 172 |
1.217 0.176 172 |
1.208 0.051 172 |
1.443 0.098 172 |
1.090 0.539 172 |
1.299 0.041 172 |
OR P-value N |
REBA
score (Hair-cutting) |
||||||||||||
1.078 0.700 172 |
1.152 0.079 172 |
1.357 0.004 172 |
0.979 0.886 172 |
1.070 0.655 172 |
0.988 0.935 172 |
0.825 0.377 172 |
1.012 0.935 172 |
1.040 0.795 172 |
OR P-value N |
REBA
score (Hairdressing) |
||||||||||||
0.815 0.258 172 |
0.988 0.935 172 |
0.948 0.790 172 |
0.968 0.811 172 |
0.834 0.207 172 |
0.944 0.676 172 |
0.923 0.690 172 |
0.892 0.403 172 |
0.709 0.009 172 |
OR P-value N |
REBA
score (Hair-coloring) |
||||||||||||
Discussion
In the
present study, 58.7% of the hairdressers experienced pain in their lower back,
52.3% in their neck, 41.3% in their knees, 20.3% in their ankle, 28.5% in their
dominant right wrist and hand, 5.2% in their left wrist and hand, and 15.1% in
both their wrists and hands. About 20.3% of hairdressers experienced pain in
both their shoulders. The results of a similar survey conducted by Mussi
revealed that most of the discomfort is experienced in the shoulders (49%),
neck (47%), and back (39%) (22).
According to the research by
Chuang, 94.4% of hairdressers stated that they felt the greatest discomfort in their
shoulders, followed by the lower back and neck (23).
Kang
evaluated the prevalence of work-related symptoms among hairdressers (24). The
exposed group comprised 184 hair salon employees in 6 districts of Pusan city,
and the non-exposed group comprised 119 individuals living in the same areas.
They reported that the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among Korean
hairdressers was 59.9% in the neck, 76.6% in shoulders, 41.2%upper back, 72.2% lower
back, 31.3% arm and elbow, 44.2% wrist, 35.0% finger, and 71.1% in legs (24).
According
to the study by Hokm Abadi, the prevalence of disorders in
different parts of the body was as follows: 8% in the wrist, 20% the neck, 36%
shoulders, 46% back, and 84% in the legs (25). In a similar study by Miri, the prevalence of WRMSD
in different regions
of body was
as follows: 21% in the neck, 31% shoulders, 6% wrist, 54% back, and 69% in the
legs (26).
On the
other hand, in the present study, the results of REBA indicate that a high
percentage of hairdressers
are at high to very high risk of MSDs. Only about 46% of the 1032 postures were
classified as the action category/level 3 (high risk) and about 14.9% of the
postures were classified as action level 4 (very high risk) which requires
immediate corrective change in postures, but about 34.4% of the postures were
classified as action level 2 (medium risk) by REBA. Results of a similar study
conducted by Hokm Abadi showed that about 56% of the postures related to the right
side of the body were classified as medium level and about
30%
as high level, but
about 76% of the postures
related to the left side of the body were
classified as medium level and about 16% as high level using REBA (25). Furthermore, the results
of the study by Miri showed that about 42% of the
postures related to the right side of the body were classified
as medium level and about38% as high level, but about 46% of the postures
related to the left side of the body were classified as medium level and about
40% as high
level using REBA (26).
Nevertheless, in the research by Frvarsh, about 27.6% of the postures were classified
as action level 2-3 (medium risk-high risk) using REBA
(27).
The
results of this study showed a significant correlation between BMI and MSDs in
the elbow, hip, and thigh. The finding of this study revealed a significant correlation
between age and MSDs in the knee, shoulder, and neck.
Moreover,
the results of this study showed a significant correlation between REBA score and
MSDs in the neck, wrist, hip, and thigh.
The study by Miri demonstrated a significant correlation between
duration of work and MSDs in the leg (26). It also showed a significant correlation
between REBA score and MSDs in the legs and wrist (26).
According
to the research by Best, 70% of hairdressers suffered from MSDs (28). In
addition, uncomfortable working posture and standing for a long period of time
are the greatest causes of MRMSDs in hairdressers (28).
Uncomfortable
working posture, standing for a long period of time, unsuitable tools and
equipment such as unsuitable chairs, clipper, razors, blow-dryer, and scissors,
and working with a shoulder or shoulders raised, bending forward or sideways,
bending the head forward or sideways, and twisting the neck can led to high
risk score in hairdressers.
Conclusions
With regard to the results
obtained in this study, it is concluded that the hairdressers are at high risk
of MSDs. Furthermore, in order to reduce WRMSDs, risk level should be reduced though
design and using of ergonomic and appropriate tools and equipment.
Acknowledgment
This
study was supported by the Nutritional Health Research Center of Lorestan
University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran, and the authors would like
to acknowledge the support from this research center.
Conflict
of interest: Non declared
References:
1-
Riihimaki H,
Viikari-Juntura E. Musculoskeletal system. In: Stellman JE, editors. Encyclopedia
of Occupational Health and Safety. 4th ed. Geneva: International
Labour Office 1998; 6:1–35.
2-
Pinar T, Cakmak ZA,
Saygun M, Akdur R, Ulu N, Keles I, Saylam HS. Symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders
among ammunition factory workers in Turkey. Arch Environ Occup Health 2013;
68(1):13-21.
3-
Mandiracioglu A, Kose S, Gozaydin
A, Turken M, Kuzucu L. Occupational health risks of
barbers and coiffeurs in Izmir. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2009; 13(2):92-6.
4-
Leino T, Kahkonen E,
Saarinen L, Henriks-Eckerman ML,
Paakkulainen H. Working conditions and health in hairdressing salons. App Occup
Environ Hyg 1999; 14(1):26-33.
5- Guo HR. Working hours spent on repeated activities and prevalence
of back pain. Occup Environ Med 2002; 59(10):680-8.
6-
Tsigonia A, Tanagra D, Linos A,
Merekoulias G, Alexopoulos EC. Musculoskeletal
disorders among cosmetologists.
Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009; 6(12):2967-79.
7- Borg
G. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception
of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990; 16(1):55-8.
8- Hamberg-van
Reenen HH, Ariëns GA, Blatter BM, Van Mechelen W,
Bongers PM. A systematic review of the
relation between physical capacity and future low back and neck/shoulder pain.
pain 2007; 130(1-2):93-107.
9- Ariëns G, Bongers P, Douwes M, Miedema M, Hoogendoorn W, Van der
Wal G, et. al. Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk
factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study. J Occup Environ
Med 2001; 58(3):200-7.
10- Sjøgaard G, Lundberg U, Kadefors R. The role of muscle
activity and mental load in the development of pain and degenerative processes
at the muscle cell level during computer work. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000;
83(2-3):99-105.
11- Chobineh AR. Human factors in industry and manufactory
(ergonomic). Shiraz, Iran: Rahbord 1996.
12- Levy BS, Wegman DH, Baron SL, Sokas RK. Occupational and
environmental health: recognizing and preventing disease and injury. 6th
edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins 2006; 488-516.
13- Fang
HL, Chen RCC, Fang HP, Xu De Q. An ergonomic approach to an investigation into
the risk factors leading to work related musculoskeletal disorders for
Taiwanese hairdressers Mont fort University, UK Styling and Cosmetology Departmant,
Transworld Institute of Technology, Taiwan 2007; 30:1-10.
14- Caren M .Ergonomomics-A BUZZ word. The perventive Angle 2002;
1(1):1-5.
15- Malone RE. Ergonomomics, policy, and the ED nurse. J Emerg Nurs
2000; 26(5):514-5.
16- Nasl-Saraji
J, Fahol M, Golbabaei F, Lahmi M, Alimohammadi I. Assessment and evaluation of
posture by RULA in an electronics and electricity manufactory in 2002. Iran
Occupational Health Journal 2007; 4(3-4):10-17.
17- Ghamari
F, Mohamadbeigi A, Khodayari M. Work station revision by ergonomic posture
analyzing of arak bakery workers. Journal of Zanjan University of Medical
Sciences 2010; 18(70):81-90.
18- Habibi
E, Poorabdian S, Ahmadinejad P, Hassanzadeh A. Ergonomic risk assessment by
REBA method. Iran Occupational Health Journal 2007; 4(3-4):35-43.
19- Hignett
S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon 2000;
31(2):201-5.
20- Winkle
J, Westgaard RH. A model for solving work related musculoskeletal problems in a
profitable way. Appl Ergon 1996; 27(2):71-7.
21- Motamedzade M, Ashuri MR, Golmohammadi R,
Mahjub H. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from rapid
entire body assessment and quick exposure check in an engine oil company. J Res
Health Sci 2011; 11(1):26-32.
22- Mussi G, Gouveia N. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal
disorders in Brazilian hairdressers. Occup Med 2008; 58(5):367-9.
23- Chuang
W. A research on the Musculoskeletal Disorders of Hairdressers in Beauty
Salons. Journal of Cheng-Shiu University Taiwan 2005; 18: 65-70.
24- Chen
HC, Chang CM, Liu YP, Chen CY. Ergonomic risk factors for the wrists of hairdressers. Appl Ergon
2010; 41(1):98-105.
25- Hokmabadi RA, Esmailzadeh Kavaki M, Mehdinia M. Hairdressers by
reba (Rapid ergonomic postures of evaluation of entire body assessment. Journal
of North Khorasan University of Medical Science 2012; 3(4):49-54.
26- Miri MR, Hosseini MH, Sharifzadeh GR. Evaluation of ergonomic postures of
hairdressers by REBA in Birjand. Quarterly of the Horizon Medical Sciences 2008;
14(2):39-44.
27- Foruresh E, Mazlomi A, Habibi-Mohraz M,
Taghavi-Shahri SM, Suri Sh, Moharrami S. Ergonomic evaluation of body postures and effective risk factors
contributing musculoskeletal disorder in barbers in SARDASHT.
Journal of Health and safety at work 2012; 1(2):45-50.
28- Best M, French GM, Cianter J. Work- related musculoskeletal
disorders in hairdressers. Journal of occupational Health and Safety 2002;
1(18):66-7.
* Corresponding author: Sakineh Mahdavi, Dept. of Occupational
Health Engineering, School of Health, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences,
Khorramabad, Iran.
Email
Address: smahdavi125@yahoo.com