Journal of Occupational
Health and Epidemiology
Rafsanjan university Of medical sciences
Volume 8, Issue 3 (Summer 2019)
J Occup Health Epidemiol 2019, 8(3): 134-140 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Prasad R. Selection of internal safety auditors in an Indian construction organization based on the SWARA and ARAS methods . J Occup Health Epidemiol 2019; 8 (3) :134-140
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-344-en.html
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-344-en.html
Related article in
Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Similar articles
Sr. Assocate Prof., National Institute of Construction Management and Research (NICMAR), Hyderabad, Telangana, India. , sunku.vsrp@gmail.com
Article history
Received: 2019/03/8
Accepted: 2019/10/15
ePublished: 2020/01/23
Accepted: 2019/10/15
ePublished: 2020/01/23
Subject:
Occupational Health
Abstract: (4145 Views)
Background: The effectiveness and adequacy of occupational health and safety management system should be monitored and evaluated at organization level on a regular basis. Safety audit has a clear role in the development of organizations safety management systems. Internal safety audit is a method to appraise to the management the current status of occupational health and safety at workplace. Selection of internal safety auditors is a crucial decision making process which depend on several criteria. The purpose of the study was to select internal auditors among the safety officers in a construction organization using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method.
Materials and Methods: The study is based on the subjective evaluation of performance criteria by decision makers and 19 safety officers eligible to conduct safety audit were considered. Finally, six safety officers were considered for the position of internal safety auditors. The SWARA method was applied to calculate weights for criteria of selection and ARAS method was adopted to rank the safety officers.
Results: Seven criteria were considered as per the requirement of the organization and calculated the weights. The overall performance index was calculated based on criteria weights to rank the safety officers.
Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that the SWARA and ARAS methods are useful to select the internal safety auditors. The analysis is simple and can be adopted in practical in situations where the number of criteria varies.
Materials and Methods: The study is based on the subjective evaluation of performance criteria by decision makers and 19 safety officers eligible to conduct safety audit were considered. Finally, six safety officers were considered for the position of internal safety auditors. The SWARA method was applied to calculate weights for criteria of selection and ARAS method was adopted to rank the safety officers.
Results: Seven criteria were considered as per the requirement of the organization and calculated the weights. The overall performance index was calculated based on criteria weights to rank the safety officers.
Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that the SWARA and ARAS methods are useful to select the internal safety auditors. The analysis is simple and can be adopted in practical in situations where the number of criteria varies.
Keywords: Safety Management [MeSH], Occupational Health [MeSH], Safety Culture [MeSH], Management Audit [MeSH], Risk [MeSH]
References
1. Indian Standard. Code of Practice on Occupational Safety and Health Audit. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards; 1998. 16 p. Report No.: 14489. Available from: https://ia801602.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.law.is.14489.1998/is.14489.1998.pdf
2. Wolfe J, Brun J. Internal Audit Best Practices for Environment, Safety, Risk, and Quality. Montreal, Canada: Nimonik Inc: cited 2019. 19 p. Report No.: 1-888-608-7511. [Article]
3. Robson LS, Clarke JA, Cullen K, Bielecky A, Severin C, Bigelow PhL, et al. The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review. Saf Sci 2007; 45(3):329-53. [Article] [DOI]
4. Kuusisto A. Safety management systems – Audit tools and Reliability of auditing [PhD thesis]. Tampere, Finland, Tampere University of Technology; 2001. [Article]
5. Allford L. Internal Auditing of Process Safety. Chem Eng Trans 2016; 53: 313-18. [Article]
6. Keng TCh, Razak N. Case Studies on the Safety Management at Construction Site. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 2014; 9(2):90-108. [Article]
7. Gardziota T. A New Work Safety Management System in Construction Sites. Organization and Management 2014; 62:21-30.
8. Escobar Rivera D, Simon Villar A, Salzar Marrero JI. Auditors Selection and Audit Team Formation in Integrated Audits. Quality – Access to Success 2017; 18(157):65-71.
9. Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishi M, Marino MA. Case study: Application of Multicriteria Decision Making to Urban Water Supply. J Water Resour Plan Manag 2005; 131(4):326-35. [Article] [DOI]
10. Hajkowicz S. Higgins, A. A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 2008; 184:255-65. [Article] [DOI]
11. Kersuliene V, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step - wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management 2010; 11(2): 243-58. [Article] [DOI]
12. Zolfani SH, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. Design of Products with Both International and Local Perspectives based on Yin-Yang Balance Theory and SWARA Method. Journal of Economic Research 2013; 26(2):153-66. [Article] [DOI]
13. Aghdaie MH, Zolfani SH, Zavadskas EK. Decision making in machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods. Economics of Engineering 2013; 24(1): 5-17. [Article] [DOI]
14. Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Ukio Technological and Economic Development 2010; 16(2): 159-72. [Article] [DOI]
15. Baybutt P. Competency requirements for process safety auditors. Process Safety Progress 2015; 34(2):179-82. [DOI]
16. International Organization for Standardization. Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems. Geneva Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2018 Jul. 46 p. Report No.: 19011. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/70017.html
17. Shahadat H, Salam KMA. Basic Approach of an Electrical Safety Assessment in RMG Industries: Development of Electrical Hazards. Paper presented at: The 10th Global Engineering, Science and Technology Conference; 2015 Jan 2-3; Dhaka, Bangladesh.
18. Stanujkic D, Đordević B, Đordević M. Comparative Analysis of Some Prominent MCDM Methods: A Case of Ranking Serbian Banks. Serbian Journal of Management 2013; 8(2):213-41. [Article] [DOI]
19. Zavadskas EK, Sušinskas S, Daniūnas A, Turskis Z, Sivilevičius H. Multiple criteria selection of pile-column construction technology. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2012; 18(6):834-42. [Article] [DOI]
20. Bakshi T, Sarkar B. MCA Based Performance Evaluation of Project Selection. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications 2011; 2(2):14-22. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
