Volume 11, Issue 2 (Spring 2022)                   J Occup Health Epidemiol 2022, 11(2): 99-105 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zakeri M A, Ahmadinia H, Hossini Rafsanjanipoor S M. Clinical and Epidemiological Features of COVID-19 Patients in Rafsanjan County, Iran: A Secondary Data based Study. J Occup Health Epidemiol 2022; 11 (2) :99-105
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-466-en.html

Related article in
Google Scholar

1- M.Sc in Nursing, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Occupational Environmental Research Center, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
3- M.Sc in Epidemiology, Social Determinants of Health Research Center , Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. , mhosseini622@gmail.com
Article history
Received: 2021/09/1
Accepted: 2022/01/9
ePublished: 2022/06/22
Subject: Epidemiology
Full-Text [PDF 434 kb]   (630 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1801 Views)
Full-Text:   (124 Views)
Introduction
Many pneumonia cases of unknown etiology emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, whose clinical signs and symptoms greatly resembled those found in viral pneumonia [1]. Accordingly, a new coronavirus was identified as a pathogen, designated by the WHO as COVID-19 [2,3]. The coronavirus attracted attention worldwide due to its being greatly communicable in terms of common infection and quick dissemination. Pretty soon, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) as an emergency for public health and regarded it as an international concern [4, 5]. COVID-19, with high pathogenicity and a rapid spread, caused fear and anxiety in society and citizens [6,7]. Evaluation and identification of clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 can help make proper decisions and control the epidemic. Thus, to control the COVID-19 pandemic more successfully, it is required to explore information about COVID-19 patients meticulously. Globally, as of 06:07 pm (CEST), October 21, 2021, there have been 241,886,635 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 4,919,755 deaths, having been reported to the WHO. Iran is one of the regions with the highest rate of COVID-19, and as of October 21, 2021, there have been 5,821,737 confirmed cases and 124,585 mortalities of COVID-19 [8]. Even though the amount of research on COVID-19 is growing globally, most studies are from China, the United States, and Europe [9-16]. Few studies from developing countries, such as Iran, have reported clinical and epidemiological features of this disease. In the present study, we aim to specify features of the COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized at the Ali-Ibn Abitaleb Hospital affiliated with Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences in Rafsanjan County. This cross-sectional study aims to evaluate clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 patients in the Rafsanjan County within the time or period from February 11 to September 21, 2020.  In fact, primary diagnosis based on early clinical signs can play a key role in further managing and warding off the infection, specifically in regions with restricted availability of quick testing [17].

Materials and Methods
A secondary data based design was created to analyze and explore clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 confirmed cases, which were determined by the positive results of the RT-PCR test (Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction). Besides, suspected cases were determined by suspicious clinical signs and chest CT scans among Rafsanjan citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Data from 3,212 suspected cases and confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the Ali-Ibn Abitaleb Hospital in Rafsanjan County were analyzed. In addition, suspected cases were diagnosed by internal and infectious disease specialists and confirmed patients by positive results of the PCR test. The sampling method was a census. According to the data obtained from the hospital, all cases who were referred to the hospital from February 11, 2020, to September 21, 2020, were included in this study.
The present study, with a descriptive cross-sectional and epidemiological design, was conducted on hospitalized COVID-19 patients (suspected and confirmed cases) at the Ali-Ibn Abitaleb Hospital in Rafsanjan County. All data of this study were collected based on hospital reports of the care data monitoring system belonging to the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. The variables examined in this study included demographic information (age, sex, etc.) and information about the method of referral to the hospital, contact history, previous history of infections, clinical symptoms associated with the disease (fevers, coughs, nausea, O2Sat, etc.) and records of comorbidities. In addition, definitive diagnosis of the patients was confirmed by RT-PCR using throat and nose swab samples from the URT (upper respiratory tract), or it was done clinically based on lung imaging data, specifically thoracic CT, or other suspicious symptoms.
The study variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics, such as frequency tables and percentages. Moreover, statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 22.0. Additionally, logistic regression coefficients were employed to assess the effect of numerous variables on the probability of deaths from COVID-19. All demographic variables, clinical symptoms, and underlying diseases were included in the model. Next, using the backward selection method, the intended variables are entered into the model.
This study was confirmed by the Ethics Committee of the Human Research Department at Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR.RUMS.REC.1399.006).

Results
The Mean ± SD of the subjects' age was 48.67 ± 21.11 years. In the time period from February 11, 2020 to September 21, 2020, a total of 3,212 cases were referred to the hospital, with most of whom (1,679) (52.3%) having been male. The male-to-female ratio was 1:09, which means 11 men were infected for every ten women. The largest number of the patients (2,897 cases) (90.2 %) referred to the hospital in the form of personal referrals, and the lowest number (7 cases) (0.2%) was related to ambulances at governmental centers. Most of the patients fell in the age group of 40-49. In addition, among them, 2,534   cases (78.9%) had a history of contact with a COVID-19 patient. Regarding clinical symptoms associated with the disease, the three common clinical symptoms were fevers (1,477 cases) (46%), muscular pain (1,431 cases) (44.6%), and coughs (1,092 cases) (34%) (Table 1). In addition, the most common comorbidity was hypertension (253 cases) (7.9%), and the least common comorbidity was HIV/AIDS (3 cases) (0.1%).

Table 1. Frequency distribution of age, gender, underlying diseases, referral, contact history, and clinical symptoms in suspected cases and confirmed patients with COVID19 who were referred to the Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital in Rafsanjan County in the time from February 11, 2020 to September 21, 2020
Variable Frequency (percent) Variable Frequency (percent)
Age <10 year 56 (1.70) Gender Female 1533 (47.70)
10-19 140 (4.40) Male 1679 (52.30)
20-29 467 (14.50) Referral
Private Ambulance 11 (0.30)
30-39 677 (21.10) Governmental Ambulance 7 (0.20)
40-49 479 (14.90) EMS 297 (9.20)
50-59 389 (12.10) Personal 2897 (90.20)
60-69 382 (11.90) Clinical Symptoms Fevers 1477 (46.00)
70-79 298 (9.30) Coughs 1092 (34.00)
>80 302 (9.40) Muscular Pain 1431 (44.6)
Indeterminate 22 (0.70) Respiratory Distress 856 (26.70)
Underlying Disease Cancer 41 (1.30) Loss of Consciousness 102 (3.20)
Chronic Liver Disease 17 (0.50) Decreased Sense of Smell 11 (0.30)
Diabetes 239 (7.40) Decreased Sense of Taste 2 (0.10)
Chronic Blood Disease 44 (1.40) Seizure 15 (0.50)
HIV/AIDS 3 (0.10)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Disease 11 (0.30) Headache 151 (4.70)
Heart Disease 161 (5.00) Vertigo 22 (0.70)
Chronic Kidney Disease 62 (1.90) Paresthesia 9 (0.30)
Asthma 20 (0.60) Plegia 1 (0.00)
Chronic Respiratory Disease 158 (4.90) Chest Pain 38 (1.2)
Chronic Neurological Disorders 61 (1.90) Dermatitis 2 (0.1)
Other Chronic Diseases 151 (4.70) Abdominal Pain 33 (1.0)
Hypertension 253 (7.90) Nausea 85 (2.6)
Pregnancy 24 (0.70) Vomiting 97 (3.0)
Contact History Yes 678 (21.10) Diarrhea 66 (2.10)
No 2534 (78.90) Anorexia 46 (1.40)

According to Table 2, 100 cases (6%) of male patients and 79 cases (5.2%) of female patients died. Besides, the chi-square test demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the death ratio between male and female patients. The mean age of the two groups of suspected cases and confirmed patients was compared using the independent t-test. Accordingly, it was found that the mean age of the confirmed patients was significantly higher than that of the group of suspected cases (P < 0.001). Moreover, the mean age of the survived patients was significantly higher than that of the group of deceased ones (P < 0.001).

Table 2. The mean, median, and standard deviation of age according to disease status (suspected or confirmed), death status (deceased or non-deceased), as well as gender frequency according to death status (deceased or non-deceased) in COVID-19 patients who were referred to the Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital in the Rafsanjan County in the time from February 11, 2020 to September 21, 2020
Variable Variable levels Frequency (percent) Median Mean ± SD P-value*
Disease Status Suspicious 2525 (79.15) 44 47.84 ± 21.52 <0.001*
Confirmed 665 (20.85) 50 51.84 ± 19.16
Sum 3190 (100) 45 48.67 ± 21.11
Death Status Deceased 3014 (94.48) 44 47.50 ± 20.58
Non-Deceased 176 (5.52) 73 68.77 ± 19.90
Gender Variable Levels Deceased Non-deceased P-value**
Frequency (percent) Frequency (percent)
Female 79 (5.20) 1454 (94.80)
Male 100 (6.00) 1579 (94.00)
Sum 179 (5.60) 3033 (94.40)
Because some variables were not recorded for some people (missing data), the sum of the levels is not the same for different variables. *Independent t-test;  ** Chi-square test;  P < 0.05 (being the significant level for all tests)
As Table 3 shows, 107 cases (4.2%) of suspected cases and 72 cases (10.8%) of confirmed patients died [CFR (Case Fatality Rate) =10.8%]. Furthermore, using the chi-square test, it was found that the death ratio in confirmed patients was significantly higher than that in suspected cases (P < 0.001).
Besides, 63 cases (2.5%) of patients without underlying diseases, 47 cases (13.6 %) of patients with an underlying disease, and 69 cases (20.4%) of patients with at least two underlying diseases died. Using the chi-square test, it was found that the death ratio in patients with at least two underlying diseases was significantly higher than that in the other two groups (P < 0.001) (Table 3). In addition, using logistic regression, it was found that the chance of death in infected males was 16% higher than that in females (OR = 1. 166).

Table 3. Case fatality rates (CFR) in COVID-19 patients with and without co-infections who were referred to the Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital in Rafsanjan County in the time period from February 11, 2020, to September 21, 2020
Variable Variable Levels No Disease
Frequency (percent)
One Disease
Frequency (percent)
At Least Two Disease Frequency (percent) P-value*
Death Status Deceased 63 (2.50) 47 (13.60) 69 (20.40) < 0.001
Non-Deceased 2465 (97.50) 299 (86.40) 269 (79.60)
Sum 2528 (100) 346 (100) 338 (100)
Variable Variable Levels Deceased
Frequency (percent)
Non-deceased
Frequency (percent)
P-value*
Disease Status Suspicious 107 (4.20) 2440 (95.80) < 0.001
Confirmed 72 (10.80) 593 (89.20)
Sum 179 (5.60) 3033 (94.40)
* Chi-square test; p < 0.05 (significance level for all tests)
The logistic regression model was employed to assess the effect of various variables on the probability of death from COVID-19. To this end, all demographic variables, clinical symptoms, and underlying diseases were included in the model; next, using the backward selection method, the intended variables were kept in the model (Table 4). Table 4 shows the logistic regression, standard error, odds ratio, confidence interval, and significance level for each variable. With a one-year increase in age, the chance of death increased by 4% (P < 0.001) (OR [95% CI] = 1.039 [1.019–1.060]). Besides, for a one-unit increase in the blood oxygen level (O2Sat), the chance of death decreased by 6% (P < 0.001) (OR [95% CI] = 0.938 [0.909–0.968]). In addition, the chance of death in people with reduced levels of consciousness was 5.5 times higher than that in other patients (P < 0.001) (OR [95% CI] =5.531 [2.650–11.546]). Besides, the chance of death in people with cancer was 9.1 times higher than that in other people (P < 0.001) (OR [95% CI] =9.142 [2.789–29.969]). In fact, this chance was 2.5 times higher in diabetics (P=0.004) (OR [95% CI] = 2.504 [1.340–4.680]) and 2.5 times in people with chronic respiratory diseases (P=0.011) (OR [95% CI] = 2.510 [1.237–5.094]) than in other people.

Table 4. The relationship between (OR, CI ) age, gender, and underlying diseases in suspected and confirmed COVID-19 patients who were referred to the Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital in Rafsanjan County in the time period from February 11, 2020, to September 21, 2020
Variable B S.E. P-value OR 95% CI for OR
Lower Upper
Age 0.039 0.010 <0.001* 1.039 1.019 1.060
O2Sat -0.064 0.016 <0.001* 0.938 0.909 0.968
Temperature 0.312 0.197 0.113 1.366 0.929 2.008
Loss of Consciousness 1.710 0.375 <0.001* 5.531 2.650 11.546
Cancer 2.213 0.606 <0.001* 9.142 2.789 29.969
Diabetes 0.918 0.319 0.004* 2.504 1.340 4.680
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.911 0.508 0.073 2.487 0.919 6.729
Chronic Respiratory Disease 0.920 0.361 0.011* 2.510 1.237 5.094
Constant -11.457 7.523 0.128 0.000
B = Regression coefficient;   S.E = Standard Deviation;     OR = Odds Ratio;   CI = Confidence Interval

Discussion
Based on the results of this study, until September 21, 2020, a total of 3,212 suspicious cases and confirmed patients were referred to the hospital. In addition, COVID-19 affected males more than females; these results were in line with those of previous studies [18-20]. Various reasons have been suggested in this regard. Li et al stated that
the distribution of the male-to- female ratio could be due to the effect of sex hormones and that the X-chromosome has a key role in adaptation as well as that inherent safety of society
[21]. In addition, it is supposed that owing to the Iranian culture, males have more personal contacts due to working outside the home than females who are often at home.                                 

According to the results of this study, the highest age range of patients at the time of the study was related to the middle-aged (40-49). With a one-year increase in age, the chance of mortality increases by 4%. However, with the disease spreading throughout the world and given new mutations, the disease spreads among different ages. Regression analysis in the present study indicated that a greater risk of death accompanied older ages. Research suggests that older age has a lower potential for the immune system [22]. In previous studies, old ages have been mentioned as a risk factor for death in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) [23] and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) [24]. The most common clinical symptoms in this study included fevers (1,477 cases) (46%), muscular pain (1,431 cases) (44.6%), and coughs (1,092 cases) (34%). This was similar to the COVID-19 infection in Asian cases mostly accompanied by fevers and coughs [25, 26]. Regardless of the usual symptoms, such as fevers, muscular pain, and the like [27-29], our findings demonstrated that many patients had unusual signs, like abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. In a European study conducted by Lechien et al, migraine, anosmia, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion were reported as the most frequently observed symptoms, followed by common symptoms. However, these differences in virus presentation could be due to changes in the genotype or presentation level of virus receptors.
In the present study, 2,534 COVID-19 patients (78.9%) had a history of contact with another COVID-19 patient, having been observed in most the similar studies. Therefore, a history of contact does not seem to be a prerequisite for suspected patients to be diagnosed with COVID-19.
Moreover, the most common comorbidity was hypertension in 253 cases (7.9%), consistent with previously reported findings [20, 30]. Fang et al suggested a theory implying that the coronavirus binds to its target via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) expressed by epithelial cells in kidneys, lungs, and blood vessels. According to him, the infection can increase the risk of contracting acute COVID-19 in people consuming ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II Type-I receptor blockers (ARBs) [31-33].
According to the results of the present study, 100 cases (6%) of male patients and 79 cases (5.2%) of female patients died. Hence, no statistically significant difference was observed in the male-to-female death ratio among the patients (P = 0.32). In addition, logistic regression found that the chance of death in infected men was 16% higher than that in infected women (P = 0.32). However, it appears that women are less liable to unexpected side-effects of viral infections than men based on their different inherent immunity, steroid hormones, and parameters about sex chromosomes. Immune regulatory genes encoded by the female X chromosome can be predisposed to lower viral load levels, so less inflammation occurs in women than in men [34]. Women are more likely to be affected by the post-infection smell dysfunction in viral infections about parainfluenza, Epstein–Barr virus, or the previous form of coronavirus affecting males [35].
While the CFR of COVID-19 has been highly varied in different countries, the mortality rate among confirmed patients (CFR) was 10.8% in this study, which was lower than the national CFR among hospitalized patients in Iran (24.4%) [36].
The results of this research indicated that with a unit of increase in blood oxygen levels, the odds of death decreased by 6% (P < 0.001), being in line with the study of Haghighi M. et al. Thus, having hypoxia (with O2 saturation < 90% ) was significantly associated with the mortality rate (OR [95% CI]=11.41 [3.07–42.47]) [37]. Therefore, frequent noninvasive ventilation, high-flow nasal oxygen, and prone position could be used in respiratory caregiving to produce improved results [12, 38, 39]. The chance of mortality in cancer patients was 9.1 times higher than in other patients (P < 0.001). In fact, cancer patients are considered a highly vulnerable subgroup of the population. According to research, cancer patients have a more acute course of the disease, with a higher proportion of such patients demanding greater amounts of intensive care, having a more quickly progressing disease, and having an increased risk of mortality [40].
Our final analysis used retrospective data and depended on the data obtained from hospital reports of the care data monitoring system belonging to the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education, being a limitation in this study. As a result, the bias induced by confounded data from unobserved or unrecorded traits could have remained in our estimation of associations, so we cannot approve cause-effect relationships. Thus, it is recommended that similar studies be conducted for the last seven months and compared with the present study's findings.

Conclusion
A great part of the features of our cases resembled those reported in previous studies; thus, the present study's findings highlight the noticeable impact of age, gender, and underlying diseases on the likelihood of death among COVID-19 patients. Accordingly, these results can play an effective role in healthcare policymaking for COVID-19.

Acknowledgement
This study is part of research project no. IR.RUMS.98311 was conducted at Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. The researchers would like to thank all colleagues who gave constructive feedback.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References
1. Wang L, Wang Y, Ye D, Liu Q. Review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on current evidence. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(6):105948. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270-3. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al., A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727-33. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Aggarwal S, Garcia-Telles N, Aggarwal G, Lavie C, Lippi G, Henry BM. Clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Early report from the United States. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020;7(2):91-6. [DOI] [PMID]
5. Siordia JA Jr. Epidemiology and clinical features of COVID-19: A review of current literature. J Clin Virol. 2020;127:104357. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Kaljee L, Zhang L, Langhaug L, Munjile K, Tembo S, Menon A, et al. A randomized-control trial for the teachers’ diploma programme on psychosocial care, support and protection in Zambian government primary schools. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(4):381-92. [DOI] [PMID]
7. Zakeri MA, Hossini Rafsanjanipoor SM, Kahnooji M, Ghaedi Heidari F, Dehghan M. Generalized Anxiety Disorder during the COVID-19 Outbreak in Iran: The Role of Social Dysfunction. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021;209(7):491-6. [DOI] [PMID]
8. World Heahlth Organization.WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed March 4, 2020.
9. Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, Hardwick HE, Pius R, Norman L, et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1985. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Vena A, Giacobbe DR, Di Biagio A, Mikulska M, Taramasso L, De Maria A, et al. Clinical characteristics, management and in-hospital mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Genoa, Italy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(11):1537-44. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Chen P, Zhang Y, Wen Y, Guo J, Jia J, Ma Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 136 cases of COVID-19 in main district of Chongqing. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(7):1180-4. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):475-81. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Mez J, Daneshvar DH, Kiernan PT, Abdolmohammadi B, Alvarez VE, Huber BR, et al., Clinicopathological Evaluation of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Players of American Football. JAMA. 2017;318(4):360-70. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Faury H, Courboulès C, Payen M, Jary A, Hausfater P, Luyt C, et al. Medical features of COVID-19 and influenza infection: A comparative study in Paris, France. J Infect. 2021;82(2):e36-9. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Nachtigall I, Lenga P, Jóźwiak K, Thürmann P, Meier-Hellmann A, Kuhlen R, et al. Clinical course and factors associated with outcomes among 1904 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Germany: an observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(12):1663-9. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Maechler F, Gertler M, Hermes J, van Loon W, Schwab F, Piening B, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infections at a testing site in Berlin, Germany, March and April 2020-a cross-sectional study. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2020;26(12):1685.e7-1685.e12. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(3):105924. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L, et al. Time Course of Lung Changes at Chest CT during Recovery from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiology. 2020;295(3):715-21. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Shahriarirad R, Khodamoradi Z, Erfani A, Hosseinpour H, Ranjbar K, Emami Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in the South of Iran. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):427. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061-9. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Hassan SA, Sheikh FN, Jamal S, Ezeh JK, Akhtar A. Coronavirus (COVID-19): A Review of Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7355. [DOI]
22. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk Factors Associated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(7):934-43. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Hong KH, Choi JP, Hong SH, Lee J, Kwon JS, Kim SM, et al. Predictors of mortality in Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Thorax. 2018;73(3):286-9. [DOI] [PMID]
24. Choi KW, Chau TN, Tsang O, Tso E, Chiu MC, Tong WL, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in 267 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(9):715-23. [DOI] [PMID]
25. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-42. [DOI] [PMID]
26. Cao Y, Liu X, Xiong L, Cai K. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(9):1449-59. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Wu J, Wu X, Zeng W, Guo D, Fang Z, Chen L, et al. Chest CT Findings in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Its Relationship with Clinical Features. Invest Radiol. 2020;55(5):257-61. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):846-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Chen J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV- a quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(2):69-71. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMCID]
31. Li XC, Zhang J, Zhuo JL. The vasoprotective axes of the renin-angiotensin system: physiological relevance and therapeutic implications in cardiovascular, hypertensive and kidney diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2017;125(Pt A):21-38. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. J Virol. 2020;94(7):e00127-20. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):e21. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
34. Conti P, Younes A. Coronavirus COV-19/SARS-CoV-2 affects women less than men: clinical response to viral infection. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34(2):339-43. [DOI] [PMID]
35. Suzuki M, Saito K, Min WP, Vladau C, Toida K, Itoh H, et al. Identification of viruses in patients with postviral olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(2):272-7. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. Jalili M, Payandemehr P, Saghaei A, Sari HN, Safikhani H, Kolivand P. Characteristics and Mortality of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Iran: A National Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(1):125-7. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Haghighi M, Hatami H, Aryannezhad S, Delbarial N. Risk Factors of Mortality among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in A Large University Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Infect Epidemiol Microbiol. 2021;7(2):141-54. [DOI]
38. Wang K, Zhao W, Li J, Shu W, Duan J. The experience of high-flow nasal cannula in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in two hospitals of Chongqing, China. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):37. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
39. Elharrar X, Trigui Y, Dols AM, Touchon F, Martinez S, Prud'homme E, et al. Use of Prone Positioning in Nonintubated Patients with COVID-19 and Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2336-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
40. European Society For Medical Oncology (ESMO). Cancer Patient Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Geneva, Switzerland: European Society For Medical Oncology; . Available from: https://www.esmo.org/guidelines/cancer-patient-management-during-the-covid-19-pandemic

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2025 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb