Volume 12, Issue 4 (Autumn 2023)                   J Occup Health Epidemiol 2023, 12(4): 278-288 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1401.868


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbaslou H, Alaei Z, Safari M, Alboghobeish A, Salehi Sahlabadi A. The Effect of Computer Vision Syndrome on Sleep Quality in Users of Digital Displays: A Systematic Review. J Occup Health Epidemiol 2023; 12 (4) :278-288
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-757-en.html

Related article in
Google Scholar

1- M.Sc. in Occupational Health Engineering, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3- Ph.D. Student in Occupational Health, Dept. of Occupational Health and Safety at Work, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Assistant Prof., Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Dept. of Occupational Health and Safety at Work, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , asalehi529@gmail.com
Article history
Received: 2023/06/10
Accepted: 2023/10/8
ePublished: 2023/12/15
Full-Text [PDF 430 kb]   (519 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2037 Views)
Full-Text:   (345 Views)
Introduction
Computers and displays have become an indispensable aspect of daily activities for individuals. They have evolved into essential devices for all areas of life, and currently, their extensive utilization as an instrument for teaching and learning is prevalent in schools and universities (1, 2).
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid shift towards digitalization worldwide, resulting in a significant increase in the number of users of digital display devices. This change in perspective has been driven by the guidelines for social distancing by the World Health Organization, which in turn have prompted the development of various digital innovations such as teleconferencing and online commercial platforms (3, 4). The pandemic has also significantly impacted the education sector, leading most countries to adopt online classes as a preventive measure (5). Consequently, individuals affected by the pandemic have shifted most of their work activities online, resulting in prolonged usage of computers and mobile phones for online purposes (5, 6).
The increased use of cell phones, including Smartphone, has raised concerns about potential health risks, as several studies have linked cell phone usage with health outcomes such as malignant melanoma of the eyes, headaches, and brain tumors (7). Moreover, prolonged and continuous use of computers and digital screens has resulted in a condition known as CVS. The American Optometric Association (AOA) defines CVS as a collection of vision and eye problems experienced during or after using digital devices (8). Common symptoms of CVS include headaches, blurred vision, double vision, eye fatigue, watery eyes, light sensitivity, and dry eyes (9).
CVS is widely regarded as one of the most significant occupational hazards of the 21st century, and its symptoms impact a significant proportion of computer users, depending on the studied population (7, 9-11). The prevalence of CVS varies based on the group studied, and the methods used to evaluate CVS range from 25% to over 90%. Approximately 60 million individuals who utilize computers around the globe are afflicted with Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS), and nearly one million additional cases are identified annually (5, 9, 12, 13).
The symptoms of CVS can be attributed to ocular causes, such as uncorrected refractive errors and visual abnormalities. Additionally, they may arise from ergonomic causes, such as poor sitting position, unsuitable screen distance and angle, poor display resolution and contrast, insufficient brightness, and an imbalance between the display and environmental lighting (5, 9, 14-16).
The AOA recommends limiting the continuous use of digital devices to two hours per day to prevent eye and vision problems. The protracted utilization of these instruments not solely engenders tension in the visual system but can also induce musculoskeletal
compression and disturbance of the circadian cycle.
(17).

Long-term exposure to electronic devices such as computer screens and mobile phones can disrupt normal sleep patterns, leading to insufficient sleep, poor performance at work and school, reduced productivity, lack of energy, increased risk of weight gain, and depression (9, 18, 19). Numerous studies have shown that exposure to artificial light at night can negatively impact sleep quality and daytime alertness. Additionally, the adverse effects of disrupted sleep quality and alertness can manifest physically as neck and eye tension, eye fatigue, headache, and impaired cognitive function (20 -24).
Most studies have focused on investigating the impact of screen use on eye health. However, some studies have explored the relationship between sleep quality and the occurrence of symptoms related to CVS. Notably, no comprehensive review has been conducted on the connection between CVS and sleep quality. So, this study aims to review the existing literature on the relationship between CVS and sleep quality and summarize recent findings in this area.

Materials and Methods
A systematic review is a method used to address specific research questions by comprehensively identifying and summarizing all relevant studies in a given topic area, thereby providing an up-to-date synthesis of the existing knowledge.
The systematic review outlined in this paper adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Search Strategy: The Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles, and a combination of keywords such as sleep, sleep disorders, sleep quality, insomnia, awakening, asleep, nightmare, dreams, sleep deprivation, sleep loss, circadian, computer vision syndrome, and CVS were used. The electronic database searches were executed on May 5, 2023, encompassing publications from 1900 to 2023 to ensure the inclusion of potentially valuable studies. Title, abstract, and keywords were the fields considered in the queries. Furthermore, we limited our search to documents available in English and Persian. Table 1 indicates the search strategy in each of the databases. Search in Google Scholar was performed using its Advanced Search Feature.

Table 1. Search queries in each of the databases
Database Search query
PubMed ("sleep"[Title/Abstract] OR "sleep disorders"[Title/Abstract] OR "sleep quality"[Title/Abstract] OR "Insomnia"[Title/Abstract] OR "awakening"[Title/Abstract] OR "asleep"[Title/Abstract] OR "nightmare"[Title/Abstract] OR "dreams"[Title/Abstract] OR "sleep loss"[Title/Abstract] OR "sleep deprivation"[Title/Abstract] OR "circadian"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("computer vision syndrome"[Title/Abstract] OR "cvs"[Title/Abstract])
Scopus (TITLE-ABS-KEY (sleep) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (sleep quality) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (sleep disorders) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (insomnia) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (awakening) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (asleep) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (circadian) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (nightmare) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (dreams) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (sleep loss) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (sleep deprivation)) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY (cvs) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (computer AND vision AND syndrome))
Web of science (TS= (cvs) OR TS= (computer vision syndrome)) AND (TS= (sleep) OR TS= (sleep quality) OR TS= (sleep disorders) OR TS= (insomnia) OR TS= (awakening) OR TS= (asleep) OR TS= (circadian) OR TS= (nightmare) OR TS= (dreams) OR TS= (sleep loss) OR TS= (sleep deprivation))
Eligibility Criteria: To evaluate the pertinence of each retrieved paper in addressing our research inquiries, we employed a set of inclusion criteria:
Original research that concurrently investigated both sleep quality and the occurrence of CVS, papers published in either English or Persian, and papers published in scientific journals.
Animal studies, studies not related to the research objective, systematic review and meta-analysis studies, theses, letters to editors, conference papers, and preprinted studies were excluded from this review.
Study Selection: Following the execution of database queries, we utilized Endnote® X8 to record references, and eliminate repeated records. Then, a manual review was conducted to eliminate any remaining duplicate entries further, creating a singular reference library.
We employed a multi-stage procedure to assess the papers in the initial database. This involved reviewing the titles, abstracts, and keywords, followed by thoroughly examining the full texts of selected papers. At each stage of the screening process, two authors independently evaluated the papers critically. Any documents selected by at least one reviewer were advanced to the next screening stage, taking an inclusive approach to reduce the likelihood of excluding pertinent papers. A third independent referee resolved any disagreements between the researchers.
In the final stage, we gathered the studies that met our inclusion criteria, which are the documents directly relevant to our research questions. To ensure complete confidence in their relevance, we thoroughly reviewed the full text of all articles initially identified as relevant. Subsequently, these selected articles were analyzed to explore the relationships between the variables of interest. Fig. 1 provides a concise overview of the intermediate selection process and the steps leading to the creation of the final database.

Results
Fig. 2 illustrates the process of article selection in this study. Initially, 1346 articles were obtained from various databases, with 345 duplicates. After screening the remaining articles based on title and abstract, 949 were excluded for being irrelevant or review articles. The eligibility of the entire texts of 52 remaining articles was assessed, resulting in 17 cross-sectional studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. The total number of participants included in these studies was 36,192.

Fig. 1. Cloud of words presented in the complete texts of the articles

Fig. 2. Search Strategy
The temporal distribution of the studies showed that most of them were conducted in 2020 and later. It is worth noting that most of these studies were conducted in Asia and Africa, with 15 studies in Asia and 2 in Africa and Europe. Researchers from various countries have conducted these studies, with India having the highest number of studies (5). Regarding the study population, 12 studies were conducted among students, 4 among the general public, and 1 among health center employees.
Several indicators have been employed in assessing participants' sleep quality in the studies, with three of them relying on the Pittsburgh Questionnaire. The CVS questionnaire has been utilized in eleven studies to evaluate eye symptoms. Furthermore, six studies have utilized distinct questionnaires included in this review due to their association and overlap with CVS. The details of the studies analyzed in this review are presented in Table 2.
Fig. 3. Cloud of words presented in the complete texts of the articles
 
Table 2. Summary of the included papers
Main Result Sample size Eye measurement tools Sleep measurement tools/indices Community Country Year Study design Author
Individuals with a family history of sleep problems have an increased risk of CVS. 917 CVS questionnaire Insomnia Postsecondary Students Bangladesh 2022 Cross-Sectional Roy et al.(5)
People who sleep less tend to have more eye issues.
715 self-reported ocular symptoms:  vision blurring, redness,
visual disturbance, secretion, inflammation, lacrimation
and dryness
Sleep duration adolescent subjects South Korea 2015 Cross-Sectional Kim et al.(7)
Most women with dry eyes struggle with serious sleep problems.
547 Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) 10item Mini Sleep Questionnaire to
check the quality of sleep
collegegoing women India 2021 Cross-Sectional Gupta et al.(51)
The chi-square test revealed a significant association between CVS and sleep quality. 391 CVS questionnaire PSQI questionnaire Undergraduate students Ghana 2021 Cross-Sectional Akowuah et al.(9)
81.4% (N = 459) had poor sleep quality
4.4% of the students did not have any CVS symptoms.
564 CVS questionnaire PSQI
questionnaire
health science students Saudi Arabia 2021 Cross-Sectional Ahmad et al.(8)
All the components of the PSQI score, except components 1 and 6, had statistically significantly (P < 0.05) higher values in individuals with CVS than individuals without CVS. 500 CVS questionnaire PSQI
questionnaire
medical students India 2019 Cross-Sectional Patil et al.(2)
As screen time went up, the frequency and intensity of symptoms and sleep disturbances also statistically significantly increased. 407 CVS questionnaire Sleep disturbances individuals above 18
using digital devices
India 2020 Cross-Sectional Bahkir et al.(21)
As visual display terminal (VDT) working times increased, so did the risk of eye discomfort, headaches, high job stress, and poor sleep quality. However, VDT working time was not associated with statistically significant differences in CVS, BSRS-5 score, burnout, overall health self-assessments, or sleep duration. 945 + 1868
CVS questionnaire BSRS-5

Self-assessment sleep quality question
Health Care Workers Taiwan 2022 Cross-Sectional Tsou et al.(30)
The analysis showed that for every 1 h increase in the patients’ total daily sleep time, their likelihood of developing eye discomfort symptoms decreased by 23%;
The severity of eye discomfort symptom was significantly negatively related to the increased total sleep duration
686 eye discomfort
symptom questionnaire
the length of daily sleep Medical students China 2022 Cross-Sectional Liu et al.(32)
The study found that a lower sleeping duration is associated with CVS, and In the CVS group, the average sleep duration was shorter 527 CVS questionnaire Sleep duration students studying in a virtual
classroom
Thailand 2022 Cross-Sectional Wangsan et al.(3)
CVS was significantly associated with insomnia. Stress mediated the relationship between CVS and insomnia. 749 CVS questionnaire Lebanese Insomnia Scale (LIS-18) all digital device users Lebanon 2022 Cross-Sectional Akiki et al.(54)
There is no significant relationship between disturbed sleep and CVS 416 CVS questionnaire Disturb sleep individuals visiting a shopping mall Saudi Arabia 2018 Cross-Sectional Al subai et al.(33)
As compared to their peers without asthenopia, those students with asthenopia tended to sleep less 25781 CVS questionnaire Sleep time 8–20 years old students China 2021 Cross-Sectional Li et al(34)
30 % low vision Drowsiness: 17.86 out of 40 70 Low vision drowsiness graduate students Iran 2013 Cross-Sectional Hesam et al(56)
63% had sleep disturbance, and 76.9% of study subjects experienced Cvs symptoms. 108 ocular
symptoms
sleep disturbance students India 2021 Cross-sectional Cacodcar et al.(35)
(73.8%) were classified into the group with DES participants with DES slept fewer hours (P¼0.025) 851 (1) Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire,
(2) Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI),
(3) 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5),
(4) 8-item CL Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8)
hours of sleep university
students
Spain 2022 Cross-sectional Talens-Estarelles et al.(31)
70% of students have clinical insomnia of moderate severity.
More than 70% of students had severe eye symptoms in some cases
150 Prevalidated questionnaire on symptoms of computer vision syndrome Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire medical undergraduates India 2020 Cross-sectional Lakshmi et al(29)
Discussion
The widespread use of electronic devices has resulted in computer vision syndrome (CVS) emerging as a noteworthy health issue for individuals. In addition to its impact on ocular health, excessive use of digital screens has been found to affect other areas, such as sleep quality. The current investigation aims to extensively analyze existing scholarly literature to examine the relationship between Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) and the quality of sleep experienced by individuals who use digital devices.
Numerous investigations have been conducted to assess CVS symptoms and sleep quality. A cross-sectional study conducted in Thailand aimed to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of computer vision syndrome (CVS) among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research revealed that the occurrence of CVS among the 527 participants was 81%, with increased screen time being suggested as the main cause. The study also found that female participants, those with atopic diseases, those with prior ocular symptoms, and those with astigmatism were more likely to develop CVS. The study suggests that students should use a desktop or laptop computer rather than a mobile phone, adjust screen brightness and environment to reduce reflection and glare and wear proper optical correction for refractive errors. The investigation additionally indicates that educational institutions ought to organize sufficient intervals between instructional sessions and communicate these guidelines to students to forestall computer vision syndrome during classes (3).
Furthermore, a recent study conducted in Bangladesh found that 68.16% of post-secondary students experienced computer vision syndrome (CVS) symptoms due to the increased usage of digital devices for online education and entertainment during the COVID-19 pandemic. The symptoms that are most frequently observed are headache, feeling of worsening eyesight, and eye pain. The study also identified various factors associated with the development of CVS, including the use of mobile or tablet devices, participating in continuous online education for a period exceeding 12 hours per day, with no breaks or insufficient breaks, while having a history of eye problems or headaches in one's family or personal background (5). Additionally, another study found that none of the samples investigated had sufficient sleep quality (25).
Studies conducted among students and general communities have reported similar findings, as indicated (5, 21).  Healthcare staff also experience a high prevalence of CVS symptoms, with rates exceeding 46% despite variations in exposure hours and job categories. Furthermore, over 50% of participants reported poor sleep quality (27).
Most studies investigating the relationship between CVS and sleep quality have concentrated on student populations, possibly due to their higher exposure to electronic devices. Despite variations in reported values for CVS and sleep quality across different methods and populations studied, the incidence of CVS and poor sleep quality remains consistently high regardless of society or occupational group (28). Furthermore, with the growing use of electronic devices, the incidence of these issues will probably continue to increase.
Numerous studies have investigated the potential impact of monitor usage on CVS symptoms (21, 25, 27-32). Research has shown a positive correlation between the frequency and duration of monitor usage and the occurrence of visual discomfort and related symptoms. Liu et al. employed statistical models to investigate this relationship and found that reducing monitor usage by one hour is associated with a 16% decrease in the likelihood of experiencing vision-related disorders (29).
Extended use of monitors in non-ergonomic positions has been associated with various vision problems, including dryness and eye discomfort. For example, when users excessively elevate the height of their monitors, it alters their line of sight and increases corneal exposure to air. Consequently, there is an increase in eye fluid evaporation, reduced tear film quality, and the development of dry eyes (29, 33, 34). Furthermore, prolonged monitor use has been found to decrease the normal blinking rate, with some studies reporting rates as low as 3.6 blinks per minute compared to the average rate of 18.4 blinks per minute (26, 30, 34-36). This reduction in blinking rate may be attributed to increased screen focus and decreased secretion capacity of the eye glands, resulting in an uneven distribution of tears on the eye's surface (37, 38).
Several studies have investigated the relationship between screen time and sleep quality (25, 30, 31). As instance, a review article highlighted that 90% of the studies examined found a connection between screen time and reduced sleep duration (39). Moreover, individuals who dedicate an extended period to engaging with electronic displays are more prone to encountering disturbances in their sleep patterns (9).
The impact of screen light on the circadian rhythm of individuals is well-documented. The retina comprises light-sensitive neurons called ipRGCs that estimate the brightness levels in the environment (40). The retinohypothalamic tract, which originates from these ipRGCs, regulates melatonin secretion (41). In other words, the melanopsin photoreceptors in the eye transmit information to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, which contains neurons that regulate the circadian rhythm by controlling melatonin secretion from the pineal gland in response to
environmental conditions, particularly light and darkness
(42). Melatonin, in turn, governs the physiological regulation of sleep.

Due to their durability and stability, LEDs have become the most prevalent display and light-emitting source in electronic devices such as computers and mobile phones (2). Although the emitted light is commonly perceived as white, the peak of the LED emission is in the blue light spectrum, which is similar to the peak sensitivity of melatonin suppression (43). Consequently, this light is detected by photoreceptors and transmitted via the retinohypothalamic tract to the SCN. Exposure to this light, which has a wavelength close to that of melatonin suppression, obstructs melatonin secretion, resulting in disruptions to people's circadian rhythm (2).
In addition to disturbing the circadian rhythm, using electronic devices can lead to increased engagement in virtual environments, resulting in delayed sleep and continued mental activity even after bed (44). Furthermore, prolonged exposure to digital screens can cause muscle pain, further interfering with the sleep process (45).
In a study conducted by Kim et al., the Korean adult community reported a significant relationship between the duration of sleep and the incidence of visual symptoms (7). In another study, sleep duration was lower in people with CVS (3). Gupta et al. found a similar relationship between dry eyes and sleep quality among female students (47). Notably, more than 65% of individuals reporting dry eyes also had severe sleep problems, in line with a study that linked insufficient sleep to higher rates of severe dry eyes (48). Liu et al. developed a model to examine the relationship between sleep duration and eye discomfort syndrome and found that for each hour increase in sleep duration, the likelihood of eye discomfort syndrome decreased by 23% (33). Another model demonstrated a notable correlation between reduced duration of sleep and heightened severity of eye discomfort.
Studies have shown that sleep disorders and inadequate sleep can lead to increased tear osmolarity, decreased tear film break-up time, and reduced tear secretion, all of which can cause or intensify ocular surface diseases (49). Sleep disorders also impact the function of the lacrimal glands, resulting in reduced tear secretion. Sleep disorders also affect the function of the lacrimal glands, leading to reduced tear secretion. Furthermore, discomfort and visual weakness may persist when the eye muscles do not have sufficient recovery time during sleep (3).
As previously discussed, there is a correlation between digital device usage and both CVS and sleep quality. Moreover, all studies indicate a direct relationship between CVS and poor sleep quality, which may be attributed to excessive screen time and the released blue light emission. The influence of other factors may
further intensify this correlation. For example, Akiki et al. found that the presence of stress can significantly amplify the impact of CVS on migraine and insomnia. Specifically, the relationship between CVS and migraine can increase by 53%, while the relationship between CVS and insomnia can rise to 80%
(50). Furthermore, inappropriate ergonomic practices can also increase the likelihood of CVS symptoms and poor sleep quality in individuals (51).

The studies conducted among students and general communities have reported similar findings, indicating that the incidence of CVS and poor sleep quality remains consistently high regardless of society or occupational group. Furthermore, with the growing use of electronic devices, the incidence of these issues will probably continue to increase. Therefore, it is crucial to develop educational and corrective programs to mitigate CVS symptoms and promote healthy sleep habits.
Since ocular issues and sleep disruptions can have detrimental impacts on various physical and cognitive domains, resulting in work fatigue and decreased performance during tasks, neglecting to address the conditions of utilizing digital displays and devices may threaten an individual's professional or academic trajectory. Hence, raising awareness among individuals about the potential risks of excessive screen time and the importance of taking breaks, adjusting screen brightness, and using proper optical correction for their refractive errors is essential. Additionally, it is necessary to implement ergonomic practices and develop policies that promote healthy digital device usage to reduce the incidence of CVS and poor sleep quality. Therefore, it is crucial to develop educational and corrective programs to mitigate CVS symptoms and promote healthy sleep habits.
Based on the search results, the limitations of the research on the relationship between computer vision syndrome (CVS) and sleep quality in users of digital displays are not explicitly stated. However, some studies have identified factors that increase the risk of CVS, such as decreased sleep quality, high computer use duration, and a non-ergonomic position. Other studies have found a significant association between poor sleep quality and CVS. Additionally, some studies have reported a high prevalence of both CVS and poor sleep quality among undergraduate students. Therefore, it is important to consider these factors when interpreting the study's results on the relationship between CVS and sleep quality in users of digital displays.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the literature review has shown that the extensive use of electronic devices has led to an increase in Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) and a decline in sleep quality, which are related to the amount of digital device usage and the prolonged use of devices emitting blue light. The studies have consistently reported a direct relationship between CVS and poor sleep quality, which may be attributed to excessive screen time and the released blue light emission. The influence of other factors such as stress and inappropriate ergonomic practices may further intensify this correlation.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References
1. Fernández C, Argilés M, Pérez-CabréS E, Cardona G. Spectral radiance of blue light filters on ophthalmic lenses. Opt Pura Apl. 2017;50(2):165-72. [DOI]
2. Patil A, Bhavya, Chaudhury S, Srivastava S. Eyeing computer vision syndrome: Awareness, knowledge, and its impact on sleep quality among medical students. Ind Psychiatry J. 2019;28(1):68-74. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Wangsan K, Upaphong P, Assavanopakun P, Sapbamrer R, Sirikul W, Kitro A, et al. Self-Reported Computer Vision Syndrome among Thai University Students in Virtual Classrooms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevalence and Associated Factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):3996. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. World Health Organization. Advice for the Public: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2023. [Report]
5. Roy S, Sharif AB, Chowdhury S, Iktidar MA. Unavoidable online education due to COVID-19 and its association to computer vision syndrome: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022;7(1):e001118. [DOI] [PMCID]
6. Munsamy AJ, Naidoo S, Akoo T, Jumna S, Nair P, Zuma S, et al. A case study of digital eye strain in a university student population during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown in South Africa: evidence of an emerging public health issue. J Public Health Afr. 2022;13(3):2103. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Kim J, Hwang Y, Kang S, Kim M, Kim TS, Kim J, et al. Association between Exposure to Smartphones and Ocular Health in Adolescents. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016;23(4):269-76. [DOI] [PMID]
8. Ahmad AA, Alshehri BF, Almalki AM, Albaradi AM, Almalki MS, Alattas KY. Eyeing computer vision syndrome: Awareness, knowledge, and its impact on sleep quality among health sciences students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Dev Ctries. 2021;5(9):1647-54. [DOI]
9. Akowuah PK, Nti AN, Ankamah-Lomotey S, Frimpong AA, Fummey J, Boadi P, et al. Digital Device Use, Computer Vision Syndrome, and Sleep Quality among an African Undergraduate Population. Adv Public Health. 2021;2021:6611348. [DOI]
10. Ranasinghe P, Wathurapatha WS, Perera YS, Lamabadusuriya DA, Kulatunga S, Jayawardana N, et al. Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: an evaluation of prevalence and risk factors. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:150. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Charpe NA, Kaushik V. Computer vision syndrome (CVS): recognition and control in software professionals. J Hum Ecol. 2009;28(1):67-9. [DOI]
12. Randolph SA. Computer vision syndrome. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;65(7):328. [DOI] [PMID]
13. Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy JE. Computer vision syndrome: A review. Work. 2015;52(2):303-14. [DOI] [PMID]
14. Anshel JR. Visual ergonomics in the workplace. AAOHN J. 2007;55(10):414-20. [DOI] [PMID]
15. Sánchez-Brau M, Domenech-Amigot B, Brocal-Fernández F, Quesada-Rico JA, Seguí-Crespo M. Prevalence of computer vision syndrome and its relationship with ergonomic and individual factors in presbyopic VDT workers using progressive addition lenses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):1003. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Boadi-Kusi SB, Abu SL, Acheampong GO, Adueming PO, Abu EK. Association between poor ergophthalmologic practices and computer vision syndrome among university administrative staff in Ghana. J Environ Public Health. 2020;2020:7516357. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Bahkir FA, Grandee SS. Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on digital device-related ocular health. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(11):2378-83. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Singh S, Anderson AJ, Downie LE. Insights into Australian optometrists’ knowledge and attitude towards prescribing blue light-blocking ophthalmic devices. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39(3):194-204. [DOI] [PMID]
19. Smaldone A, Honig JC, Byrne MW. Sleepless in America: inadequate sleep and relationships to health and well-being of our nation's children. Pediatrics. 2007;119 Suppl 1:S29-37. [DOI] [PMID]
20. Stringham JM, Stringham NT, O’Brien KJ. Macular carotenoid supplementation improves visual performance, sleep quality, and adverse physical symptoms in those with high screen time exposure. Foods. 2017;6(7):47. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Hansraj KK. Assessment of stresses in the cervical spine caused by posture and position of the head. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:277-9. [PMID]
22. Toomingas A, Hagberg M, Heiden M, Richter H, Westergren KE, Tornqvist EW. Risk factors, incidence and persistence of symptoms from the eyes among professional computer users. Work. 2014;47(3):291-301. [DOI] [PMID]
23. Porcar E, Pons AM, Lorente A. Visual and ocular effects from the use of flat-panel displays. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(6):881-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMCID]
24. Chen J, Liang Y, Mai C, Zhong X, Qu C. General deficit in inhibitory control of excessive smartphone users: Evidence from an event-related potential study. Front Psychol. 2016;7:511. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Lakshmi V. Progress of medical undergraduates to an era of computer vision syndrome and insomnia as an aftermath of increased digitalization during covid-19 pandemic. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020;7(11):8225-33. [Article]
26. Tsou MT. Influence of Prolonged Visual Display Terminal Use on Physical and Mental Conditions among Health Care Workers at Tertiary Hospitals, Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):3770. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Talens-Estarelles C, Garcia-Marques JV, Cervino A, Garcia-Lazaro S. Dry Eye-Related Risk Factors for Digital Eye Strain. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(10):410-5. [DOI] [PMID]
28. Liu B, Jiang S, Li Z, Wang Y, Zhou D, Chen Z. Investigation and Analysis of Eye Discomfort Caused by Video Display Terminal Use Among Medical Students Studying at High-Altitude Regions. Front Public Health. 2022;10:900539. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Al Subaie M, Al-Dossari S, Bougmiza M. Computer vision syndrome among mobile phone users in Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Al-Basar Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;4(4):99-103. [Article] [DOI]
30. Li L, Zhang J, Chen M, Li X, Chu Q, Jiang R, et al. Contribution of total screen/online-course time to asthenopia in children during COVID-19 pandemic via influencing psychological stress. Front Public Health. 2021;9:736617. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Cacodcar JA, Raiturcar TP, Fernandes RRC, Dessai SR, Kantak VS, Naik R. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of computer vision syndrome among medical students in Goa. Epidemiol Int. 2021;6(1):9-14. [DOI]
32. Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A, Mitra S, Yee RW. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(3):253-62. [DOI] [PMID]
33. Mowatt L, Gordon C, Santosh ABR, Jones T. Computer vision syndrome and ergonomic practices among undergraduate university students. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(1). [DOI] [PMID]
34. Chidi-Egboka NC, Briggs NE, Jalbert I, Golebiowski B. The ocular surface in children: a review of current knowledge and meta-analysis of tear film stability and tear secretion in children. Ocul Surf. 2019;17(1):28-39. [DOI] [PMID]
35. Prabhasawat P, Pinitpuwadol W, Angsriprasert D, Chonpimai P, Saiman M. Tear film change and ocular symptoms after reading printed book and electronic book: a crossover study. Jap J Ophthalmol. 2019;63(2):137-44. [DOI] [PMID]
36. OCL Vision. The effects of computer use eye health and vision. London, United Kingdom: OCL Vision; 2017.
37. Tsubota K. Tear dynamics and dry eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1998;17(4):565-96. [DOI] [PMID]
38. Schlote T, Kadner G, Freudenthaler N. Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(4):306-12. [DOI] [PMID]
39. Hale L, Kirschen GW, LeBourgeois MK, Gradisar M, Garrison MM, Montgomery-Downs H, et al. Youth screen media habits and sleep: sleep-friendly screen behavior recommendations for clinicians, educators, and parents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018;27(2):229-45. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
40. Bauer M, Glenn T, Monteith S, Gottlieb JF, Ritter PS, Geddes J, et al. The potential influence of LED lighting on mental illness. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2018;19(1):59-73. [DOI] [PMID]
41. Gooley JJ, Lu J, Chou TC, Scammell TE, Saper CB. Melanopsin in cells of origin of the retinohypothalamic tract. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4(12):1165. [DOI] [PMID]
42. Benarroch EE. Suprachiasmatic nucleus and melatonin: reciprocal interactions and clinical correlations. Neurology. 2008;71(8):594-8. [DOI] [PMID]
43. Moderie C, Van der Maren S, Dumont M. Circadian phase, dynamics of subjective sleepiness and sensitivity to blue light in young adults complaining of a delayed sleep schedule. Sleep Med. 2017;34:148-55. [DOI] [PMID]
44. Vickers NJ. Animal communication: when i’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr Biol. 2017;27(14):R713-5. [DOI] [PMID]
45. Thomée S, Härenstam A, Hagberg M. Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults-a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:66. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
46. Talens-Estarelles C, García-Marqués JV, Cerviño A, García-Lázaro S. Dry Eye–Related Risk Factors for Digital Eye Strain. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(10):410-5. [DOI] [PMID]
47. Gupta PC, Rana M, Ratti M, Duggal M, Agarwal A, Khurana S, et al. Association of screen time, quality of sleep and dry eye in college-going women of Northern India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(1):51-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
48. Lee W, Lim SS, Won JU, Roh J, Lee JH, Seok H, et al. The association between sleep duration and dry eye syndrome among Korean adults. Sleep Med. 2015;16(11):1327-31. [DOI] [PMID]
49. Lee YB, Koh JW, Hyon JY, Wee WR, Kim JJ, Shin YJ. Sleep deprivation reduces tear secretion and impairs the tear film. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(6):3525-31. [DOI] [PMID]
50. Akiki M, Obeid S, Salameh P, Malaeb D, Akel M, Hallit R, et al. Association Between Computer Vision Syndrome, Insomnia, and Migraine Among Lebanese Adults: The Mediating Effect of Stress. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2022;24(4):21m03083. [DOI] [PMID]
51. Logaraj M, Madhupriya V, Hegde S. Computer vision syndrome and associated factors among medical and engineering students in Chennai. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(2):179-85. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
52. Hesam G, Aliabadi M, Farhadian M, Afshari Doust V. Stydy of ergonomic conditions in use of visual monitors and its relation to subjective feeling of fatigue in master science students of Hamadan University of medical science. Iran J Ergon. 2013;1(2):1-9. [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2025 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb