Volume 9, Issue 4 (Autumn 2020)                   JOHE 2020, 9(4): 213-218 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jafari M, Laei S, Kavyani E, Jalali R. Exploring Components, Barriers, and Solutions for Faculty Members’ Research Empowerment Programs Based on the CIPP Model: A Qualitative Study. JOHE. 2020; 9 (4) :213-218
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-412-en.html
1- PhD Student in Educational Management, Dept. of Educational Sciences, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Educational Sciences, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran. , susanlaei100@gmail.com
3- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Educational Sciences, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
4- Associate Prof., Dept. of Nursing, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Abstract:   (300 Views)

Background: Accurate knowledge of barriers and solutions for faculty members' research empowerment programs will lead to the promotion and development of universities. This study aimed to explore components, barriers, and solutions for faculty members’ research empowerment programs in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences based on the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model.
Materials and Methods: In this qualitative study, 15 faculty members, who had participated in research empowerment programs as participants and lecturers, were recruited using the purposive sampling method in 2020 based on semi-structured interviews. Analysis was performed using the content analysis method with MAXQDA software V.20.
Results: The results of the interviews were extracted in eight main categories, including four barriers and four solutions. The barriers included learners' problems, resource constraints, planning weaknesses, and performance weaknesses. The solutions included structural improvement, human resource improvement, workshop improvement, and performance improvement.
Conclusions: The results showed that there are barriers and solutions for improving research empowerment programs, which could be used for further improvement. It is recommended that this study be conducted in other universities to accurately identify barriers to executing research empowerment programs.

Full-Text [PDF 482 kb]   (169 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (106 Views)  
Short Report: Original Article | Subject: Epidemiology
Received: 2020/12/8 | Accepted: 2021/01/18 | ePublished: 2021/06/21

References
1. Sahraei RM, Erfani N, Shabanibahar G, Monsef Ali, Hosein Nezhad AA. The Relationship between Empowerment and Perceived Organizational Support Job Satisfaction of Physical Education Teachers in Hamedan. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies 2015; 2(6):81-91. [Article]
2. Hosseinpour J, Ebrahimi M. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Empowerment of the Staff of the I.R.I Police Special Forces. Resource Management in the Police 2018; 1397(21):161-86. [Article]
3. Mirmohammadi SM, Hosseinpour D, Ghasemi Banabari H. Key Success Factors of Employees' Empowerment in Cooperation. Management Studies in Development and Evolution 2017; 25(83):93-114. [DOI]
4. Fotohi M, Akbari A, Cherabin M, Maghool A. Presentation of Faculty Member’s Empowerment Model of Farhangian University. Quarterly Education Development of Jundishapur 2020; 11(2):219-32. [DOI]
5. Karimian Z, Abolghasemi M. Comparison between the Viewpoints of Faculty Members Regarding the Share of Scholarship Functions in Different Disciplines. Journal of Medical Education Development 2018; 11(29):63-76. [DOI]
6. Keshmiri F. Faculty Development course based on Project-based Approach: A Strategy for Implementing Educational Scholarship in Universities of Medical Sciences. The Journal of Medical Education and Development 2019; 14(3):208-197. [DOI]
7. Eslami N, Hoseini M, Makarem A, Gholami H. A Survey on the Effect of In-Service Training Courses on The Satisfaction, Educational, and Assessment Skills of the Academic Staff of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Mashhad Dental School 2020; 44(1):3-13. [DOI]
8. Bentley PJ, Kyvik S. Individual Differences in Faculty Research Time Allocations Across 13 Countries. Res High Educ 2013; 54(3):329-48. [DOI]
9. Stufflebeam DL, Coryn CLS. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: Wiley Press, 2014.
10. Lee SY, Shin JS, Lee SH. How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2019; 16:40. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Hamdipor A, Zavareghi R, Moradi S. A Pathologic Study of Knowledge-based Empowering Challenges between Humanities Faculty Members of Tabriz University. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities 2019; 11(2):129-50. [DOI]
12. Kian M. A Comparative Study of ICT Programs in Basic Education in Australia, Finland and Iran Iranian Journal of Comparative Education 2019; 2(3):383-406. [DOI]
13. Piwowar-Sulej K. Human resources development as an element of sustainable HRM – with the focus on production engineers. J Clean Prod 2021; 278:124008. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Ahmadi S, Sayyah Baragar M. Understanding Faculty Members Attitude on Empowerment Programs at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study. Quarterly Educational Development of Judishapur 2017; 8(3):356-66. [Article]
15. Hidaka BH, Asghar A, Aktipis CA, Nesse RM, Wolpaw TM, Skursky NK, et al. The status of evolutionary medicine education in North American medical schools. BMC Med Educ 2015; 15:38. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Mahboobi M, Kianoosh P, Abedisarvestani A. Barriers to Empowering Clients in Agricultural Employment Plans of the Imam Khomeini Relief Committee in Golestan Province. Quarterly Journal of Social Work 2018; 7(1):46-55 [Article]
17. Safdari R, Ghazisaeidi M, Ehtesham H, Robiaty M, Ziaee N. Barriers to Research in Medical Sciences from the Viewpoints of Faculty Members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences in 2012. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 2016; 15(6):515-26. [Article]
18. Assadullahi F, Shakeri M, Barzegar Bafrooei K. The Process of Forming Professional Development Challenges for Faculty Members of Ghazni University, Afghanistan. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education 2019, 2(3):362-82. [DOI]
19. khodabakhshzadeh S, Amirzadeh Moradabadi S, khodabakhshzadeh S, Baniasadi M. The Study of Factors Affecting Productivity of Human Resources; Barriers and Solutions: (Case study: Education Deputy University of Medical Sciences Bam). Quarterly Educational Development of Judishapur 2015; 6(4):323-31. [Article]
20. Mohammadi M. Identifying the effecting factors of education staffs empowerment in Tehran city based on Karakok. Journal of Science and Engineering Elites 2017; 1(2); 1-19.
21. Ekanayaka WI, Ellis R. Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition? System 2020; 94:102341. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb