Volume 5, Number 3 (Summer 2016)                   JOHE 2016, 5(3): 151-159 | Back to browse issues page



PMCID: 0

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahdavi S, Rasti Pisheh P, Jozekanaani M. Safety assessment of glycol recovery unit in a gas refinery by failure mode and effects analysis technique. JOHE. 2016; 5 (3) :151-159
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-201-en.html

MSc in Occupational Hygienist Governing Health Section, HSE Main Office, National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC), Tehran, Iran , jozekanaani@nigc.ir
Abstract:   (312 Views)

Background: The reliability and safety of gas refineries are strongly associated with the reliability of other parts of the system. Defect and failure in one part of a system can cause total system breakdown or accident. The failure and damage in these equipment such as transformers and boilers results in not only the equipment damage and human injuries but also productivity reduction. The purpose of this study was safety assessment of glycol recovery unit in gas refinery by failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) technique.

Materials and Methods: The present study is a descriptive-analytical study done for risk assessment of glycol recovery unit of a gas refinery in one of the southern areas of Iran. FMEA method was used to identify and detect possible failures in the system. Failure modes of a component and their causes were identified and effects of identified failures were examined, then the necessary corrective measures were recommended.

Results: In this research, 105 failure modes were studied. The highest risk priority number (RPN) values obtained were 150 (while removing corrosion and welding inside TK601A/B vessel which was due lack of air ventilation) and 120 (while installing the gasket).

Conclusions: FMEA technique is a useful method to prevent accidents and increase safety and productivity. FMEA can identify and assess potential risks and propose corrective action required to control the risks.

Full-Text [PDF 363 kb]   (98 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (43 Views)  
Type of Study: original article | Subject: Occupational Health

References
1. Kalantarnia M, Khan F, Hawboldt K. Modelling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach. Process Saf Environ Prot 2010; 88(3):191-9.
2. Adl J. Safety performance in the industry and its close relationship with Occupational Health. Journal of Industry and Safety 1992; 21:30-35.
3. Adl J, Mohseni M. Assessment of the effectiveness of detection techniques to identify existing hazards in the industry. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research 2012; 10(1):25-32.
4. Wang Y, Cheng G, Hu H, Wu W. Development of a risk-based maintenance strategy using FMEA for a continuous catalytic reforming plant. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2012; 25(6):958-65.
5. Carbone TA, Tippett DD. Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal 2004; 16(4):28-35.
6. Chauhan A, Malik RK, Sharma G, Verma M. Performance evaluation of casting industry by FMEA ‘A case study’. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Applications Research 2011; 2(2): 113-21.
7. Arabian-Hoseynabadi H, Oraee H, Tavner PJ. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2010; 32(7):817-24.
8. Dudek-Burlikowska M. Application of FMEA method in enterprise focused on quality. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 2011; 45(1):89-102.
9. Sultan Lipol L , Haq J. Risk analysis method: FMEA/FMECA in the organizations. International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2011; 11(5):49-57.
10. Guevara Carazas FJ, Martha de Souza GF. Availability analysis of gas turbines used in power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics 2009; 12(1):28-37.
11. Nejadali H, Mortazavi SB, Khavanin A. LPG storage spheres risk assessment with FMEA and ETBA. Journal of Kermansha University of Medical Sciences (Behbood) 2008; 12(2):180-9.
12. Alimohammadi I, Adl J. The comparison of safety level in kilns in two gypsum production factories by Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Iran Occupational Health Journal 2008; 5(1,2):77-83.
13. Ghahremani A, Adl J, Nasl Seraji J. Process equipment failure mode analysis in a chemical industry. Iran Occupational Health Journal 2008; 5(1,2):31-8.
14. Heidari MH, Salmani H, Nazari Y. Usage of Failure Mode & EffectAnalysis Method (FMEA) forsafety assessment in a drug manufacture. Iran Occupational Health Journal 2006; 3(1):70-5.
15. Arvanitoyannis IS, Varzakas TH. Application of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and cause and effect analysis for industrial processing of common octopus (Octopus
16. Narayanagounder S, Gurusami K. A new approach for prioritization of failure modes in design FMEA using ANOVA. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2009; 3(1):73-80.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb