Volume 5, Number 3 (Summer 2016)                   JOHE 2016, 5(3): 168-175 | Back to browse issues page



PMCID: 0

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karimi Zeverdegani S, Barakat S, Yazdi M. Chemical risk assessment in a chemical laboratory based on three different techniques. JOHE. 2016; 5 (3) :168-175
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-205-en.html

MSc in Occupational Health Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. , s_barakat@hlth.mui.ac.ir
Abstract:   (261 Views)

Background: The use of chemicals is essential in education resulting in exposure to these pollutant in a variety of chemical and research laboratories. Chemical contaminants in chemical laboratories are in different forms and chemical exposure risk assessment is important for choosing appropriate controls in protecting the health of operators, experts and students. For risk assessment in chemical exposures, several techniques were introduced that their use should be assessed. This research was done with the aim to introduce the most appropriate technique in chemical risk assessment by using three chemical risk assessment techniques.

Materials and Methods: This was a descriptive research done in one chemical laboratory. This research had been defined in several stages: in the first phase, the list of solid and liquid chemicals were prepared and full physicochemical properties of substances as well as toxicity and health risk of them were collected. Finally Chemical Risk Management Self-Assessment Model (Chem-SAM), University Of Wollingong (UOW) risk assessment and semi-quantitative risk assessment method (SQRA) methods were used and compared.

Results: There was significant difference between SQRA methods and UOW technique while no significant difference was observed between SQRA methods and Chem-SAM model.

Conclusions: All three techniques are simple, but the results were similar in SQRA methods and Chem-SAM model, so these two methods can be replaced in chemical risk assessment. In order to control the identified risks, this research has recommended programs, control measures, improving local exhaust ventilation systems, personal protective equipment and training of personnel.

Full-Text [PDF 407 kb]   (103 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (51 Views)  
Type of Study: original article | Subject: Occupational Health

References
1. Herber RFM, Duffus JH, Christensen JM, Olsen E, Park MV. Risk assessment for occupational exposure to chemicals: A review of current methodology. Pure Appl Chem 2001; 73(6):993-1031. [Article]
2. Beheshti MH, Firoozi Chahak A, Alinaghi Langari AA, Rostami S. Semi-quantitative risk assessment of health exposure to hazardous chemical agents in a petrochemical plant. Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology 2015; 4(1):1-8. [Article]
3. Singapoure. Ministry of Manpower. Occupational Safty and Health Division. A semi-quantitative method to assess occupatiobal exposure to harmful chemicals. Singapoure: Occupational Safty and Health Division, 2014. Report No.: 059764. [Report]
4. Australia, Safe Work Australia. How to manage work health and safety risks. Codes of Practice. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2011. [Report]
5. Hong Kong. Occupational Safety and Health Branch, Labour Department. Chemical safety in the workplace. Guidance notes on risk assessment and fundamentals of establishing safety measures. Hong Kong: The Commissioner for Labour, Labour Department; 2001. [Report]
6. Greim H, Snyder R. Toxicology and risk assessment: a comprehensive introduction. 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2008. [Book]
7. Australia, Safe Work Australia. Managing risks of hazardous chemicals in the workplace. Codes of Practice. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2012. [Report]
8. 8. Swiss.World Health Organization. International Labour Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme Who human health risk assessment toolkit: chemical hazards. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2012. Harmonization Project Document No.: 8. Available from: [Project]
9. Australia, Safe Work Australia. Managing risks to health and safety at the workplace fact sheet. Codes of Practice. Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2012. [Report]
10. Wang SM, Wu TN, Juang YJ, Dai YT, Tsai PJ, Chen CY. Developing a semi-quantitative occupational risk prediction model for chemical exposures and its application to a national chemical exposure databank. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10(8):3157-71. [PubMed]
11. Chemical Security Program. Chemical risk management self-assessment model (Chem-SAM). Chemical Security Program. [Internet] . [updated ; cited ]. Available from: www.csp-state.net/resources/chem-sam/ [References]
12. Laboratory Work Risk Assessment. Australia: University of Wollongong, School of Chemistry; 2003 Aug. [References]
13. Hunadia Husina SN, Mohamad AB, Sheikh Abdullah SR, Anuar N. Chemical health risk assessment at the chemical and biochemical engineering laboratory. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2012; 60:300-7. [sciencedirect]
14. Bai YQ, Lv LH, Wang T. The application of the semi-quantitative risk assessment method to urban natural gas pipelines. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 2013; 6(2):74-7. [Article]
15. Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelin. Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessment. Enbridge Northern Gateway Project. Calgary, Alberta Canada: Worley Parsons Canada Services Ltd.; 2013. Project No.: 407016-00013. Available from:http://ceaa.gc.ca/050/documents/p21799/85851E.pdf
16. Karimi A, Jamshidi Slukloei HR, Eslamizad S. Designing SQCRA as a software to semi-quantitative chemical risk assessment in workplace. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering 2014; 1(2):47-56. [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb