Journal of Occupational
Health and Epidemiology
Rafsanjan university Of medical sciences
Volume 8, Issue 3 (Summer 2019)
J Occup Health Epidemiol 2019, 8(3): 123-128 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sohbet R, Yeşilyurt B, Birimoglu Okuyan C. The impact of ergonomic conditions on factory workers’ self-esteem in Turkey. J Occup Health Epidemiol 2019; 8 (3) :123-128
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-347-en.html
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-347-en.html
Related article in
Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Similar articles
1- Postdoctoral Researcher, Assistant Prof. of Public Health Nursing, Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
2- Nurse, MSc, Sehltkamil State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.
3- Postdoctoral Researcher, Assistant Prof., of Public Health Nursing,Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey. ,cananbirimoglu@gmail.com
2- Nurse, MSc, Sehltkamil State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.
3- Postdoctoral Researcher, Assistant Prof., of Public Health Nursing,Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey. ,
Article history
Received: 2019/04/24
Accepted: 2019/10/15
ePublished: 2020/01/23
Accepted: 2019/10/15
ePublished: 2020/01/23
Subject:
Occupational Health
Abstract: (3566 Views)
Background: Working time accounts for a great deal of an individual worker’s life. This study aims to examine the impact of ergonomic conditions on the self-esteem of workers in Gaziantep, Turkey.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted recruiting 755 workers from two factories and verbal informed consent was obtained from the workers. Data were obtained from groups using a self-report form (63 items) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (10 items).
Results: of 755 workers, 38.3% were aged 26–30 yrs, and 97.2% were male. In addition, 75.4% of the workers reported that they did not have an ergonomic working environment, and 87.4% of low self-esteem workers did not adopt correct posture when working (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Most of the workers did not adopt correct posture when working and did not enjoy an ergonomic working environment. Based on the results, creating such an environment would benefit the workers.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted recruiting 755 workers from two factories and verbal informed consent was obtained from the workers. Data were obtained from groups using a self-report form (63 items) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (10 items).
Results: of 755 workers, 38.3% were aged 26–30 yrs, and 97.2% were male. In addition, 75.4% of the workers reported that they did not have an ergonomic working environment, and 87.4% of low self-esteem workers did not adopt correct posture when working (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Most of the workers did not adopt correct posture when working and did not enjoy an ergonomic working environment. Based on the results, creating such an environment would benefit the workers.
Keywords: Ergonomics [MeSH], Workplace [MeSH], Environment and Public Health [MeSH], Occupational Health [MeSH]
References
1. Koinis A, Giannou V, Drantaki V, Angelaina S, Stratou E, Saridi M. The Impact of Healthcare Workers Job Environment on Their Mental-emotional Health. Coping Strategies: The Case of a Local General Hospital. Health Psychol Res 2015; 3(1):1984. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Srivastava Sh, Kanpur R. A Study on Quality of Work Life: Key Elements & It’s Implications. IOSR Journal of Business and Management 2014; 16(3):54-9. [DOI]
3. Uglanova E., Dettmer J. Sustained Effects of Flexible Working Time Arrangements on Subjective Well-Being. J Happiness Stud 2018; 19(6):1727-48. [Article] [DOI]
4. Zaidi U, Fahmi Hammad L, Saad Awad S, Ali Elkholi SM, Diouri Qasem H. Relationship of Ergonomics, lifestyle, and Job Satisfaction among Sonographers in Riyadh, KSA. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences 2018; 17(3):127-34. [Article] [DOI]
5. Mostafa NS, Momen M. Occupational Health and Safety Training: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Technical Education Students. Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine 2014; 38(2):153-65. [Article] [DOI]
6. Pingle S. Occupational safety and health in India: now and the future. Ind Health 2012; 50(3):167-71. [DOI] [PMID]
7. Chandrasekar K. Workplace Environment and its Impact on Organizational Performance in Public Sector Organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems 2011; 1(1). Paper ID: ISSN22308849-V1I2M4-012011 [Article]
8. Gallagher M, Muldoon OT, Pettigrew J. An integrative review of social and occupational factors influencing health and wellbeing. Front Psychol 2015; 6:1281. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, New Jersey, United States: Princeton University Press; 1965.
10. Giraudo M, Bena A, Leombruni R, Costa G. Occupational injuries in times of labour market flexibility: the different stories of employment-secure and precarious workers. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:150. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Huzaimah Sahari S, Yaman Yusup M, Affidah M, Aiza J. Exploring Working Environment as a Stressor for Adult Students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2013; 101(8):564-74. [Article] [DOI]
12. Thiese MS, Hanowski RJ, Kales SN, Porter RJ, Moffitt G, Hu N, et al. Multiple Conditions Increase Preventable Crash Risks among Truck Drivers in a Cohort Study. J Occup Environ Med 2017; 59(2):205-11. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Caruso CC. Negative ımpacts of shiftwork and long work hours. Rehabil Nurs 2014; 39(1):16-25. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Vimalanathan K, Ramesh Babu T. The effect of indoor office environment on the work performance, health and well-being of office workers. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2014; 12:113. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Mohammadizadeh M, Ahmadi SH, Sekhavati E, Ahani-Jegar K.. Noise pollution effect in flour factory on workers’ hearing in Lamerd city. J Med Life 2015; 8(3):208-11. [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Gulduran E, Ergül Ş, Erkin Ö. Perceptions of Health Status and the İmportance of Health in Coal Enterprise Workers. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2013; 12(4):383-92. [DOI]
17. Pandit B, Albert A, Patil Y, Al-Bayati AJ. Fostering Safety Communication among Construction Workers: Role of Safety Climate and Crew-Level Cohesion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 16(1). [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Bleidorn W, Arslan RC, Denissen JJ, Rentfrow PJ, Gebauer JE, Potter J, et al. Age and gender differences in self-esteem-A cross-cultural window. J Pers Soc Psychol 2016; 111(3):396-410. [DOI] [PMID]
19. Ovidiu-Iliuta D. Employee motivation and organizational performance. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research 2013; 5(1):53-60. [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
