Volume 9, Issue 4 (Autumn 2020)                   JOHE 2020, 9(4): 248-256 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shahsavari Goqreri E, Ziaaddini M, Hadavinejad M, Taboil H. An Interpretive Structural Model to Improve the Safety Performance of Employees of Industrial and Mining Plants in Shahr-e-Babak City, Iran. JOHE. 2020; 9 (4) :248-256
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-416-en.html
1- PhD Student, Dept. of Management, Rafsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Management, Rafsanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan, Iran. , m.ziaaddini@yahoo.com
3- Associate Prof., Dept. of Management, Valiasr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran.
4- Associate Prof., Dept. of Management, Payam Noor University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Abstract:   (298 Views)

Background: Today, occupational safety play the vital role to reduce the number of accidents. In other words, it is necessary to pay attention to improving the safety performance of employees in organizations. Indeed, safety performance is part of safety activities, describing the behavioral aspect of employees and being influenced by various factors. The purpose of this research is to provide a structural interpretation model for improving the safety performance behavior of employees in the industrial and mining city of Shahr-e-Babak.
Materials and methods: This research was applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of data collection. Prioritization of research variables was performed using a fuzzy hierarchical process (AHP), and interpretive structural modeling was used to identify and develop a model for the association between variables. A pairwise comparison questionnaire was used to prioritize the factors. The statistical population was safety experts. In this study, a purposive sampling method with a sample size of 25 people was used.
Results: According to the results of data analysis, a total of 4 levels (first level: personality traits of conscientiousness; second level: safety climate; third level: safety knowledge, management, attitude, and motivation; fourth level: safety participation, training, and observance) were identified as effective factors in improving safety performance. Based on the results obtained in this study, except for safety participation as one of the dependent variables, all other factors were autonomous variables. These factors had poor conductivity and dependency.
Conclusion: It is concluded that by recognizing the factors affecting the improvement of employee safety performance at different levels of the structural model and considering their impact at each level, it is possible to provide programs to reinforce these factors for improving employee safety performance.

Full-Text [PDF 458 kb]   (116 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (54 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Occupational Health
Received: 2020/12/22 | Accepted: 2021/01/30 | ePublished: 2021/06/21

1. Rohollahi AA. Investigation of relationships between different dimensions of safety climate with safety performance among aeronautical industries. Iran Occupational Health 2015; 12(3):96-107. [Article]
2. Vosoughi S, Chalak MH, Rostamzadeh S, Jahanpanah M, Ebrahimi H. Analyzing the causes of falling from height accidents in construction projects with analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Health and Safety at Work 2020; 10(2):96-109. [Article]
3. Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare, General Directorate of Labor Inspection. Statistics of accidents. Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare; 2020. Available from: https://bazresikar.mcls.gov.ir/fa/workaccident/statistics/bazresikar
4. Statistics and Strategic Information Center. Statistical Yearbook of the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare. Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare, 2019. [Report]
5. Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 2006; 91(4):946-53. [DOI] [PMID]
6. Arshadi N, Ahmadi E, Etemadi A. The effect of the safety climate and conscientiousness on the safety performance with mediating role of motivation. Psychological Methods and Models 2010; 2(5):101-16. [Article]
7. Modiri M, Dashti Shiramin M, Karimi Shirazi H. Identification and Prioritization of Influencing Factors on Safety Performance with hybrid Fuzzy Dematel and Analytical Network Process Approach (DANP) (Case Study: A Combined Cycle Power Plant). Journal of Health and Safety at Work 2019; 9(1):49-60. [Article]
8. Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 2000; 5(3):347-58. [Article] [DOI]
9. Rajabi F, Mokarrami H, Jahangiri M. Investigation of Safety Performance of the Workers and the Effective Demographic Charactristics in a Gas Refinery. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering 2019; 6(1):62-52. [Article]
10. Khakpour A, Samiei Zafarghandi A. Model for safety performance evaluation based on organizational factors affecting safety industrial using Fuzzy Inference System. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention 2015; 3(1):25-34. [DOI]
11. Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol 2009; 94(5):1103-27. [DOI] [PMID]
12. Mavaji M, Borgheipour H, Monazami Tehrani G. Vlidation and development of the questionnaire for assessment of safety climate and safety performance according to safety knowledge and safety motivation in cement industry. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention 2018; 6(1):3-12. [DOI]
13. Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 1980; 65(1):96-102. [DOI] [PMID]
14. Neal A, Griffin MA. Safety Climate and Safety Behaviour. Australian Journal of Management 2002; 27(1):67-75. [DOI]
15. Abdullah NACB. Occupational Health and Safety Management Perceptions in Malaysian Public Hospitals: Implications for the Implementation of Standardized Management Systems. [PhD thesis]. Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia: Curtin University of Technology; 2010. [Thesis]
16. Hofmann DA, Jacobs R, Landy F. High reliability process industries: individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance. J Safety Res 1995; 26(3):131-49. [DOI]
17. Mortazavi SB, Asilian H, Ostakhan M. The relationship between safety climate factors and workers behavior working in potentially dangerous Situations in height among construction workers. Iran Occupational Health 2011; 8(1):51-60. [Article]
18. Jahangiri M, Sarban Zadeh K, Bashar O, Saleh Zadeh H. Investigation risk perception, safety attitude and safety performance in supervisors of construction sites Shiraz-Iran. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2013; 1(2):10-8. [Article]
19. Postlethwaite B, Robbins S, Rickerson J, McKinniss T. The moderation of conscientiousness by cognitive ability when predicting workplace safety behavior. Pers Individ Dif 2009; 47(7):711-6. [DOI]
20. Clarke S. Robertson IT. A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. J Occupa Organ Psychol 2005; 78(3):355-76. [DOI]
21. Yekta Klosforoshi Z, Ehtesham Rasi R. Identify effective factors on job safety performance in small and medium industries of Qazvin Province (case study textile). Iranian Journal of Public Administration Mission 2015; 6(6):47-77. [Article]
22. Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accid. Anal Prev 2010; 42(6):2082-93. [DOI] [PMID]
23. Warfield JN. Developing Interconnected Matrices in Structural Modelling. IEEE Transcript on Systems, Men and Cybernetics 1974; 4(1):81-7. [DOI]
24. Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. Predicting Safety Performance: A Meta-analysis of Safety and Organizational Constructs. Paper presented at: The 22nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology; 2007 Apr; New York, United States. [Article] [DOI]
25. Bahari SF. An Investigation of Safety Training, Safety Climate and Safety Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study in a Malaysian Manufacturing Plant. [PhD thesis]. Manchester, England, United Kingdom: University of Manchester; 2011. [Thesis]
26. Adl J, Jahangiri M, Rismanchian M, Mary Oriad H, Karimi A, Ghaderi MR. Safety climate in a steel-manufacturing plant. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research 2011; 9(1):23-34. [Article]
27. Ghasemi F, Mirzaei M, Mehdinia M, Darvishi E, Shahidi R. The Role of Personal Commitment to Safety in Shaping Safety Performance of Front-Line Employees; A Case Study in Small Manufacturing Industries. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2018; 6(2):16-23. [DOI]
28. Ghasemi F, Mohammadfam I, Tapak, L, Asadi M. Improvement of Safety Performance of Nurses Using a Participatory Ergonomic Approach: A Case Study in a Hospitals Affiliated to the Iranian Oil Industry. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering 2019; 6(2):19-26. [Article] [DOI]
29. Kiyantaj R, Ramezani A, Amrolahi N. Knowledge Management as an Agent of Enhancing the Safety Culture in Organizations. Iran Occupational Health 2019; 16(5):1-13. [Article]
30. Zaravoshani V, Sheikhi S, Amini M, Mohammadi Zidi I. Investigation of safety attitude among operating room staff of working in educational hospitals of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Paper presented at: The 2nd Conference of the Safe Society of Tehran; 2009 Oct 7; Tehran, Iran.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb