Volume 14, Issue 4 (Autumn 2025)                   J Occup Health Epidemiol 2025, 14(4): 295-302 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Habibi E, Saber E, Barakat S. Enhancing Resilience Engineering through Reliability Optimization: An Approach to Systems Protection and Upgrade (Narrative Review). J Occup Health Epidemiol 2025; 14 (4) :295-302
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-952-en.html

Related article in
Google Scholar

1- Professor, Dept. of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Ph.D. Student in Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Student Research Committee AND Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. , elhamsaber770@gmail.com
3- Ph.D. Student in Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Student Research Committee AND Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Article history
Received: 2024/10/31
Accepted: 2025/05/22
ePublished: 2025/12/13
Abstract:   (28 Views)
Background: The concepts of resilience to accidents and disasters, as well as increasing reliability, have become increasingly important due to the uncertainties surrounding events and risks that organizations face. Achieving a balance between reliability and resilience is one of the most important goals for successful organizations and serves as a critical element in ensuring the safety of employees and equipment.
Materials and Methods: In this research, we used several databases, including ISI Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE (via PubMed), ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The keywords searched for the article were “resilience,” “reliability,” and “incidents and events.”
Results: Resilience engineering (RE) in organizations plays a critical role in enabling safe employee performance. Furthermore, by promoting a favorable approach that increases productivity, availability is also increased, the risk of incidents is reduced, and, consequently, reliability in the organization increases as positive outcomes become widespread.
Conclusion: This review provides valuable information on the increasing availability, evolution, and the barriers and challenges affecting resilience and reliability, and offers high-level insights for future research.
Full-Text [PDF 566 kb]   (16 Downloads)    

References
1. Clark-Ginsberg A, Slayton R. Regulating risks within complex sociotechnical systems: Evidence from critical infrastructure cybersecurity standards. Sci Public Policy. 2019;46(3):339-46. [DOI]
2. Seifi H, Sepasian MS. Electric power system planning: issues, algorithms and solutions. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2011. [DOI]
3. Colepicolo E. Information reliability for academic research: review and recommendations. New Libr World. 2015;116(11-12):646-60. [DOI]
4. Panteli M, Trakas DN, Mancarella P, Hatziargyriou ND. Power systems resilience assessment: Hardening and smart operational enhancement strategies. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2017;105(7):1202-13. [DOI]
5. Kemabonta T, Mowry G. A syncretistic approach to grid reliability and resilience: Investigations from Minnesota. Energy Strategy Rev. 2021;38:100726. [DOI]
6. Francis R, Bekera B. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2014;121:90-103. [DOI]
7. Berger E, Jamshidi N, Reupert A, Jobson L, Miko A. Review: The mental health implications for children and adolescents impacted by infectious outbreaks–a systematic review. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2021;26(2):157-66. [DOI] [PMID]
8. Clark-Ginsberg A. What’s the Difference between Reliability and Resilience?. Washington, D.C., United States: Department of Homeland Security. 2016.
9. Kitamura H, Shindo M, Tachibana A, Honma H, Someya T. Personality and resilience associated with perceived fatigue of local government employees responding to disasters. J Occup Health. 2013;55(1):1-5. [DOI] [PMID]
10. Vugrin ED, Warren DE, Ehlen MA. A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane. Process Saf Prog. 2011;30(3):280-90. [DOI]
11. Wu X, Li X, Lu Y, Hout M. Two tales of one city: Unequal vulnerability and resilience to COVID-19 by socioeconomic status in Wuhan, China. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2021;72:100584. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Braun TJ, Hayes BC, DeMuth RLF, Taran OA. The development, validation, and practical application of an employee agility and resilience measure to facilitate organizational change. Ind Organ Psychol. 2017;10(4):703-23. [DOI]
13. Niazi IUHK, Rana IA, Arshad HSH, Lodhi RH, Najam FA, Jamshed A. Psychological resilience of children in a multi-hazard environment: An index-based approach. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022;83:103397. [DOI]
14. Masten AS, Cicchetti D. 6 Resilience in development: Progress and transformation. (Risk, Resilience, and Intervention; Vol 4). In: Developmental Psychopathology. 3re ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016. P.271-333.
15. Lazarus RS. From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annu Rev Psychol. 1993;44:1-21. [DOI] [PMID]
16. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 2000;71(3):543-62. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Hjemdal O, Friborg O, Stiles TC, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge JH. A new scale for adolescent resilience: Grasping the central protective resources behind healthy development. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2006;39(2):84-96. [DOI]
18. Wu YL, Zhao X, Ding XX, Yang HY, Qian ZZ, Feng F, et al. A prospective study of psychological resilience and depression among left-behind children in China. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(5):627-36. [DOI] [PMID]
19. Zamanian H, Amini-Tehrani M, Jalali Z, Daryaafzoon M, Ala S, Tabrizian S, et al. Perceived social support, coping strategies, anxiety and depression among women with breast cancer: Evaluation of a mediation model. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021;50:101892. [DOI] [PMID]
20. Hao R, Dong H, Zhang R, Li P, Zhang P, Zhang M, et al. The relationship between neuroticism fit and general well-being: The mediating effect of psychological resilience. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2219. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Börjesson M, Österberg J, Enander A. Risk and safety attitudes among conscripts during compulsory military training. Mil Psychol. 2011;23(6):659-84. [DOI]
22. Rathnayaka B, Siriwardana C, Robert D, Amaratunga D, Setunge S. Improving the resilience of critical infrastructures: Evidence-based insights from a systematic literature review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022;78:103123. [DOI]
23. Song J, Kang WH, Lee YJ, Chun J. Structural system reliability: Overview of theories and applications to optimization. ASCE A SME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A Civ Eng. 2021;7(2):0001122. [DOI]
24. Didier M, Broccardo M, Esposito S, Stojadinovic B. A compositional demand/supply framework to quantify the resilience of civil infrastructure systems (Re-CoDeS). Sustain Resilient Infrastruct. 2018;3(2):86-102. [DOI]
25. Yi Sr, Kim T. System‐reliability‐based disaster resilience analysis for structures considering aleatory uncertainties in external loads. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2023;52(15):4939-63. [DOI]
26. Gao J, Li Y, Wu X. Revision and validation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale of coal miners in China. Int J Ind Ergon. 2021;85:103191. [DOI]
27. Penaloza GA, Saurin TA, Formoso CT, Herrera IA. A resilience engineering perspective of safety performance measurement systems: A systematic literature review. Saf Sci. 2020;130:104864. [DOI]
28. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer Jr BF, Dyke SJ. Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. J Eng Mech. 2004;130(4):366. [DOI]
29. American Society of Civil Engineers. Prestandard for Performance-Based Wind Design V1.1. Virginia, United States: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2023.
30. Ghosh S, Ghosh S, Chakraborty S. Seismic fragility analysis in the probabilistic performance-based earthquake engineering framework: an overview. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math. 2021;13:122-35. [DOI]
31. Executive Office of the President. Economic benefits of increasing electric grid resilience to weather outages. Washington, United States: Executive Office of the President., 2013.
32. Gritzalis D, Theocharidou M, Stergiopoulos G. Critical infrastructure security and resilience: Theories, Methods, Tools and Technologies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019. [DOI]
33. Ahern J. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan. 2011;100(4):341-3. [DOI]
34. Warren CA. 1366-2012-IEEE guide for electric power distribution reliability indices. Piscataway, NJ, United States: IEEE Standards Association; 2012.
35. Hollnagel E. The four cornerstones of resilience engineering. In: Resilience Engineering Perspectives (Vol 2). Boca Raton, Florida, United States: CRC Press; 2016. P.139-56.
36. Woods DD. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliab Eng Sys Saf. 2015;141:5-9. [DOI]
37. Dekker SW, Woods DD. Chapter 5- The high reliability organization perspective. In: Human factors in aviation. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Academic Press; 2010. P.123-43. [DOI]
38. Woods DD, Branlat M. Basic patterns in how adaptive systems fail. In: Resilience engineering in practice. 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2017. P.127-43. [DOI]
39. Dombrowski P, Demchak C. Thinking systemically about security and resilience in an era of cybered conflict. In: Cybersecurity Policies and Strategies for Cyberwarfare Prevention. Pennsylvania, United States: IGI Global; 2015. P. 367-82.
40. Clark‐Ginsberg A, DeSmet D, Rueda IA, Hagen R, Hayduk B. Disaster risk creation and cascading disasters within large technological systems: COVID‐19 and the 2021 Texas blackouts. J Conting Crisis Manag. 2021;29(4):445-9. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
41. de Bruijne ML. Networked reliability. Institutional fragmentation and the reliability of service provision in critical infrastructures. [P.hD. Thesis]. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology; 2006. [DOI]
42. Prasanna P, Nagy P. Learning from high-reliability organizations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(10):725-6. [DOI] [PMID]
43. Klein RL, Bigley GA, Roberts KH. Organizational culture in high reliability organizations: An extension. Hum Relat. 1995;48(7):771-93. [DOI]
44. Cantu J, Tolk J, Fritts S, Gharehyakheh A. Interventions and measurements of highly reliable/resilient organization implementations: a literature review. Appl Ergon. 2021;90:103241. [DOI] [PMID]
45. Haslam SA, Jetten J, Maskor M, McMillan B, Bentley SV, Steffens NK, et al. Developing high-reliability organisations: A social identity model. Saf Sci. 2022;153:105814. [DOI]
46. Disconzi CMDG, Saurin TA. Design for resilient performance: Concept and principles. Appl Ergon. 2022;101:103707. [DOI] [PMID]
47. Bartuseviciene I, Butkus M, Schiuma G. Modelling organizational resilience structure: insights to assess resilience integrating bounce-back and bounce-forward. Eur J Innov Manag. 2024;27(1):153-69. [DOI]
48. Padgett J, Gossett K, Mayer R, Chien WW, Turner F. Improving patient safety through high reliability organizations. Qual Rep. 2017;22(2):410-25. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2025 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb