Volume 10, Issue 2 (Spring 2021)                   J Occup Health Epidemiol 2021, 10(2): 67-74 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rashidi R. Anthropometric Dimensions of Lor Students for the Ergonomic Design of Khorramabad School Equipment, Iran (2018). J Occup Health Epidemiol 2021; 10 (2) :67-74
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-432-en.html

Related article in
Google Scholar

Associate Prof, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Health and Nutrition Research Center, School of Health, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran. , Rashidi.r270@gmail.com
Article history
Received: 2020/11/15
Accepted: 2021/03/11
ePublished: 2021/06/27
Subject: Epidemiology
Full-Text [PDF 473 kb]   (1045 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2239 Views)
Full-Text:   (648 Views)
 

Introduction

Students' physical health, performance, and comfort can be improved by designing equipment according to the needs of the human body dimensions. Nowadays, backache has gained public attention as an important health problem among school children [1, 2, 3, 4]. In the US, about $25 million is spent on treating students' nonspecific backaches caused by the non-appropriation of bodily dimensions to the chairs and desks used in classrooms. The use of poorly designed furniture, especially desks and tables, that fails to account for the users' anthropometric characteristics has a negative influence on human health. Students' sitting posture is influenced not only by the activities performed in the classroom but also by their anthropometric measures and school furniture designs. Therefore, one of the most important concerns of ergonomists is to design and produce instruments that match people's bodily dimensions in order to decrease the adverse effects, thus increasing work output and efficiency [5, 6, 7, 8].

According to official statistics, the student population in Iran amounts to 20 million, while it is estimated to be one billion globally. However, it seems that no serious and persistent attention has been paid to classrooms, whether nationally or globally, thus neglecting students' health. Various studies have shown that individuals' postures during childhood and adolescence deeply affect the way they sit and stand for a lifetime. Indeed, the longer these early postures are maintained, they are more difficult to be corrected later on [9, 10, 11]. Students spend a great deal of their time in classrooms in sitting positions. Static postures and sitting in a crookbacked manner for long periods can put great physical strains on muscles, tendons, and vertebrae in particular.

Anthropometric measures vary among nations and ethnic groups and change over time depending on variations in populations and environmental conditions [3, 6]. Hence, it has been recommended to use students' anthropometric data to design school supplies and equipment. In order to design the equipment for students (e.g., chairs and desks) according to technical and health principles, it is necessary to aid the designers by providing accurate data about the anthropometric dimensions of the students residing in different geographical regions [6, 7]. One of the most comprehensive anthropometric studies was conducted on students aging 11-13 years in the US in 1975, in which 87 bodily features and dimensions were measured, except for the popliteal height and the buttock-popliteal fossa length [12, 13]. In other countries in Europe and America, the necessary relevant standards have been prepared. Among the international standards approved by the World Health Organization (WHO), those provided by the US National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) can be pointed out. This center has specified the standards of bodily dimensions for different age groups, which can be used in designing equipment [14, 15, 16]. In Iran, a survey was designed in1977 to compare the height and weight of 3270 students aging 6-14 years in urban and rural areas of Shiraz. Another anthropometric study was carried out in Mazandaran province to measure 17 bodily parameters of 1758 students aged 6-11 years; further, the means and percentiles of the anthropometric dimensions of male and female students were compared. This research objective was to provide the necessary data for designing students' chairs and desks [17, 18]. In another anthropometric survey on children less than 10 years old in Qazvin city, the height and weight of boys and girls were less than the global averages reported by WHO [19]. In another study performed on students in Kashan, emphasis was put on reliance on the necessary standards obtained from domestic anthropometric data rather than foreign standards [20].

At present, few countries have domestic anthropometric databases; thus, other countries have to use their data in case of need, which is scientifically unacceptable. The current study aims to develop a comprehensive database of the anthropometric dimensions of students from the Lor ethnic group residing in Khorramabad. Comparison of the anthropometric measures of different student populations could help design chairs, desks, and other school supplies.

 

Materials and Methods

This is a descriptive study conducted on Lor students in Khorramabad in primary, middle, and high schools in the public or non-profit sectors in 2018.

Given the standard variance and the coefficient of variation in similar populations, the appropriate sample size for each class, education level, and sex was determined. In the following formula, the values of z, δ, and d were equal to 1.96, 150, and 6, respectively. As a result, the sample size was estimated at 2401 people based on the variable of students' height with a standard deviation of 150 according to the formula below [21].

 

=2401

Given the design effect, the estimated sample size was multiplied by two (n=4802). Yet, the total sample size was increased to 4872 students with equal numbers of male and female students. Inclusion criteria included all Lor students of different educational levels living in Khorramabad, and exclusion criteria included non-Lor students and those with physical development disorders. Cluster sampling was used in the study; accordingly, each of the three training areas of Khorramabad city was considered as a cluster, and all schools in each cluster were included in the study. Samples were selected randomly from male and female students by a proportional allocation.

The following anthropometric parameters were recorded: age (years), weight (kg), stature, standing eye height, shoulder height, standing elbow height, chest depth, abdominal depth, arm length, forearm length, maximum forearm-forearm breadth, elbow-elbow breadth, shoulder breadth, hip breadth, thigh thickness, the thickness of both thighs measured together, sitting height, sitting eye height, sitting elbow height, popliteal height, knee height, buttock-popliteal length, and buttock-knee length. The anthropometric dimensions were measured (in millimeters) by male and female assistants using a digital caliper and a standardized anthropometric instrument designed by Lahmi et al. [21]. Additionally, the students were weighed by Samsung digital scales with an accuracy of ±5 grams. The accuracy and reliability of the utilized devices were assessed prior to the measurements. It should be noted that all students were wearing light clothes and were barefoot during the measurements. Besides, the data recorded for each student was the mean of three trials.

Ethics approval was obtained from the officials of Khorramabad University of Medical Sciences and Education. After entering the data into the computer, a t-test was used to compare the variables by gender at a significant level (P <0.005). Given that percentiles express the real concept of dimensional scattering within the design range, in order to use the data in the design of different percentile equipment, anthropometric dimensions of students were determined. Finally, the results were expressed in a table as averages and standard deviations.

 

Results

This cross-sectional study was performed on 4872 male and female students to determine the anthropometric measurements of Lor students in Khorramabad. The average weight and height of male students were 43.05 kg with a maximum of 114kg and minimum 15 kg and 1499.43 mm height with a maximum 1900 and minimum 1020 mm. The average weight and height of female students were 41.75 kg with a maximum of 97 and a minimum of 14 kg and 1458 mm height with a maximum of 1760 and a minimum of 1020 mm, respectively. Standard deviation and statistical percentages were calculated as 5% to 99%.

Table 1 provides the comparison of the mean of anthropometric variables in male and female students. As can be seen, there is a significant difference between the mean of all measured parameters except the variable of buttock-popliteal length in male and female students.

The results also show that the average anthropometric dimensions of the chest depth and abdominal depth in female students are larger than boys; these dimensions in girls were 176.89 and 172.19 mm compared to boys with 170.93 and 158.99 mm, respectively.


Table 1. Mean ± SD, min, and max of the anthropometric dimensions in the two genders (in millimeters)

Statistical index

variables

Male students

Female students

T-test results

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Weight (kg)

43.05

16.69

15

114

41.75

14.81

14

97

0.004

Stature

1499.43

189.86

1020

1900

1458

154.29

1020

1760

0.001

Standing eye height

1384.72

192.62

880

1790

1337.19

156.22

760

1650

0.001

Shoulder height

1233.13

175.85

640

1600

1197.08

142.58

640

1480

0.001

Standing elbow height

933.70

132.21

590

1220

883.93

106.32

600

1180

0.001

Chest depth

170.93

28.19

90

290

176.89

31.94

80

318

0.001

Abdominal depth

158.99

30.17

80

370

172.19

33.49

60

398

0.001

Arm length

304.92

45.69

130

490

298.33

40.80

116

458

0.001

Forearm length

395.01

58.67

230

530

378.65

50.35

148

557

0.001

Maximum forearm-forearm breadth

359.07

50.49

200

570

315.06

41

116

540

0.001

Elbow-elbow breadth

347.15

50.78

220

540

343.90

46.32

188

550

0.001

Shoulder breadth

340.02

51.98

190

540

330.16

44.34

110

580

0.001

Hip breadth

284.09

47.57

100

450

276.11

44.09

140

467

0.001

Thigh thickness

107.13

26.56

37

310

75.01

21.75

22

203

0.001

The thickness of both thighs measured together

194.57

40.21

97

360

185.05

40.14

94

396

0.001

Sitting height

786.95

95.79

480

1000

753.93

82.66

440

920

0.001

Sitting eye height

674.99

95.60

390

890

633.37

78.70

340

860

0.001

Sitting elbow height

209.50

35.32

80

460

177.51

30.90

90

320

0.001

Popliteal height

384.33

53.04

230

530

353.78

31.77

210

580

0.001

Knee height

462.05

64.54

240

620

428.12

47.03

245

598

0.001

Buttock-popliteal length

380.90

59.61

190

570

382.89

58.55

220

576

0.2

Buttock-knee length

478.74

72.60

280

650

487.67

68.22

252

670

0.001

 

Table 2 presents the different percentiles of anthropometric dimensions of male and female students. Percentiles are very important statistical indicators in developing tools and equipment and are widely used in design engineering. As can be seen, in the 95th percentile, as one of the most important percentiles in equipment design, all dimensions, except chest depth and abdominal depth, in male students have larger values than females.


Table 2. Percentile values of different anthropometric dimensions of students in the two genders (in millimeters)

Percentiles

 

variables

Male students

Female students

1st

5th

10th

50th

95th

99th

1st

5th

10th

50th

95th

99th

Weight (kg)

17

20

22

41

72

85

17.68

20

23

42

66

77.32

Height

1130

1190

1230

1490

1770

1836

1110

1180

1220

1500

1660

1700

Standing eye height

1000

1070

1120

1370

1660

1720

980

1050

1100

1380

1540

1580

Standing shoulder height

890

940

990

1230

1480

1540

880

940

980

1240

1380

1420

Standing elbow height

660

710

750

940

1120

1170

640

690

720

910

1020

1070

Chest depth

120

130

140

170

220

240

114.68

130

139

175

230

257

Abdominal depth

110

120

130

150

220

250

105.68

124

133

170

230

270.32

Arm length

210

230

240

300

370

390

200

230

243

305

354

380

Forearm length

280

300

310

400

480

500

260

293

310

390

447

32.466

Maximum forearm-forearm breadth

244.4

280

300

360

440

480

228.67

250.40

264

314

380

420

Elbow-elbow breadth

250

270

280

340

430

490

250

272

386

340

424

468

Shoulder breadth

240

260

270

340

420

450

236

256

270

337

396

420

Hip breadth

190

210

220

280

360

390

187.68

205

217

279

350

380

Thigh thickness

55

70

80

100

150

180

35

43

48

74

110

136.33

The thickness of both thighs measured together

120

140

150

190

270

310

114

130

140

180

260

305.96

Sitting height

570

630

660

790

940

970

550

610

630

770

860

890

Sitting eye height

460

510

550

670

820

850

450

490

520

650

740

770

Sitting elbow height

120

150

170

210

270

290

100

130

140

180

230

250

Popliteal height

270

300

310

390

460

480

280

310

320

350

410

440

Knee height

323.2

350

370

470

550

570

316

345

360

438

60.496

520

Buttock-popliteal length

250

280

300

380

470

500

259.68

283

300

390

469

500

Buttock-knee length

320

350

380

480

580

600

335.68

364

386

507

580

602.32

 

 Table 3 shows the anthropometric dimensions of male and female students at different levels of education. As can be seen, the average growth of anthropometric dimensions in girls often occurs in middle school, while it occurs in high school in males. Further, the average weight and height in middle school girls are 45.93 kg and 1531.87 mm, respectively, while in boys, the values are 44.06 kg and 1528.16 mm, respectively, which are lower than the anthropometric measurements of girls


Table 3. Anthropometric estimation of body dimensions among male and female students in different education levels

Statistical index

variable

Primary school

Junior high school

High school

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Weight (kg)

Male

29.76

9.53

15

71

44.06

12.54

22

92

58.88

11.59

30

114

Female

29.08

8.94

14

73

45.93

11.13

23

94

54.52

9.49

36

97

Height

Male

1321.73

107.99

1020

1660

1528.16

101.79

1270

1810

1699.31

75.42

1380

1900

Female

1308.09

109.33

1020

1660

1531.87

72.84

1310

1720

1590.26

54.78

1310

1760

Standing eye height

Male

1204.35

108.81

880

1540

1413.85

102.05

1150

1700

1587.66

78.41

1150

1790

Female

1186.20

113.48

760

1550

1411.92

71.38

1200

1610

1470.17

55.85

1130

1650

Standing shoulder height

Male

1069.51

104.87

640

1400

1261.64

93.91

1030

1520

1415.82

70.22

1020

1600

Female

1060.67

105.69

640

1390

1264.40

65.95

1030

1420

1318.9

51.33

1150

1480

Standing elbow height

Male

811.42

83.12

590

1100

956.18

70.36

790

1160

1069.26

51.22

890

1220

Female

785.80

82.66

600

1070

929.53

52.84

720

1070

972.65

43.62

820

1180

Chest depth

Male

152.22

20.98

90

230

171.84

23.53

120

290

193.57

21.70

140

270

Female

154.47

22.31

80

250

189.50

28.60

105

312

195.45

27.11

108

318

Abdominal depth

Male

147.98

26.36

80

260

159.44

31.24

110

300

172.46

28.45

110

370

Female

154.71

27.83

60

297

186.04

34.03

102

355

183.54

29.51

100

398

Arm length

Male

266.53

32.11

140

380

309.38

28.34

130

400

349.42

23.10

280

490

Female

265.50

32.16

130

380

317.05

26.72

119

458

325.31

28.96

116

430

Forearm length

Male

342.72

36.47

230

450

401.10

34.46

270

510

455.63

25.51

320

530

Female

334.01

38.19

148

452

406.73

31.84

151

557

413.30

27.29

289

486

Maximum forearm-forearm breadth

Male

328.99

42.85

200

470

356.89

37.47

260

480

398.25

40.43

290

570

Female

288.42

32.30

207

420

337.54

39.74

116

501

331.29

31.86

158

540

Elbow-elbow breadth

Male

324.73

46

220

500

342.66

47.05

230

540

378.53

42.65

270

540

Female

315.25

39.68

188

462

361.98

42.97

262

511

366.12

36.31

260

550

Shoulder breadth

Male

300.61

36.06

190

450

336.93

33.82

240

440

391.46

32.05

240

540

Female

295.10

35.37

110

420

348.46

35.11

139

580

360.31

26.79

247

478

Hip breadth

Male

249.32

36.77

100

400

287.34

35.91

200

410

325.02

30.73

120

450

Female

242.21

33.52

140

390

294.40

35.71

199

467

304.80

31.10

174

430

Thigh thickness

Male

91.97

20.87

37

170

107.20

23.19

50

190

125.99

22.99

80

310

Female

65.42

20.74

22

170

85.60

21.66

30

203

78.93

17.67

36

141

The thickness of both thighs measured together

Male

170.65

30.66

97

290

195.95

36.51

110

350

223.42

33.77

140

360

Female

167.67

35.49

94

358

197.19

41.48

100

396

197.61

36.32

113

384

Sitting height

Male

702.79

72.59

480

910

798.43

52.13

580

970

883.19

48.62

720

1000

Female

680.67

64.20

440

890

785.22

52.51

580

900

822.31

34.70

670

920

Sitting eye height

Male

590.60

60.37

390

800

683.87

52.50

450

860

773.38

46.22

610

890

Female

563.85

61.52

340

750

666.76

45.23

510

780

659.39

40.46

340

860

Sitting elbow height

Male

185.05

29.92

80

250

211.25

19.78

140

270

238.69

26.99

160

460

Female

162.14

28.09

90

250

180.32

24.84

120

260

194.76

28.73

110

320

Popliteal height

Male

337.11

35.95

250

480

396.56

31.56

230

530

433.98

26.63

330

530

Female

334.68

29.82

210

580

363.84

30.92

320

460

370.15

19.89

310

470

Knee height

Male

402.59

43.14

240

530

478.11

35.28

360

580

524.13

27.71

410

620

Female

390.97

41.90

280

540

452.97

31.83

317

598

455.82

27.01

245

556

Buttock-popliteal height

Male

331.73

45.74

190

530

389.54

34.19

280

510

435.65

32.96

340

570

Female

331.22

42.49

220

507

411.75

37.85

285

576

425.83

34.10

300

559

Buttock-knee height

Male

413.36

49.18

280

570

491.95

39.24

350

610

550.31

32.17

420

650

Female

426.16

74.52

260

593

524.23

40.92

252

670

537.10

32.71

305

645

 

Table 4 provides the different percentiles of anthropometric dimensions for students in both middle and high school. Due to the difference in the anthropometric dimensions of male and female students (Table 3), which often occurs in middle and high school, it is important for design engineers to know the percentiles of these two degrees.

 

Table 4. Percentile values of anthropometric dimensions among students in different education levels

Percentiles

 

Variables

Elementary school

Junior high school

High school

5th

10th

50th

90th

99th

5th

10th

50th

90th

99th

5th

10th

50th

90th

99th

Weight (kg)

Male

18

20

28

43

60

29

30

42

62

83.89

42

45

57.5

73

93.83

Female

19

20

27

41

59.73

30

33

44

60

85.69

41

43

54

67

81.88

Height

Male

1150

1180

1320

1460

1570

1380

1401

1520

1670

1780

1560

1600

1710

1780

1858.30

Female

1130

1170

1300

1460

1580

1400

1430

1540

1620

1690

1510

1520

1590

1660

1710

Standing eye height

Male

1030

1060

1200

1340

1450

1265.5

1290

1410

1559

1660

1448.50

1490

1595

1680

1750

Female

1000

1040

1180

1340

1450

1290

1320

1420

1500

1570

1390

1400

1470

1540

1600

Standing shoulder height

Male

900

930

1070

1200

1298.4

1120

1140

1250

1390

1488.90

1290

1330

1420

1490

1578.30

Female

900

930

1060

1200

1310

1150

1180

1270

1340

1400

1240

1260

1320

1380

1440

Standing elbow height

Male

680

700

810

910

1010

850

870

950

1050

1120

980

1010

1070

1130

1190

Female

660

680

780

900

980

840

860

930

1000

1050

910

920

970

1030

1088.80

Chest depth

Male

120

130

150

180

220

140

150

170

200

248.90

160

170

190

220

250

Female

120

129

150

185

210.73

150

156

187

224.9

274.69

152.60

165

193

232

261.76

Abdominal depth

Male

120

120

140

180

248.4

120

130

150

200

278.90

140

150

170

200

260

Female

116

123

150

190

239.73

141

150

190

230

306.90

140

150

180

219

267.76

Arm length

Male

220

230

260

300

358.4

270

280

310

350

388.90

310

320

350

370

418.30

Female

218.35

228

263

307

358.38

278

284

319

347

384.38

285

298

326

355

407.76

Forearm length

Male

290

300

340

390

428.4

350

360

400

450

480

420

430

460

480

510

Female

273.70

290

334

385

420

352.55

370

410

440

472.69

367

380

415

446

472.88

Maximum forearm-forearm breadth

Male

260

270

330

380

440

300

310

350

410

450

340

350

400

450

500

Female

240

250

286

330

373.2

283

292

332

390

456.90

280

292

330

370

406.76

Elbow-elbow breadth

Male

260

270

320

380

468.4

280

290

340

410

490

320

330

370

430

500

Female

260

270

310

370

430

299.55

313

356.50

420.90

489.69

316

325

364

410

469.52

Shoulder breadth

Male

250

260

300

350

400

280

290

330

380

420

340

350

390

430

480

Female

245

254

290

342.3

399.2

298

309

345.50

390

437.14

315

330

360

390

418

Hip breadth

Male

200

210

240

300

350

240

250

280

330

388.90

280

290

325

360

408.30

Female

195

201.4

240

284.3

340.92

244

250

290

340

393.45

250

269

303

349

389.28

Thigh thickness

Male

60

70

90

120

150

80

80

100

140

178.90

100

100

120

150

200

Female

38

43

60

96

120

55

60

84

110

151.38

50

57

78

100

130

The thickness of both thighs measured together

Male

 

130

140

164

210

270

140

160

190

240

308.90

180

187

220

270

328.30

Female

120

130

160

212

283.2

144.55

152

190

259.90

310.69

144.60

156

192

245

314.40

Sitting height

Male

600

620

700

780

850

720

730

800

860

940

800

820

890

950

980

Female

580

600

680

760

847

690

720

790

850

880

770

780

820

870

900

Sitting eye height

Male

490

510

590

670

738

610

620

680

750

828.90

690

717

780

830

870

Female

460

490

560

650

710

580

610

670

720

770

630

650

700

740

800

Sitting elbow height

Male

130

150

190

220

248

180

190

210

240

260

200

200

240

270

300

Female

110

120

160

200

237

140

150

180

220

240

150

160

190

230

260

Popliteal height

Male

280

300

340

380

440

350

360

400

440

480

390

400

430

470

500

Female

300

310

330

370

430

340

340

350

410

450

350

350

360

400

438.80

Knee height

Male

340

350

400

460

518

420

430

480

520

560

480

490

520

560

590

Female

330

340

385

450

507

404

415

450

490

543

415

425

456

490

519.52

Buttock-popliteal length

Male

260

270

330

390

450

330

350

390

440

470

380

390

435

480

518.30

Female

270

280

330

387

457.7

350

367

410.5

457.90

506.83

370

383

428

468.80

504.88

Buttock-knee length

Male

340

350

410

480

540

430

440

490

540

580

498.50

510

550

590

628.30

Female

350

360

420

500

555.8

459

479

528.8

571.80

616.83

485

500

537

577.80

613



Discussion

In a community-based descriptive study, 4872 male and female students of Lor ethnicity in Khorramabad who met the necessary criteria for inclusion were studied to determine 22 anthropometric dimensions used in designing equipment needed by students in schools. In order to use this anthropometric data in designing school equipment, in addition to the mean and standard deviation of each anthropometric dimension of students, the maximum and minimum dimensions were determined. Also, different statistical percentiles, including 5, 50, 95, and 99 percentiles widely applied by design engineers in designing tools and equipment used by students, were calculated for different anthropometric dimensions. Comparison of the measured anthropometric dimensions among elementary school students indicated that the anthropometric dimensions of male students were greater than those of females, except for chest depth, abdominal depth, and buttock-knee length. For instance, the means of standing height and sitting height were 1321.73 and 702.79 mm, respectively, among the male students. These measures were respectively obtained as 1308.09 and 680.67 mm among female students. Additionally, the minimum and maximum height were 1020 and 1660 mm, respectively, for male and female students. The results showed no significant differences between male and female students with regard to the estimated percentiles of anthropometric dimensions. In other words, the obtained sizes were quite close in almost all calculated percentiles. Moreover, the anthropometric dimensions of the elementary school students in Lorestan province were compared to the data obtained in similar studies in Ilam and Mazandaran provinces. The results showed that the bodily dimensions of male and female students residing in Khorramabad were greater than those of the students residing in Ilam and Mazandaran. Therefore, it can be concluded that anthropometric dimensions in different Iranian ethnicities are different. Nonetheless, the anthropometric estimations obtained in this study are almost equal to those published by WHO [18, 19, 20].

The findings of this study regarding the anthropometric estimations of junior high school students in Khorramabad indicated the mean values for bodily dimensions, such as weight, height, standing shoulder height, chest depth, abdominal depth, arm length, forearm length, elbow-elbow breadth, shoulder breadth, hip breadth, the thickness of both thighs measured together, buttock-popliteal length, and buttock-knee length, to be greater among female students compared to male students. This might be attributed to the earlier pubescence among female students and must be taken into account in designing school desks and chairs [9, 10]. According to various percentiles of the anthropometric dimensions of male and female students at the junior high school level, variables such as weight, height, standing eye height, arm length, forearm length, and standing shoulder height were greater among female students compared to male students up to the 50th percentile, while the same variables were greater among male students at the 90th and 99th percentiles. Moreover, the anthropometric estimations of standing elbow height, maximum forearm-forearm breadth, sitting height, sitting eye height, sitting elbow height, popliteal height, and knee height were greater among male students compared with female ones. A remarkable point concerning the anthropometric percentiles of students at the junior high school level was that hip breadth, buttock-popliteal length, and buttock-knee length, mostly used in designing chair seats, were greater among female students in various percentiles. Further, the mean height was higher among female students compared to males at the junior high school level (1531.87 mm), unlike the elementary school level (1528.16 mm). As mentioned above, this can be explained by earlier pubescence among female students. Comparing the measured anthropometric dimensions of male and female students at the junior high school level in Khorramabad with other similar studies revealed noticeable differences. Accordingly, the mean height of Lor females at this age range was greater than that of females from Hong Kong (1508) but lower compared to English females (1555) [18].

The present study also showed all measured anthropometric parameters to be greater in male students, except for chest depth and abdominal depth. Accordingly, the mean height was 1699.31 mm (±75.42) among male students and 1590.26 (±54.78) among female ones. Further comparison at the high school level showed that, except for chest depth and abdominal depth being a little greater in size among female students, all other anthropometric dimensions were greater among male students. This difference might be due to musculoskeletal growth among male students in this age range. The anthropometric measurements obtained among high school students in the present study were different from those in similar studies performed on the same age range participants. Accordingly, the mean height of male and female high school students in Khorramabad was greater in those from Hong Kong but lower in those from the UK [18].

In one study, anthropometric indices of height, weight, seating height, seating depth, and seating width of 300 girls and boys aged 18-25 years in southern Thailand were examined by Klamklay et al. (2008). The results indicated a significant difference in the weight, structure, and body dimensions of the subjects, which should be considered for the design of school chairs [22].

Another study showed that the proportion of the furniture dimensions in the schools to the anthropometric dimensions of the students was not optimal. Therefore, it is necessary to consider anthropometric differences in designing a suitable chair for students [23].

The available studies are applicable according to their methodologies, i.e., applying their results to the general Iranian population would have some limitations. Therefore, it is necessary to be up-to-dated with the existing anthropometric tables to produce a comprehensive table for Iranian anthropometric dimensions [24].

One of the limitations of this study is its large volume of samples, thus coordinating with schools in the study community and transporting the measuring instruments and equipment.

Since the design starts and ends with humans, an appropriate comprehensive database of human anthropometric dimensions is recommended to be created for the relevant designing activities. These results may help design school furniture for Lor students. This study can be conducted in other Iranian ethnic and age groups to achieve a complete bank of anthropometric dimensions required by designers of various equipment.

 
Conclusion

This study shows that the anthropometric dimensions of female students in middle school are often larger than male students; also, in high school, boys have larger anthropometric dimensions. It is necessary to pay special attention to students' age and education level in designing school supplies, particularly desks and chairs. Also, the designs should be targeted at specific populations, given the considerable differences between male and female students' body dimensions. Since racial differences are an important factor, designers need to pay attention to anthropometric differences among various ethnic groups.

 
Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the individuals and organizations that cooperated in this study, especially Lorestan University of Medical Sciences.

 

 Conflict of interest: None declared.

 
  

 

References
1. Dhara PC, Khaspuri G, Sau SK. Complaints arising from a mismatch between school furniture and anthropometric measurements of rural secondary school children during classwork. Environ Health Prev Med 2009; 14(1):36-45. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Tunay M, Melemez K. An analysis of biomechanical and anthropometric parameters on classroom furniture design. Afr J Biotechnol 2008; 7(8):1081-6. [Article]
3. Jones GT, Watson KD, Silman AJ, Symmons DP, Macfarlane GJ. Predictors of low back pain in British schoolchildren: a population-based prospective cohort study. Pediatrics 2003; 111(4 pt 1):822-8. [DOI] [PMID]
4. Jeffries LJ, Milanese SF, Grimmer-Sommers KA. Epidemiology of adolescent spinal pain: a systematic overview of the research literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32(23):2630-7. [DOI] [PMID]
5. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(6):2028-37. [DOI] [PMID]
6. Milanese S, Grimmer K. School furniture and the user population: an anthropometric perspective. Ergonomics 2004; 47(4):416-26. [DOI] [PMID]
7. Limon S, Valinsky L, Ben-Shalom Y. Children at risk: risk factors for low back pain in the elementary school environment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29(6):697-702. [DOI] [PMID]
8. Masiero S, Carraro E, Celia A, Sarto D, Ermani M. Prevalence of nonspecific low back pain in schoolchildren aged between 13 and 15 years. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97(2):212-6. [DOI] [PMID]
9. Preedy VR. Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human form in Health and Disease. 1st ed. New York, United States: Springer-Verlag; 2012. [DOI]
10. Arefi MF, Pouya AB, Poursadeqiyan M. Investigating the match between anthropometric measures and the classroom furniture dimensions in Iranian students with health approach: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot 2021; 10:38. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Pheasant S, Haslegrave CM. Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics, and the Design of Work. 3rd ed. Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis; 2005.
12. Olsen TL, Anderson RL, Dearwater SR, Kriska AM, Cauley JA, Aaron DJ, et al. The epidemiology of low back pain in an adolescent population. Am J Public Health 1992; 82(4):606-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Manouchehri H, Moradpour P, Mououdi MA, Aga-Rafiei E. Designing Ergonomic Furniture Based on Students Anthropometry Attributes; College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran. Iran J Ergon 2020; 8(3):70-84 [DOI]
14. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Garza C, Yang H, WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes. Public Health Nutr 2006; 9(7):942-7. [DOI] [PMID]
15. McDowell MA, Fryar CD, Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2003–2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2008; (10):1-48. [PMID]
16. Salvarzi E, Choobineh A, Jahangiri M, Keshavarzi S. Facial anthropometric measurements in Iranian male workers using Digimizer version 4.1.1.0 image analysis software: a pilot study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2018; 24(4):570-6. [DOI] [PMID]
17. Ramin Sabet M, Sadeghi F, Safari M. Anthropometry and indices of Iranian workers body size to design a workstations. 1st ed. Tehran: Asar Sobhan; 2013.
18. Falahati,M, Zokaei M, Sadeghi Naeini H, Moradi G. Determination of Variables and Static Anthropometric Indicators for Classroom Chair Design. Iran Occup Health J 2013; 10(2):99.
19. Motiei Langrudi SH. A survey of height and weight of children younger than 10 living in Qazvin city. J Inflamm Dis 1997; 1(2):39-46.
20. Ershadi A. Height & weight of 6 years old pupils Kashan. J Inflamm Dis 1998; 2(2):58-64. [Article]
21. Taifa IW, Desai DA. Anthropometric measurements for ergonomic design of students’ furniture in India. Eng Sci Technol Int J 2016; 20(1):232-9. [DOI]
22. Klamklay J, Sungkhapong A, Yodpijit N, Patterson PE. Anthropometry of the southern Thai population. Int J Ind Ergon 2008; 38(1):111-8. [DOI]
23. Seyedi F, Dalfardi M, Eftekharvaghefi SH. Assessment of Accommodation of Anthropometric Dimensions with Classroom Furniture: Systematic Review Article. J Jiroft Univ Med Sci 2020; 6(2):222-33. [Article]
24. Kazemhaghighi M, Saremi M. The situation of anthropometric databank in Iran: a review study. Iran Occup Health J 2017; 14(4):102-95. [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2025 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb