Volume 12, Issue 2 (Spring 2023)                   J Occup Health Epidemiol 2023, 12(2): 69-77 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Maleki H, Amin F, Parvaz N, Kahnooji M, Sayadi A, Vazirinejad R et al . ABO Blood System Associated with Susceptibility, and Rhesus (Rh) Status Associated with Disease Severity in COVID-19 Patients, (Southeast of Iran). J Occup Health Epidemiol 2023; 12 (2) :69-77
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-630-en.html

Related article in
Google Scholar

1- M.Sc in Clinical Biochemistry, Dept. of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Physiology‐Pharmacology Research Center, Research Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.; Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
3- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
4- Assistant Prof, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
5- Professor, Dept. of Social Medicine, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. , rezavazirinejad@rums.ac.ir
6- Professor, Dept. of Immunology, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; Dept. of Immunology, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan, University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Article history
Received: 2022/08/2
Accepted: 2023/05/20
ePublished: 2023/06/28
Subject: Epidemiology
Full-Text [PDF 550 kb]   (393 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1170 Views)
Full-Text:   (96 Views)
Introduction
The SARS-CoV-2-related COVID-19 disease has affected many populations in more than 212 countries and territories [1]. SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted via respiratory droplets (particularly during coughing and sneezing) and near contact with a person-to-person. However, aerosols and fomites can also transmit the virus [2]. SARS-CoV-2 remains contagious in aerosols for several minutes or hours and on surfaces for several days [2].
The SARS-CoV-2-infected persons may be asymptomatic or express a range of clinical patterns, including mild, moderate, severe, and critical types [3]. The COVID-19 manifestations appear after an incubation stage (with a median of about 5 days) and include fever, breath shortness, dry cough, headache and dizziness, nausea and diarrhea, and loss of sense of smell and taste, in some cases, patients exhibit no specific clinical symptoms [3, 4].
The spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 binds to the cells expressing ACE2, the main receptor of SARS-CoV-2 [5]. ACE2 is expressed in many tissues, especially the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, testis and kidneys, bladder, liver, heart, and CNS [3, 5]. Old age, diabetes complications, obesity, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and tumors are the major risk factors for COVID-19 aggravation and related fatality [3, 5]. Overall, hyper-inflammatory reactions, cytokine storm, immune dysregulation, lymphopenia, massive virus replication, excessive death of host cells, coagulopathy, and lung fibrosis are among the mechanisms playing crucial roles in COVID-19 pathogenesis [6].
ABH antigens are present on the membrane of erythrocytes and many other cells, including white blood cells, platelets, and vascular endothelial cells [7]. ABO blood groups have been reported to be associated with many infectious diseases, including bacterial and parasitic infections such as Helicobacter pylori, malaria, and schistosomiasis. [8-10]. ABO blood groups have also been shown to be associated with susceptibility to major viral diseases, including enteroviruses, Ebola, influenza, and SARS [11-13]. Blood group antigens may directly act as receptors or co-receptors for viruses, bacteria, and parasites [8].
Furthermore, some blood group-related antigens can support attachment, intracellular uptake, or signal transduction during infectious diseases [10, 14-16]. Furthermore, the presence of the performed natural antibodies of blood groups may contribute to the anti-virus innate immune response [17]. Nevertheless, the precise role of ABO/Rh blood group antigens during the SARS-CoV-2 infection has not yet been elucidated.
Although there are some studies concerning the association of the ABO blood types and COVID-19, this association has not been evaluated in the southeast of Iran. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the association of the ABO/Rh blood groups with susceptibility to COVID-19 or disease severity in Rafsanjan City (a city located in the southeast of Iran, Kerman province, Iran) to clarify possible association.

Materials and Methods
Totally, a total of 524 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in this descriptive study and referred to Ali-iben-e Abitaleb Hospital, affiliated with the Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (Rafsanjan, Iran). Patients with COVID-19 infection were enrolled during March- to October of 2020. The SARS-CoV-2 infection was considered positive according to the results obtained from the real-time PCR test performed on a sample collected from the nasopharyngeal region of patients. The adult COVID-19 patients (age >18 years) with a documented ABO/Rh blood type were enrolled in the hospital records. The patients without documented ABO/Rh blood types were excluded from the study. History of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal disease, liver and kidney diseases, respiratory diseases, thyroid disease, and other diseases were screened for underlying disease.
According to the WHO guidelines, COVID-19 patients were classified into mild, moderate, and severe subgroups based on their clinical exhibitions. The mild form of COVID-19 was defined as symptoms such as mild fever, headache, dry cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, malaise, muscle pain, and anosmia. Moderate type of COVID-19 w:as char:acterized by respiratory symptoms, especially cough, and shortness of breath without signs of severe pneumonia. Severe COVID-19 was defined as serious dyspnea, hypoxia, and tachypnea [18].
To determine the normal distribution of ABO/Rh blood group types in the general population of Rafsanjan, the blood types of 7365 healthy individuals who were referred to the local blood transfusion center (for a donation of whole blood or platelets) during the same period were collected and analyzed. This investigation was evaluated and approved by a local ethical committee affiliated with the Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences and registered with an ethics code of IR.RUMS.REC.1399.191. Moreover, informed written consent was obtained from all patients.
Differences in variables were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, including χ2 and student t-test, and the P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. ORs with 95% CIs for
ABO/Rh blood types in COVID-19 patients were determined using logistic regression. The data were analyzed by a statistical SPSS software (version 22, Chicago, IL, USA). 

Table 1. Major clinical symptoms in patients with COVID-19
Clinical symptoms of COVID-19 Number (%) of Patients (n=524)
Body pain 289 (55.2%)
Headache 224(46.6%)
Weakness and fatigue 232 (44.3%)
Coughing 228 (43.5)
Fever 214 (40.8%)
Decreased sense of smell 185 (35.3%)
Decreased sense of taste 166 (31.7%)
Shortness of breath 113 (21.6%)
Gastrointestinal symptoms 113 (21.6%)
Body Trembling 110 (21%)
Sore throat 47 (9%)
Results
Clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients: As demonstrated in Table 1, the most common clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients were body pain (55.2%), headache (46.6%), weakness and fatigue (44.3%), coughing (43.5%), fever (40.8%), decreased sense of smell (35.3%), decreased sense of taste (31.7%), shortness of breath (21.6%), gastrointestinal symptoms (21.6%), body trembling (21.0%) and sore throat (9.0%).
Occupational status and previous contact of
COVID-19 patients with an infected person:
The occupational status including official employee, unemployed / housekeeper, self - employed, emeritus, and student were reported in 371 (70.8%), 60 (11.45%), 55 (10.49%), 30 (5.72%) and 8 (1.52%) of COVID-19 patients, respectively (Table 2). Concerning previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2, 225 (42.9%) of patients reported close contact with a COVID-19 patient, while 114 (21.8%) had a SARS-CoV-2-infected member in their family (Table 2).  

Table 2. Occupational status and history of exposure to a SARS-CoV-2-infected person in patients with COVID-19
Environmental parameters Situations Patients
(n=524)
Occupational status Unemployed/Housekeeper 60 (11.4%)
Student 8 (1.5%)
Employee 371 (70.8%)
Emeritus 30 (5.7%)
Self-employed 55 (10.5%)
History of exposure to a patient with COVID-19 The presence of an infected member in the family 114 (21.8%)
Contact with a COVID-19 patient 225 (42.9%)
As the first infected person in the family 100 (19.1%)
Roommate 6 (1.1%)
Colleague 70 (13.4%)
No answer 9 (1.7%)
Disease severity and related parameters in COVID-19 patients: According to disease severity, the mild, moderate, and severe forms of COVID-19 were exhibited in 288 (55.5%), 143 (27.3%), and 93 (17.7%) of the SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, respectively. The presence of underlying diseases in patients with COVID-19 was as follows: hypertension in 52 (9.9%), diabetes in 45 (8.6%), hyperlipidemia in 27 (5.2%), cardiovascular diseases in 26 (5%), respiratory diseases in 25 (4.8%), thyroid diseases in 25 (4.8%), liver and kidney diseases in 22 (4.2%), gastrointestinal diseases in 10 (1.9%) and other diseases in 24 (4.6%) (Table 3). As indicated in Table 3, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, and liver and kidney diseases showed significant association with COVID-19 severity. However, no significant association was found between the presence of the thyroid and gastrointestinal diseases with COVID-19 severity (Table 3).
Table 3. The presence and association of a history of underlying diseases with the COVID-19 severity
Underlying diseases COVID-19 severity Total patients
(n=524)
P- value
Mild (n=288) Moderate (n=143) Severe (n=93)
Hypertension 13 (4.5%) 17 (11.9%) 22 (23.7%) 52 (9.9%) 0.001
Diabetes 18 (6.2%) 11 (7.7%) 16 (17.2%) 45 (8.6%) 0.010
Hyperlipidemia 5 (1.7%) 9 (6.3%) 13 (14.0%) 27 (5.2%) 0.000
Cardiovascular diseases 11 (3.8%) 6 (4.2%) 10 (10.8%) 26 (5%) 0.039
Respiratory diseases 7 (2.4%) 10 (7.0%) 9 (9.7%) 25 (4.8%) 0.011
Thyroid diseases 13 (4.5%) 5 (3.5%) 7 (7.5%) 25 (4.8%) 0.392
Liver and kidney diseases 5 (1.7%) 8 (5.6%) 9 (9.7%) 22 (4.2%) 0.007
Gastrointestinal diseases 3 (1.04%) 4 (2.8%) 3 (3.2%) 10 (1.9%) 0.444
Other diseases 12 (4.2%) 7 (4.9%) 5 (5.4%) 24 (4.6%) 0.728
Distribution of ABO/Rh blood group types in COVID-19 and healthy groups: The distribution of the ABO/Rh blood group types in COVID-19 patients and healthy group was summarized in Table 4. The proportion of A blood group was similarly expressed in COVID-19 patients and healthy group (26.1% versus 26.2%, P=0.99). There was no significant differences between COVID-19 patients and the healthy healthy group regarding the frequencies of B and O blood group types (Table 4). The AB blood group type frequency was significantly greater in COVID-19 patients than in the healthy healthy group (11.8% versus 8.2%, P <0.004). When the A blood group was considered as a reference, the AB blood group type was related to the greater risk of COVID-19 [OR: 1.45 (1.06-1.98), P<0.02] (Table 4). The frequency of the Rh-positive blood group type was slightly higher, while the frequency Rh-negative blood group was slightly lower in COVID-19 patients in comparison with those in the healthy healthy group (Table 4).

Table 4. Distribution of the ABO/Rh blood group types in patients with COVID-19 and healthy group.
ABO/Rh blood group types Healthys
(n=7365)
Patients
(n=524)
P value OR (95% CI) P-value
A 1927 (26.2%) 137 (26.1%) 0.99 Reference ---
B 2117 (28.7%) 140 (26.8%) 0.32 0.93 (0.73-1.18) 0.93
AB 602 (8.2%) 62 (11.8%) 0.004* 1.45 (1.06-1.98) 0.02
O 2719 (36.9%) 185 (35.3%) 0.46 0.95 (0.76-1.20) 0.70
Rh positive 6474(87.9%) 464 (88.5%) 0.66 Reference 0.66
Rh negative 891(12.1%) 60 (11.5%) 0.66 1.064 (0.81-1.4)
The distribution of the ABO blood group types in COVID-19 patients and healthy group according to their Rh status was summarized in Table 5. Considering Rh status in all A, B, AB, and O blood group types, there was no significant differences between COVID-19 patients and the healthy group regarding the proportion of Rh-positive or Rh-negative individuals (Table 5).

Table 5. Distribution of the ABO blood group types in patients with COVID-19 and healthy group according to their Rh status
ABO blood group type Rh status Healthy people
(n=7365)
Patients
(n=524)
P-value
A A+ 1685 (87.4%) 121 (88.3%) 0.76
A- 242 (12.6%) 16 (11.7%)
Total 1927 (100.0%) 137 (100.0%)
B B+ 1897 (89.6%) 124 (88.6%) 0.69
B- 220 (10.4%) 16 (11.4)
Total 2117 (100.0%) 140 (100.0%)
AB AB+ 528 (87.7%) 54 (87.1%) 0.88
AB- 74 (12.3%) 8 (12.9%)
Total 602 (100.0%) 62 (100.0%)
O O+ 2364 (86.9%) 165 (89.2%) 0.37
O- 355 (13.1%) 20 (10.8%)
Total 2719 (100.0%) 185 (100.0%)
The distribution of the ABO/Rh blood group types in COVID-19 patients and the healthy group according to their gender was summarized in Table 6. Considering gender status in A, B, and O blood group types, there was no significant differences between the COVID-19 patients and healthy group regarding the frequencies of men or women. In the AB blood group type, the frequencies of the men and women in the COVID-19 patients were markedly greater than those in the healthy group. However, the differences did not show a significant level (P=0.06 and P=0.08, respectively) (Table 6). Considering gender status in Rh-positive and Rh-negative blood group types, no significant differences were detected between the COVID-19 and healthy groups regarding the frequencies of men or women (Table 6).  

Table 6. Distribution of the ABO/Rh blood group types in COVID-19 patients and healthy group according to their gender
ABO/Rh blood group type Healthy
(n=7365)
Patients
(n=524)
P-value
A Men 1870 (26.2%) 66 (27.3%) 0.72
Women 57 (23.7%) 71 (25.2%) 0.68
Total 1927 (26.2%) 137 (26.1%) 0.99
B Men 2046 (28.7%) 65 (26.9%) 0.53
Women 71 (29.5%) 75 (26.6) 0.46
Total 2117 (28.7%) 140 (26.8%) 0.32
AB Men 584 (8.2%) 28 (11.6%) 0.06
Women 18 (7.5%) 34 (12.1%) 0.08
Total 602 (8.2%) 62 (11.8%) 0.004
O Men 2624 (36.8%) 83 (34.3%) 0.42
Women 95 (39.4%) 102 (36.2%) 0.44
Total 2719 (36.9%) 185 (35.3%) 0.46
Rh positive Men 6264 (87.9%) 216 (89.3%) 0.53
Women 210 (87.1%) 248 (87.9%) 0.78
Total 6474 (87.9%) 464 (88.5%) 0.66
Rh negative Men 860 (12.1%) 26 (10.7%) 0.53
Women 31 (12.9%) 34 (12.1%) 0.78
Total 891(12.1%) 60 (11.5%) 0.66
Association of ABO/Rh blood group types and COVID-19 severity: Distribution of the ABO blood group types in patients with COVID-19 according to their disease severity was summarized in Table 7. Within the A, B, AB, or O blood group types, there was no significant difference between mild, moderate, and severe types of COVID-19 regarding the frequency of a particular blood group (Table 7).

Table 7. Distribution of the ABO blood group types in COVID-19 patients according to their disease severity
ABO blood group types COVID-19 Severity P-value
Mild Moderate Severe Total
A 77 (26.7%) 36 (25.2%) 24 (25.8%) 137 (26.1%) 0.93
B 71 (24.7%) 41 (28.7%) 28 (30.1%) 140 (26.8%) 0.62
AB 36 (12.5%) 15 (10.5%) 11 (11.8%) 62 (11.8%) 0.83
O 104 (36.1%) 51 (35.7%) 30 (32.3%) 185 (35.3%) 0.79
Total 288 (55.0%) 143 (27.3%) 93 (17.7%) 524 (100.0%) ---
The distribution of the Rh status in patients with COVID-19 according to their disease severity was summarized in Table 8. There were significant differences between mild, moderate, and severe types of COVID-19 regarding the frequency of Rh-positive or Rh-negative patients. The frequency of Rh-positive patients was significantly lower, while the frequency of Rh-negative patients was significantly greater in the severe form of the disease than those with the mild and moderate forms of COVID-19 (P<0.001) (Table 8). 

Table 8. Distribution of Rh blood group types in COVID-19 patients according to their disease severity
Rh blood group types COVID-19 Severity P-value
Mild Moderate Severe Total
Rh positive 262 (91.0%) 130 (90.9%) 72 (77.4%) 464 (88.5%) 0.001
Rh negative 26 (9.0%) 13 (9.1%) 21 (22.6%) 60 (11.5%)
Total 288 (55.0%) 143 (27.3%) 93 (17.7) 524 (100%) ---
Distribution of the ABO blood group types in patients with mild, moderate, and severe forms of COVID-19 according to their Rh status was summarized in Table 9. In the patients with A, AB, and O blood group types, there were significant differences between mild, moderate, and severe types of COVID-19 regarding the frequency of Rh-positive or Rh-negative patients. In the patients with A, AB, and O blood group types, the frequency of Rh-positive patients was lower, while the frequency of Rh-negative patients was greater in the severe form of COVID-19 than those in the mild and moderate forms (P=0.05, P<0.05, and P<0.001, respectively). In the patients with B blood group type, there was no significant differences between the mild, moderate, and severe forms of COVID-19 regarding the distribution of Rh-positive or Rh-negative patients (Table 9).

Table 9. Distribution of the ABO blood group types in patients with mild, moderate, and severe forms of COVID-19 according to their Rh status
Blood group types COVID-19 severity P-value
Mild Moderate Severe Total
A+ 72 (93.5%) 28 (77.8%) 21 (77.5%) 121 (88.3%) 0.05
A- 5 (6.5%) 8 (22.2%) 3 (12.5%) 16 (11.7%)
Total A 77 (100.0%) 36 (100.0%) 24 (100.0%) 137 (100.0%)
B+ 63 (88.7%) 38 (92.7%) 23 (82.1%) 124 (88.6%) 0.40
B- 8 (11.3%) 3 (7.3%) 5 (17.9%) 16 (11.4)
Total B 71 (100.0%) 41 (100.0%) 28 (100.0%) 140 (100.0%)
AB+ 32 (88.9%) 15 (100.0%) 7 (63.6%) 54 (87.1%) 0.05
AB- 4 (11.1) 0 (0.0%) 4 (34.6%) 8 (12.9%)
Total AB 36 (100.0%) 15 (100.0%) 11 (11.8%) 62 (100.0%)
O+ 95 (91.3%) 49 (96.1%) 21 (70.0%) 165 (89.2%) 0.001
O- 9 (8.7%) 2 (3.9%) 9 (30.0%) 20 (10.8%)
Total O 104 (100.0%) 51 (100.0%) 30 (100.0%) 185 (100.0%)
Discussion
In this study, the most common clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients were body pain, headache, weakness and fatigue, coughing, fever, decreased sense of smell, decreased sense of taste, shortness of breath, gastrointestinal symptoms, body trembling, and sore throat. The patterns of the clinical signs observed in the present study were similar to those found in other investigations [19-21]. Here, a remarkable proportion of patients reported close contact with a COVID-19 patient or had a SARS-CoV-2-infected member in their family. The mild, moderate, and severe forms of COVID-19 were exhibited in 55.5%, 27.3%, and 17.7% of the patients, respectively. The results from a large cohort from China indicated that mild or moderate forms of COVID-19 were observed in more than 80.0% of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients [22]. The presence of underlying diseases in COVID-19 patients was as follows: hypertension in 9.9%, diabetes in 8.6%, hyperlipidemia in 5.2%, cardiovascular diseases in 5.0%, respiratory diseases in 4.8%, thyroid diseases in 4.8%, liver and kidney diseases in 4.2%, gastrointestinal diseases in 1.9% and other diseases in 4.6%. Similar patterns of the presence of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, and respiratory disorders were reported in other studies [23, 24]. However, the results reported by Khoo et al. and Lui et al. indicated that about 15.0% of COVID-19 patients displayed thyroid dysfunction [25, 26].   
Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, and liver and kidney diseases showed significant association with COVID-19 severity. Indeed, greater mortality rates were reported in COVID-19 patients suffering from the mentioned underlying diseases [24]. However, no significant association was found between the presence of thyroid and gastrointestinal diseases with COVID-19 severity.
In the present study, there was also no significant differences between COVID-19 patients and the healthy group regarding the frequencies of A, B, and O blood group types. The frequency of the AB blood group was significantly higher in the COVID-19 patients than in the healthy group. The AB blood group type was also related to the greater risk of COVID-19. There are controversies regarding the relationship of the ABO blood group types with COVID-19 in different populations. The results from some studies indicated no association between the ABO blood group types with COVID-19 [27, 28]. In contrast, others demonstrated a positive relation between COVID-19 with a blood group and a negative association with the O blood group type [29-32]. Latz et al. reported that the B and AB blood group types exhibited a positive association, the O blood type displayed a negative association, and the A blood group showed no association with COVID-19 [33]. A study from Canada also indicated that the O blood group was related to a smaller risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. At the same time, COVID-19 patients with severe illness or death express higher ratios of AB and B blood groups [34].
The lower risk of SARS-CoV-1 infection in the persons with O blood group was attributed to the anti-A antibodies in these subjects inhibiting the virus attachment to its target cells. The interaction of the viral S protein with ACE2-expressing cells was prevented by natural and monoclonal anti-A antibodies in vitro [35]. A higher risk of SARS-CoV-2infection in individuals with AB blood group confirms that anti-A antibodies (and perhaps anti-B antibodies) may provide a protective line against SARS-CoV-2 infection due to their inhibitory effects. Whether A and B antigens provide further molecular patterns for SARS-CoV-2 binding needs to be clarified in more molecular investigations.
There were no significant differences between the COVID-19 patients and the healthy group regarding the frequencies of men or women in A, B, and O blood group types. A study from the UK indicated that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 outcomes were not associated with ABO blood groups in males or females [27]. However, we have observed that the frequencies of the men and women with AB blood group in the COVID-19 patients were markedly greater than those in the healthy group.  
Within the A, B, AB, or O blood group types, there was no significant difference between mild, moderate, and severe types of COVID-19 regarding the frequency of a particular blood group. Mullins et al. and Mahmud et al. also reported that ABO blood group types of the COVID-19 patients did not affect their disease severity [28, 32].
In this study, no significant differences were found between COVID-19 patients and the healthy group regarding the Rh status of individuals. However, the frequency of the individuals with the Rh-positive blood group was slightly higher in COVID-19 patients compared with those in the healthy group. However, the frequency of Rh-positive patients was significantly lower, while the frequency of Rh-negative patients was significantly greater in the severe form of the disease than those with the mild and moderate forms of COVID-19. In the patients with A, AB, and O blood group types, the frequency of Rh-positive patients was significantly lower, while the frequency of Rh-negative patients was significantly greater in the severe form of the disease than those with the mild and moderate forms of COVID-19. Thus, it seems that the Rh status did not affect the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nonetheless, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, the Rh negativity may act as an accelerating factor for COVID-19 severity. Latz et al. reported that Rh positivity was associated with greater odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection, higher risks of intubation, and a greater fatality rate [33]. Zietz et al. also reported that Rh-negative patients exhibited a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, intubation, and death [36].
Moreover, Ray et al. found that individuals with Rh-negative blood type exhibited lower susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially those with O-negative blood type [34]. However, Saify et al. reported that the Rh-negative status was associated with a greater risk of COVID-19 [37]. The discrepancy observed between our findings and studies above concerning the association of Rh status with COVID-19 severity remains to be clarified in future studies.

Conclusion
In conclusion, similar patterns of clinical symptoms were observed in COVID-19 patients. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, and liver and kidney diseases showed significant association with COVID-19 severity. ABO blood group types were not related to COVID-19 severity, while AB blood group type was positively associated with disease susceptibility. Rh status was not related to susceptibility to COVID-19, while Rh-negative status was positively associated with disease severity.

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a grant (PN: 99212) from Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References
1. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157-60. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Qu L, Li J, Ren H. COVID-19: the epidemiology and treatment. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020;81:1-9. [DOI] [PMID]
3. Jafarzadeh A, Nemati M, Saha B, Bansode YD, Jafarzadeh S. Protective Potentials of Type III Interferons in COVID-19 Patients: Lessons from Differential Properties of Type I- and III Interferons. Viral Immunol. 2020;35(5):307-20. [DOI] [PMID]
4. Jiang F, Deng L, Zhang L, Cai Y, Cheung CW, Xia Z. Review of the clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(5):1545-9. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Jafarzadeh A, Chauhan P, Saha B, Jafarzadeh S, Nemati M. Contribution of monocytes and macrophages to the local tissue inflammation and cytokine storm in COVID-19: Lessons from SARS and MERS, and potential therapeutic interventions. Life Sci. 2020;257:118102. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Jafarzadeh A, Nemati M, Jafarzadeh S. Contribution of STAT3 to the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Microbial Pathog. 2021;154:104836. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Daniels G, Reid ME. Blood groups: the past 50 years. Transfusion. 2010;50(2):281-9. [DOI] [PMID]
8. Abegaz SB. Human ABO Blood Groups and Their Associations with Different Diseases. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6629060. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Jafarzadeh A, Ahmedi-Kahanali J, Bahrami M, Taghipour Z. Seroprevalence of anti-Helicobacter pylori and anti-CagA antibodies among healthy children according to age, sex, ABO blood groups and Rh status in south-east of Iran. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2007;18:165-71. [PMID]
10. Zhang Y, Garner R, Salehi S, La Rocca M, Duncan D. Association between ABO blood types and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), genetic associations, and underlying molecular mechanisms: a literature review of 23 studies. Ann Hematol. 2021;100(5):1123-32. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Conton B, Gevao S, Sahr F, Kargbo O, Kamara P, Bah, et al. Do ABO and Rhesus blood groups affect susceptibility to, and prognosis of Ebola virus infection. J Virol Antivir Res. 2017;6(1):1. [DOI]
12. Cheng Y, Cheng G, Chui CH, Lau FY, Chan PK, Ng MH, et al. ABO blood group and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA. 2005;293(12):1450-1. [DOI] [PMID]
13. Ramani S, Giri S. Influence of histo blood group antigen expression on susceptibility to enteric viruses and vaccines. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019;32(5):445-52. [DOI] [PMID]
14. Behal R, Jain R, Behal KK, Dhole TN. Variation in the host ABO blood group may be associated with susceptibility to hepatitis C virus infection. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138(8):1096-9. [DOI] [PMID]
15. Singh BK, Leuthold MM, Hansman GS. Structural constraints on human norovirus binding to histo-blood group antigens. mSphere. 2016;1(2):e00049-16. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Liu J, Zhang S, Liu M, Wang Q, Shen H, Zhang Y. Distribution of ABO/Rh blood groups and their association with hepatitis B virus infection in 3.8 million Chinese adults: A population‐based cross‐sectional study. J Viral Hepat. 2018;25(4):401-11. [DOI] [PMID]
17. Fricke-Galindo I, Falfán-Valencia R. Genetics Insight for COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity: A Review. Front Immunol. 2021;12:622176. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Wittmer VL, Paro FM, Duarte H, Capellini VK, Barbalho-Moulim MC. Early mobilization and physical exercise in patients with COVID-19: A narrative literature review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021;43:101364. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. 19. Borges do Nascimento IJ, von Groote TC, O’Mathúna DP, Abdulazeem HM, Henderson C, Jayarajah U, et al. Clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics and outcomes of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection in humans: A systematic review and series of meta-analyses. PloS One. 2020;15:e0239235. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Struyf T, Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Leeflang MM, et al. Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID‐19 disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7): CD013665. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Qu J, Chang LK, Tang X, Du Y, Yang X, Liu X, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 and its comparison with influenza pneumonia. Acta Clin Belg. 2020;75(5):348-56. [DOI] [PMID]
22. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA.2020;323(13):1239-42. [DOI] [PMID]
23. Singh AK, Gupta R, Misra A. Comorbidities in COVID-19: Outcomes in hypertensive cohort and controversies with renin angiotensin system blockers. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):283-7. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Zaki N, Alashwal H, Ibrahim S. Association of hypertension, diabetes, stroke, cancer, kidney disease, and high-cholesterol with COVID-19 disease severity and fatality: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):1133-42. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Lui DTW, Lee CH, Chow WS, Lee ACH, Tam AR, Fong CHY, et al. Thyroid Dysfunction in Relation to Immune Profile, Disease Status, and Outcome in 191 Patients with COVID-19. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(2):e926-35. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Khoo B, Tan T, Clarke SA, Mills EG, Patel B, Modi M, et al. Thyroid Function Before, During, and After COVID-19. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(2):e803-11. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Lehrer S, Rheinstein PH. ABO blood groups, COVID-19 infection and mortality. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2021;89:102571. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Mullins J, Al-Tarbsheh AH, Chieng H, Chaukiyal P, Ghalib S, Jain E, et al. The association of ABO blood type with the risk and severity of COVID-19 infection. Am J Blood Res. 2021;11(1):53-8. [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Zhao J, Yang Y, Huang H, Li D, Gu D, Lu X, et al. Relationship between the ABO Blood Group and the COVID-19 Susceptibility. Clin Infec Dis. 2021;73(2):328-31. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Wu Y, Feng Z, Li P, Yu Q. Relationship between ABO blood group distribution and clinical characteristics in patients with COVID-19. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;509:220-3. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Abdollahi A, Mahmoudi-Aliabadi M, Mehrtash V, Jafarzadeh B, Salehi M. The Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 Vulnerability Association with ABO/Rh Blood Types. Iran J Pathol. 2020;15(3):156-60. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Mahmud R, Rassel MA, Monayem FB, Sayeed SKJB, Islam MS, Islam MM, et al. Association of ABO blood groups with presentation and outcomes of confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection: A prospective study in the largest COVID-19 dedicated hospital in Bangladesh. PloS One. 2021;16(4):e0249252. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
33. Latz CA, DeCarlo C, Boitano L, Png CYM, Patell R, Conrad MF, et al. Blood type and outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Ann Hematol. 2020;99(9):2113-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
34. Ray JG, Schull MJ, Vermeulen MJ, Park AL. Association Between ABO and Rh Blood Groups and SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Severe COVID-19 Illness : A Population-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(3):308-15. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
35. Arend P. Why blood group A individuals are at risk whereas blood group O individuals are protected from SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection: A hypothesis regarding how the virus invades the human body via ABO(H) blood group-determining carbohydrates. Immunobiology. 2021;226(3):152027. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. Zietz M, Zucker J, Tatonetti NP. Associations between blood type and COVID-19 infection, intubation, and death. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5761. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Saify K, Alborz MS, Saadat M. Susceptibility to the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is associated with ABO and Rh blood groups: a case-control study from Afghanistan. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2021;22(1):1. [DOI] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2025 CC BY 4.0 | Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb