Journal of Occupational
Health and Epidemiology
Rafsanjan university Of medical sciences
Volume 13, Issue 1 (Winter 2024)
J Occup Health Epidemiol 2024, 13(1): 61-68 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1401.169
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jafari Nodoushan M, Jafari Nodoushan R, Halvani G, Sefidkar R, Mokarami H. Association between Safety Self-Efficacy, Safety Perceived Control, and Safety Behavior in Employees of a Selected Steel Industry, Iran (2023). J Occup Health Epidemiol 2024; 13 (1) :61-68
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-784-en.html
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-784-en.html
Related article in
Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Similar articles
Mahdi Jafari Nodoushan1 
, Reza Jafari Nodoushan * 2, Gholamhossein Halvani3 , Reyhane Sefidkar4 , Hamidreza Mokarami5
, Reza Jafari Nodoushan * 2, Gholamhossein Halvani3 , Reyhane Sefidkar4 , Hamidreza Mokarami5
1- M.Sc. in Occupational Health, Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. ,jafarinodoushan@gmail.com
3- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
4- Assistant Prof., Center for Healthcare Data Modeling, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
5- Associate Prof., Dept. of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. ,
3- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
4- Assistant Prof., Center for Healthcare Data Modeling, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
5- Associate Prof., Dept. of Ergonomics, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Article history
Received: 2023/09/12
Accepted: 2023/12/23
ePublished: 2024/03/20
Accepted: 2023/12/23
ePublished: 2024/03/20
Subject:
Occupational Health
Abstract: (182 Views)
Background: Individual factors influence safety behavior, especially personality and psychological variables. Self-efficacy and perceived control are among these psychological drivers that were less addressed in the industrial environments and work safety. In this regard, the present study was conducted to investigate the association between safety self-efficacy and safety perceived control with the dimensions of safety behaviors.
Methods and Materials: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a steel industry in Yazd province during the spring of 2023. 252 employees from different occupational groups (workers, supervisors, and production managers) were included in the study. Griffin and Neal's questionnaire was used to check the safety behavior dimensions (safety compliance and safety participation). Moreover, safety self-efficacy and safety perceived control were evaluated using Proactive-Safety Role Orientation Questionnaire (PRO-SAFE). To analyze the data, correlation, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple linear regression model were used. SPSS-24 software was used to analyze data.
Results: We found a positive and significant association between psychological drivers and safety behavior. The regression model showed that with a unit increase in the safety self-efficacy score, the mean score of safety compliance, and safety participation increased by 0.36 and 0.36, respectively. Furthermore, with a unit increase in the safety perceived control score, the mean score of safety compliance and safety participation increased by 0.41 and 0.44, respectively.
Conclusion: Considering positive and significant association between psychological drivers and safety behavior, creating and promoting psychological drivers in the individuals can improve the level of safety in the workplace and reduce accidents.
Methods and Materials: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a steel industry in Yazd province during the spring of 2023. 252 employees from different occupational groups (workers, supervisors, and production managers) were included in the study. Griffin and Neal's questionnaire was used to check the safety behavior dimensions (safety compliance and safety participation). Moreover, safety self-efficacy and safety perceived control were evaluated using Proactive-Safety Role Orientation Questionnaire (PRO-SAFE). To analyze the data, correlation, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multiple linear regression model were used. SPSS-24 software was used to analyze data.
Results: We found a positive and significant association between psychological drivers and safety behavior. The regression model showed that with a unit increase in the safety self-efficacy score, the mean score of safety compliance, and safety participation increased by 0.36 and 0.36, respectively. Furthermore, with a unit increase in the safety perceived control score, the mean score of safety compliance and safety participation increased by 0.41 and 0.44, respectively.
Conclusion: Considering positive and significant association between psychological drivers and safety behavior, creating and promoting psychological drivers in the individuals can improve the level of safety in the workplace and reduce accidents.
Keywords: Safety [MeSH], Behavior [MeSH], Psychological Feedback [MeSH], Self-Efficacy [MeSH], Occupational Accidents [MeSH]
References
1. Berhan E, Pham D. Prevalence of occupational accident; and injuries and their associated factors in iron, steel and metal manufacturing industries in addis ababa. Cogent Eng. 2020;7(1):1723211. [DOI]
2. Matre D, Skogstad M, Sterud T, Nordby KC, Knardahl S, Christensen JO, et al. Safety incidents associated with extended working hours. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021;47(6):415-24. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Mutlu NG, Altuntas S, Dereli T. The evaluation of occupational accident with sequential pattern mining. Saf Sci. 2023;166:106212. [DOI]
4. Altunkaynak B. A statistical study of occupational accidents in the manufacturing industry in Turkey. Int J Ind Ergon. 2018;66:101-9. [DOI]
5. Izadi N, Aminian O, Esmaeili B. Occupational accidents in iran: Risk factors and long term trend (2007–2016). J Res Health Sci. 2019;19(2):e00448. [PMID]
6. Yousefi A, Hernandez MR. A novel methodology to measure safety level of a process plant using a system theory based method (STAMP). Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020;136:296-309. [DOI]
7. Eskandari D, Charkhand H, Jafari MJ, Mehrabi Y. Development of a leading indicator for assessing the organization's safety performance based on fuzzy AHP. Iran Occup Health. 2020;17(1):672-84. [Article]
8. Shafiei P, Jabbari M, Mirza EbrahimTehrani M. Investigation of root cause of work-related accidents in a vehicle manufacturing company using tripod-beta method. J Health Saf Work. 2021;11(2):309-26. [Article]
9. Liu X, Huang G, Huang H, Wang S, Xiao Y, Chen W. Safety climate, safety behavior, and worker injuries in the chinese manufacturing industry. Saf Sci. 2015;78:173-8. [DOI]
10. Aliabadi MM, Darvishi E, Shahidi R, Ghasemi F, Mahdinia M. Explanation and prediction of accidents using the path analysis approach in industrial units: The effect of safety performance and climate. Work. 2020;66(3):617-24. [DOI] [PMID]
11. Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(4):946-53. [DOI] [PMID]
12. Ghasemi F, Kalatpour O, Moghimbeigi A, Mohammadfam I. A neural network classifier model for forecasting safety behavior at workplaces. Iran J Health Saf Environ. 2017;4(4):835-43. [Article]
13. Caesens G, Brison N. The relationship between organizational dehumanization and safety behaviors. Saf Sci. 2023;158:105971. [DOI]
14. Malakoutikhah M, Jahangiri M, Alimohammadlou M, Faghihi SA, Kamalinia M. The factors affecting unsafe behaviors of iranian workers: A qualitative study based on grounded theory. Saf Health Work. 2021;12(3):339-45. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Rafiei S, Kalhor R, Shahsavari S, Souri S. Investigating the relationship between nurses' personality traits and their safety behaviors in qazvin hospitals: The mediating role of safety motivation. J Health Saf Work. 2021;11(4):645-60. [Article]
16. Subramaniam C, Johari J, Mashi MS, Mohamad R. The influence of safety leadership on nurses’ safety behavior: The mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. J Saf Res. 2023;84:117-28. [DOI] [PMID]
17. Neissi A, Hashemi Sheykhshaba E, Rahimi Pordanjani T, Arshadi N, Beshlideh K. Investigating personal, cognitive and organizational variables as predictors of unsafe behaviors among line workers in an industrial company. J Health Saf Work. 2013;3(2):13-26. [Article]
18. Curcuruto M, Mearns KJ, Mariani MG. Proactive role-orientation toward workplace safety: Psychological dimensions, nomological network and external validity. Saf Sci. 2016;87:144-55. [DOI]
19. Wang D, Sheng Z, Wang X, Griffin MA, Zhang Y, Wang Z. How team safety stressors affect proactive and prosocial safety behaviors: Felt safety responsibility and affective commitment as mediators. Saf Sci. 2022;147:105625. [DOI]
20. Wang X, Qiao Y, Wang D, Sheng Z, Newaz MT. Psychological contract of safety and construction worker behavior: Felt safety responsibility and safety-specific trust as mediators. J Constr Eng Manag. 2021;147(11):0002185. [DOI]
21. Homayounfar M, Fadaei Eshkiki M, Sedaghat R. The effect of safety management system practices, ethical leadership and self-efficacy on safety behaviour of workers in hard and harmful jobs in manufacturing industries of guilan province. Iran J Ergon. 2018;6(1):65-74. [DOI]
22. Jafari Nodoushan R, Halvani GH, Sefidkar R, Mokarami H, Jafari Nodoushan M. Psychometric properties of the persian version of proactive-safety role orientation questionnaire (PRO-SAFE). BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):437. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Ma F, Zhu Y, Liu L, Chen H, Liu Y. Work engagement and safety behavior of nurses in specialized cancer hospitals: The mediating role of self-efficacy. J Nurs Manag. 2023;2023:9034073. [DOI]
24. He C, Jia G, McCabe B, Chen Y, Sun J. Impact of psychological capital on construction worker safety behavior: Communication competence as a mediator. J Saf Res. 2019;71:231-41. [DOI] [PMID]
25. Curcuruto M, Parker SK, Griffin MA. Proactivity towards workplace safety improvement: An investigation of its motivational drivers and organizational outcomes. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2019;28(2):221-38. [DOI]
26. Choi B, Lee S. The psychological mechanism of construction workers’ safety participation: The social identity theory perspective. J Saf Res. 2022;82:194-206. [DOI] [PMID]
27. Curcuruto M, Griffin MA. Prosocial and proactive “safety citizenship behaviour”(SCB): The mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership. Saf Sci. 2018;104:29-38. [DOI]
28. Nykänen M, Salmela-Aro K, Tolvanen A, Vuori J. Safety self-efficacy and internal locus of control as mediators of safety motivation–randomized controlled trial (RCT) study. Saf Sci. 2019;117:330-8. [DOI]
29. Naji GMA, Isha ASN, Mohyaldinn ME, Leka S, Saleem MS, Rahman SMNBSA, et al. Impact of safety culture on safety performance; mediating role of psychosocial hazard: An integrated modelling approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8568. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Kaynak R, Toklu AT, Elci M, Toklu IT. Effects of occupational health and safety practices on organizational commitment, work alienation, and job performance: Using the pls-sem approach. Int J Bus Manag. 2016;11(5):146-66. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
