Journal of Occupational
Health and Epidemiology
Rafsanjan university Of medical sciences
Volume 14, Issue 3 (Summer 2025)
J Occup Health Epidemiol 2025, 14(3): 194-204 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.QUMS.REC.1402.159
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rezaeipour K, Zaroushani V, Amerzadeh M. Impact of Human Factors in Emergency Evacuations during Building Fires: A Systematic Review. J Occup Health Epidemiol 2025; 14 (3) :194-204
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-974-en.html
URL: http://johe.rums.ac.ir/article-1-974-en.html
Related article in
Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Similar articles
1- B.Sc. in Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Dept. of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. & Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. ,v.zaroushani@qums.ac.ir
3- Assistant Prof., Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
2- Assistant Prof., Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. & Assistant Prof., Dept. of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. ,
3- Assistant Prof., Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Article history
Received: 2024/11/20
Accepted: 2025/03/16
ePublished: 2025/09/28
Accepted: 2025/03/16
ePublished: 2025/09/28
Subject:
Occupational Health
Abstract: (167 Views)
Background: Effective emergency response programs are critical for minimizing casualties during fire incidents. This systematic review aims to identify and categorize the human factors affecting emergency evacuations in building fires, providing a comprehensive overview of current knowledge in this field.
Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was performed for English-language articles published between 2010 and 2022 across PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, following PRISMA guidelines. The initial search yielded 426 articles, of which 34 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria following rigorous screening and quality assessment. The final selection included 24 descriptive studies, seven experimental studies, two case studies, and one systematic review, with a concentration of 17 articles from China.
Results: The analysis identified six critical categories of human factors affecting emergency evacuations: demographic and physiological parameters, supportive evacuation tools, individual capabilities, stress and personal characteristics, human behavior, and emergency response plans. Notably, stress and personal characteristics emerged as the most frequently discussed factors, highlighting their substantial impact on evacuation behavior and decision-making processes.
Conclusion: This systematic review underscores the significance of these six human factors in shaping effective emergency evacuations during fire incidents. Insights from this review can inform the development of tailored evacuation strategies, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and individuals with health challenges. A multidisciplinary approach integrating psychology, sociology, and engineering perspectives is essential for ameliorating evacuation protocols, ultimately aiming to save lives and lower financial losses in emergencies.
Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was performed for English-language articles published between 2010 and 2022 across PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, following PRISMA guidelines. The initial search yielded 426 articles, of which 34 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria following rigorous screening and quality assessment. The final selection included 24 descriptive studies, seven experimental studies, two case studies, and one systematic review, with a concentration of 17 articles from China.
Results: The analysis identified six critical categories of human factors affecting emergency evacuations: demographic and physiological parameters, supportive evacuation tools, individual capabilities, stress and personal characteristics, human behavior, and emergency response plans. Notably, stress and personal characteristics emerged as the most frequently discussed factors, highlighting their substantial impact on evacuation behavior and decision-making processes.
Conclusion: This systematic review underscores the significance of these six human factors in shaping effective emergency evacuations during fire incidents. Insights from this review can inform the development of tailored evacuation strategies, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and individuals with health challenges. A multidisciplinary approach integrating psychology, sociology, and engineering perspectives is essential for ameliorating evacuation protocols, ultimately aiming to save lives and lower financial losses in emergencies.
References
1. Hall S. Fire loss in the United States. Quincy, Massachusetts, United States: National Fire Protection Association; 2023.
2. Jiang A, Mo Y, Kalasapudi VS. Status quo and challenges and future development of fire emergency evacuation research and application in built environment. J Inf Technol Constr. 2022;27:781-801. [DOI]
3. Kuligowski ED, Gwynne SM, Kinsey MJ, Hulse L. Guidance for the model user on representing human behavior in egress models. Fire technol. 2017;53(2):649-72. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Haghani M, Sarvi M. Human exit choice in crowded built environments: Investigating underlying behavioural differences between normal egress and emergency evacuations. Fire Saf J. 2016;85:1-9. [DOI]
5. Ronchi E, Nilsson D. Fire evacuation in high-rise buildings: a review of human behaviour and modelling research. Fire Sci Rev. 2013;2. [DOI]
6. Mirsaeedie L, Shamsi A. Identifying the Effective Factors on Emergency Evacuation the Buildings in the case of Fire. J Disaster Prev Manag Knowl. 2018;8(1):42-53. [URL]
7. Kobes M, Helsloot I, de Vries B, Post JG. Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review. Fire Saf J. 2010;45(1):1-11. [DOI]
8. Ding N, Chen T, Zhu Y, Lu Y. State-of-the-art high-rise building emergency evacuation behavior. Physica A Stat Mech Appl. 2021;561:125168. [DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2020.125168]
9. Satır MS, Topraklı AY. A review of evacuation of high-rise buildings. Gazi Univ J Sci Part B Art Humanit Des Plan. 2020;8(1).
10. Hawker S, Payne S, Kerr C, Hardey M, Powell J. Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(9):1284-99. [DOI] [PMID]
11. Mahdavi M, Mortazavi SB, Khavanin A, Zaroushani V, Hajizadeh R. A systematic review on active noise control technologies in the window. Iran Occup Health. 2024;20(2):134-52. [DOI]
12. Zaroushani V. Occupational safety and health and response to COVID-19 using the fourth industrial revolution technologies. J Health Saf Work. 2020;10(4):329-48. [URL]
13. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PRISMA 2009 Checklist [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://legacyfileshare.elsevier.com/promis_misc/PRISMA-2009-Checklist1.pdf
14. Deng K, Li M, Wang G, Hu X, Zhang Y, Zheng H, et al. Experimental study on panic during simulated fire evacuation using psycho-and physiological metrics. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11):6905. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Kinateder M, Warren WH, Schloss KB. What color are emergency exit signs? Egress behavior differs from verbal report. Appl Ergon. 2019;75:155-60. [DOI] [PMID]
16. Shokouhi M, Nasiriani K, Cheraghi Z, Ardalan A, Khankeh H, Fallahzadeh H, et al. Preventive measures for fire-related injuries and their risk factors in residential buildings: a systematic review. J Inj Violence Res. 2019;11(1):1-14. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Rostami R, Alaghmandan M. Performance-based design in emergency evacuation: From maneuver to simulation in school design. J Build Eng. 2021;33:101598. [DOI]
18. Almejmaj M, Meacham B, Skorinko J. The effects of cultural differences between the west and Saudi Arabia on emergency evacuation—clothing effects on walking speed. Fire Mater. 2015;39(4):353-70. [DOI]
19. Zhang X, Zhong Q, Li Y, Li W, Luo Q. Simulation of fire emergency evacuation in metro station based on cellular automata. Paper presented at: The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE); 2018 Sep 3-5; Singapore. [DOI]
20. Abu-Safieh SF. Virtual reality simulation of architectural clues’ effects on human behavior and decision making in fire emergency evacuation. In: Peacock, R., Kuligowski, E., Averill, J. (eds). Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics. Boston, United States: Springer; 2011. [DOI]
21. Wang Z, He R, Rebelo F, Vilar E, Noriega P. Human interaction with virtual reality: investigating pre-evacuation efficiency in building emergency. Virtual Reality. 2023;27(2):1039-50. [DOI]
22. Huo FZ, Song WG, Liu XD, Jiang ZG, Liew KM. Investigation of human behavior in emergent evacuation from an underground retail store. Procedia Eng. 2014;71:350-6. [DOI]
23. Lin J, Zhu R, Li N, Becerik-Gerber B. Do people follow the crowd in building emergency evacuation? A cross-cultural immersive virtual reality-based study. Adv Eng Inform. 2020;43:101040. [DOI]
24. Cao L, Lin J, Li N. A virtual reality based study of indoor fire evacuation after active or passive spatial exploration. Comput Human Behav. 2019;90:37-45. [DOI]
25. Yuan Ch, Xiaoping Z. Emergence of cooperation during an emergency evacuation. Appl Math Comput. 2018;320:485-94. [DOI]
26. Lin J, Cao L, Li N. How the completeness of spatial knowledge influences the evacuation behavior of passengers in metro stations: A VR-based experimental study. Autom Constr. 2020;113:103136. [DOI]
27. Tang G, Zhao Z, Yu J, Sun Z, Li X. Simulation-based framework for evaluating the evacuation performance of the passenger terminal building in a Ro-Pax terminal. Autom Constr. 2021;121:103445. [DOI]
28. Cirillo ENM, Muntean A. Can cooperation slow down emergency evacuations? Comptes Rendus Mecanique. 2012;340(9):625-8. [DOI]
29. Almejmaj M, Skorinko JLM, Meacham BJ. The effects of cultural differences between the us and saudi arabia on emergency evacuation—Analysis of self reported recogntion/reaction times and cognitive state. Case Stud Fire Saf. 2017;7:1-7. [DOI]
30. Zhang X, Li X, Hadjisophocleous G. A probabilistic occupant evacuation model for fire emergencies using Monte Carlo methods. Fire Saf J. 2013;58:15-24. [DOI]
31. Zhiming F, Huisheng G, Lixue J, Xiaolian L, Wei L. Human movement characteristics during emergency evacuations in a virtual environment. Fire Saf J. 2020;115:103147. [DOI]
32. Xie W, Lee EWM, Cheng Y, Shi M, Cao R, Zhang Y. Evacuation performance of individuals and social groups under different visibility conditions: Experiments and surveys. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020;47:101527. [DOI]
33. Yuan W, Tan KH. A model for simulation of crowd behaviour in the evacuation from a smoke-filled compartment. Physica A. 2011;390(23-24):4210-8. [DOI]
34. Şahin C, Rokne J, Alhajj R. Human behavior modeling for simulating evacuation of buildings during emergencies. Physica A. 2019;528:121432. [DOI]
35. Xiao-Xia GE, Wei D, Hong-Yu J. Study on the social psychology and behaviors in a subway evacuation drill in China. Procedia Eng. 2011;11:112-9. [DOI]
36. Mu HL, Wang JH, Mao ZL, Sun JH, Lo SM, Wang QS. Pre-evacuation human reactions in fires: An attribution analysis considering psychological process. Procedia Eng. 2013;52:290-6. [DOI]
37. Wang JH, Yan WY, Zhi YR, Jiang JC. Investigation of the panic psychology and behaviors of evacuation crowds in subway emergencies. Procedia Eng. 2016;135:128-37. [DOI]
38. Lovreglio R, Fonzone A, Dell’Olio L, Borri D, Ibeas A. The role of herding behaviour in exit choice during evacuation. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;160:390-9. [DOI]
39. Mao Y, Fan Z, Zhao J, Zhang Q, He W. An emotional contagion based simulation for emergency evacuation peer behavior decision. Simul Model Pract Theory. 2019;96:101936. [DOI]
40. Shiwakoti N, Tay R, Stasinopoulos P, Woolley PJ. Likely behaviours of passengers under emergency evacuation in train station. Saf Sci. 2017;91:40-8. [DOI]
41. Shuaib MM. Incorporating intelligence for typical evacuation under the threat of fire spreading. Saf Sci. 2018;106:1-9. [DOI]
42. Vaiciulyte S, Hulse LM, Veeraswamy A, Galea ER. Cross-cultural comparison of behavioural itinerary actions and times in wildfire evacuations. Saf Sci. 2021;135:105122. [DOI]
43. Cao RF, Lee EWM, Yuen ACY, Chan QN, Xie W, Shi M, et al. Development of an evacuation model considering the impact of stress variation on evacuees under fire emergency. Saf Sci. 2021;138:105232. [DOI]
44. Fu M, Liu R, Zhang Y. Why do people make risky decisions during a fire evacuation? Study on the effect of smoke level, individual risk preference, and neighbor behavior. Saf Sci. 2021;140:105245. [DOI]
45. Liu Y, Yu J, Yin Q, Sun C, Sun A. Impacts of human factors on evacuation performance in university gymnasiums. Physica A. 2021;582:126236. [DOI]
46. Fang W. Application of fire emergency lighting and evacuation instructions in buildings. In: Ross D, Editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management, Finance and Social Sciences Research (MFSSR 2019); 2019 2-4 Aug; Lyon, France.
47. Mirahadi F, McCabe BY. EvacuSafe: A real-time model for building evacuation based on Dijkstra's algorithm. J Build Eng. 2021;34:101687. [DOI]
48. Ma G, Wu Z. BIM-based building fire emergency management: Combining building users' behavior decisions. Autom Constr. 2020;109:102975. [DOI]
49. Liu Z, Wang W, Liu P. Dynamic consensus of large group emergency decision-making under dual-trust relationship-based social network. Inf Sci. 2022;615:58-89. [DOI]
50. Guo Y, Zhu J, Wang Y, Chai J, Li W, Fu L, et al. A virtual reality simulation method for crowd evacuation in a multiexit indoor fire environment. ISPRS Int J Geoinf. 2020;9(12):750. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
