Introduction
Overtime has become a common practice in developed nations, but it directly affects workers' physical health and lifestyle [1-3]. Overtime refers to working hours beyond a predefined threshold that triggers the payment of an overtime premium [4]. It increases stress levels and reduces leisure, family, and work recovery time [1, 2]. European studies show that almost 17% of workers report working overtime every week, with Sweden having a percentage of nearly 30% [5]. About 22% of workers still work more than 48 hours per week. The negative impact of overtime goes beyond physical well-being and can also affect mental health, leading to sleep disorders, anxiety, stress, depression, and chronic fatigue [3, 6, 7].
Over time, affecting sleep time and reducing sleep duration can lead to stress and depression. As a result of reduced sleep time, occupational fatigue is not resolved and increases depressive symptoms. Job fatigue, stress, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality can have mutual effects and act as a two-way cycle [8].
In Japan, the number of workers experiencing cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and work-related mental disorders has tripled over the past decade [5]. Recent research highlights that long working hours are linked to a higher risk of depression in Asian countries, surpassing the rates observed in European countries [9]. It is important to note that the likelihood of encountering occupational health problems increased by 24.3%, with mental health issues being more common than physical health problems [3].
Working long hours and overtime can cause sleep disorders that affect a person's health and lead to reduced performance, disruptions in the body's natural rhythms, and impaired cognitive function [3, 10, 11]. The impact on mental health is influenced by several factors, including conflict between work and family life, burnout, increased cortisol levels, and alcohol abuse, all of which contribute to the development of sleep disorders [5, 6, 10, 12].
Lack of independence in determining working hours in shift work can affect employees' health and performance [5]. Sleep disorders can lead to higher rates of absenteeism, reduced job performance, and diminished quality of life [5]. Additionally, sleep disorders can increase the use of the healthcare system and make workers more prone to accidents [5, 13]. The impact of nighttime sleep on the recovery and restoration of mental and physical processes further emphasizes its importance in maintaining overall physical and psychological health [14].
Organizational constraints, job dissatisfaction, and frustration contribute to increased employee stress. Research on employee welfare has shown that overtime causes stress [15, 16]. Additionally, considering that overtime work increases exposure to harmful chemicals and other potential health risks, it also impacts the mental health of employees, making it a subject worthy of further research [10].
Insufficient sleep, long working hours, and heavy workloads increase worker fatigue [17, 18]. Previous studies have shown that overtime and long working hours can result in a high workload and increased fatigue [19]. In addition, inadequate rest for workers during shifts and poor planning of activities can lead to overload and, consequently, increased fatigue, possibly even leading to chronic fatigue [20, 21].
Many organizations and factories in China have reported health-related problems due to long working hours [22]. Overall, the findings suggest that long working hours adversely affect health [3]. Despite the importance of long working hours, apart from the research conducted by Sparks and Cooper [23], who discovered a slightly positive correlation between various health syndromes and long working hours, Kapo Wong's [3] research showed that employees who work long hours are vulnerable to various types of occupational health problems. There has been little follow-up research to investigate the effects of overtime on mental health and sleep quality in an interventional way.
It is considered that one of the negative effects of rotating shifts due to hormonal changes is the reduction of sleep quality, which can lead to fatigue, stress, anxiety, and depression among shift workers. Overtime or long working hours decrease rest time or sleep duration and subsequently reduce sleep quality [6, 24]. Therefore, it is necessary to implement strategies to address sleep problems and alleviate fatigue, stress, anxiety, and depression among industrial shift workers.
Due to limited research on overtime among rotating shift workers in the industry and the lack of comprehensive investigation into its impact on sleep quality, occupational fatigue, stress, anxiety, and depression, it is necessary to conduct this study. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of overtime on sleep quality, occupational fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress among rotational shift workers in the food industry. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing valuable insights into effectively managing overtime and work shifts to enhance industrial workers' overall health and wellness.
The hypotheses are as follows: 1. Sleep quality differs among rotating shift workers before and after overtime. 2. The levels of stress, anxiety, and depression experienced by rotating shift workers change after overtime. 3. Occupational fatigue in rotating shift workers increases after overtime.
Materials and Methods
This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on rotating shift workers in Iran’s food industry in 2022. The study was approved by the University of Medical Sciences and participants completed a consent form before the study began.
Out of the 102 workers suggested for overtime, all selected through the census, 17 were excluded due to leaving their jobs or unwillingness to participate. This left 85 workers, all of whom were shift workers operating in three forward rotating shifts that changed weekly. Workers were included based on the following entry criteria: more than two months of shift experience [10], full-time workers [6], and working more than 48 hours per week [5].
First, a demographic information questionnaire was distributed to 102 workers to collect data and meet the inclusion criteria. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER-15) questionnaire were administered to 85 rotating shift workers in a self-report format in the presence of the researcher, taking in approximately 20 minutes to complete. Before filling out the questionnaires, the workers explained the research objectives. The researcher guided the workers and answered any questions to ensure accurate and complete responses. The factory under study added four overtime hours to the daily work schedule for two months. After two months of overtime, the workers completed the questionnaires again. This allowed for a comparison of sleep quality, stress, anxiety, depression, and job fatigue of all workers who worked overtime and were willing to participate before and after the overtime period. The control group in the study consisted of the same workers before the overtime period.
PSQI Questionnaire: The PSQI evaluates sleep quality over the past month, considering subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime dysfunction. A score of 5 or higher indicates a sleep disorder [25]. The subscales of sleep latency, sleep duration, and sleep efficiency were calculated from questions one to four of the questionnaire, where participants reported their answers in hourly units.
In Farahi's study, the internal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.77, indicating acceptable reliability. Furthermore, the validity of the questionnaire was assessed by comparing the PSQI global score with high and low scores on the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), resulting in a correlation coefficient of 0.54. This suggests a satisfactory correlation between the two instruments. These findings confirm that the Persian version of the PSQI is a reliable and valid tool [26-28].
Offer-15 Questionnaire: The OFER-15 questionnaire was used to evaluate the severity of occupational fatigue. This questionnaire consists of items that are rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Fatigue is evaluated across three dimensions: acute fatigue (5 questions), chronic fatigue due to work (6 questions), and recovery between shifts (4 questions scored in reverse). The total score is divided into three levels: low (score below 23.33), medium (score between 23.33 and 60), and high
(score above 60) [29].
In a study involving 581 hospital nurses, Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the OFER-15 questionnaire dimensions ranged from 0.81 to 0.86, indicating suitable internal consistency. Furthermore, Feng et al. confirmed the construct validity of the three factors mentioned in this questionnaire, further validating its reliability and effectiveness [29].
DASS-21 Questionnaire: The DASS-21 questionnaire was used to evaluate the severity of stress, anxiety, and depression. The final score for each scale is calculated by summing the total scores of 7 questions related to that scale and then multiplying by 2. Each item is rated on a four-point (0-3) Likert scale, leading to a possible final score ranging from 0 to 21 for DASS. Higher scores indicate elevated levels of stress, depression, and anxiety.
Sahibi et al.'s study revealed internal consistency within the DASS-21 scales, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.77 for depression, 0.79 for anxiety, and 0.78 for stress. To assess the validity of the DASS-21, the study simultaneously administered the Beck Depression, Zang Anxiety, and Perceived Stress questionnaires. The resulting correlation coefficients for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales were 0.70, 0.67, and 0.49, respectively, all of which were statistically significant at p<0.001[30].
A one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the data. To compare the DASS, PSQI, and OFER-15 before and after overtime, McNemar, Paired-Sample T-Test, and Wilcoxon tests were conducted using SPSS version 23 software.
Results
The results showed that the average age of the workers was 35.40 ± 6.57 years, with an average of 7.13±6.47 years of experience. Approximately 77% of the participants were married, and over half had a diploma. Additional information can be found in Table 1.
Fig. 1 displays the levels of sleep quality (good and poor), while Figure 2 illustrates the level of occupational fatigue (low, medium, and high) among workers before and after overtime work.
Table 1. Demographic information of shift worker participants in the study (n=85)
Quantitative information |
Qualitative information |
Variable |
Mean ± SD |
Variable |
Classification |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Age (year) |
35.4 ± 6.5 |
Marital status |
Single |
19 |
22.4 |
Height (cm) |
174.2±7.5 |
Married |
66 |
77.6 |
Weight (kg) |
78.8 ±14.0 |
Level of education |
Secondary education |
27 |
31.8 |
|
|
Diploma |
45 |
52.9 |
|
|
More than Diploma |
28 |
15.3 |
.jpg)
Fig. 1. The percentage of the PSQI category (qualitative) among participating workers before and after overtime work (n=85)
Data regarding the frequency and percentages of the subscales of the PSQI before and after overtime work are presented in Table 2. Table 2 shows that the subscales of subjective sleep quality (15.3%), sleep duration (37.6%), sleep efficiency (9.5%), sleep disturbances (14.1%), use of sleeping medications (3.5%), and daytime dysfunction (5.8%) all increased in categories of relatively poor and very poor after overtime work compared to before it.
Table 2 also indicates that the quality of sleep (c2=11.02, p<0.01), and subscales including sleep duration (z=-4.62, p<0.01), sleep efficiency (z=-2.29, p<0.05), sleep disturbances (z=-3, p<0.01), and use of sleeping medications (z=-1.89, p<0.01), have a statistically significant relationship after overtime work compared to before it, based on the McNemar test and the Wilcoxon test.
The frequency and percentage of subscales of the DASS-21 among workers who participated in the study are shown in Table 3. According to the results in Table 3, the levels of stress, anxiety, and depression following overtime in the normal category decreased by 34.6%, 23.6%, and 17.7%, respectively. Conversely, in the moderate to extremely severe categories, they increased by 23.3%, 28.2%, and 23.5%, respectively.
Stress (z=-4.52, p<0.01), anxiety (z=-4.47, p<0.01), and depression (z=-4.45, p<0.01) after overtime were found to be statistically significant. This indicates the impact of overtime on the deterioration of DASS (see Table 3).
.jpg)
Fig. 2. The percentage of the OFER-15 category (qualitative) among participating workers before and after overtime work (n=85)
Table 2. The frequency and percentage of subscales of the PSQI (quality) and comparison of the results of its before and after overtime work among shift workers (n=85) based on Wilcoxon / McNemar tests
Subscales of the PSQI |
|
|
Variables |
Category |
Before overtime work |
After overtime work |
Z |
P |
Frequency |
Percent |
Frequency |
Percent |
Subjective sleep quality
|
Very good |
10 |
11.8 |
8 |
9.4 |
-1.58 |
0.11 |
Fair good |
47 |
55.3 |
36 |
42.4 |
Relatively poor |
20 |
23.5 |
28 |
32.9 |
Very poor |
8 |
9.4 |
13 |
15.3 |
Sleep latency
|
Very good |
21 |
24.7 |
18 |
21.2 |
-0.05 |
0.95 |
Fair good |
41 |
48.2 |
46 |
54.1 |
Relatively poor |
18 |
21.2 |
18 |
21.2 |
Very poor |
5 |
5.9 |
3 |
3.5 |
Sleep duration
|
Very good |
37 |
43.5 |
14 |
16.5 |
-4.62 |
0.00** |
Fair good |
34 |
40.0 |
25 |
29.4 |
Relatively poor |
9 |
10.6 |
29 |
34.1 |
Very poor |
5 |
5.9 |
17 |
20.0 |
Sleep efficiency
|
Very good |
73 |
85.9 |
65 |
76.5 |
-2.29 |
0.02* |
Fair good |
12 |
14.1 |
12 |
14.1 |
Relatively poor |
0 |
0 |
6 |
7.1 |
Very poor |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2.4 |
Sleep disturbances
|
Very good |
3 |
3.5 |
0 |
0 |
-3.00 |
0.00** |
Fair good |
74 |
87.1 |
65 |
76.5 |
Relatively poor |
8 |
9.4 |
20 |
23.5 |
Very poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Use of sleeping medications
|
Very good |
85 |
100 |
81 |
95.3 |
-1.89 |
0.05* |
Fair good |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1.2 |
Relatively poor |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3.5 |
Very poor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Daytime dysfunction |
Very good |
28 |
32.9 |
16 |
18.8 |
-1.29 |
0.19 |
Fair good |
33 |
38.8 |
40 |
47.1 |
Relatively poor |
19 |
22.4 |
28 |
32.9 |
Very poor |
5 |
5.9 |
1 |
1.2 |
PSQI |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
Chi- square |
P |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
11.02 |
0.00** |
*P-value <0.05 **P-value <0.01
Table 3. The frequency and percentage of subscales of the DASS-21 (quality) and comparison of the results of its before and after overtime work among shift workers (n=85) based on Wilcoxon tests
Subscales of the DASS-21 |
|
|
Variables |
Category |
Before overtime work |
After overtime work |
Z |
P |
Frequency |
Percent |
Frequency |
Percent |
Stress |
Normal |
68 |
81.7 |
40 |
47.1 |
-4.52 |
0.00** |
Mild |
9 |
9.8 |
18 |
21.2 |
Moderate |
4 |
4.9 |
19 |
22.4 |
Severe |
4 |
3.7 |
6 |
7.1 |
Extremely severe |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2.4 |
Anxiety |
Normal |
36 |
42.4 |
16 |
18.8 |
-4.47 |
0.00** |
Mild |
16 |
18.8 |
12 |
14.1 |
Moderate |
28 |
32.9 |
38 |
44.7 |
Severe |
4 |
4.7 |
16 |
18.8 |
Extremely severe |
1 |
1.2 |
3 |
3.5 |
Depression |
Normal |
35 |
41.2 |
20 |
23.5 |
-4.45 |
0.00** |
Mild |
28 |
32.9 |
23 |
27.1 |
Moderate |
18 |
21.2 |
35 |
41.2 |
Severe |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.7 |
Extremely severe |
1 |
1.2 |
3 |
3.5 |
*P-value <0.05 **P-value <0.01
The results of the mean and standard deviation of the subscales of the OFER-15 among workers who participated in the study are presented in Table 4. According to Table 4, chronic and acute fatigue as well as inter-shift recovery after overtime work, increased compared to before.
In addition, occupational fatigue (z=-4.71, p<0.01) and
its subscales, such as acute fatigue (t=-3.98, p<0.01), chronic fatigue (t=-7.79, p<0.01), and inter-shift recovery (z=-3.47, p<0.01) significantly increased after overtime compared to before. This was determined through a Paired-Sample T-test and Wilcoxon test analysis (see Table 4).
Table 4. Mean and standard deviation of the subscales of the OFER-15 and comparison of the results of its before and after overtime work among shift workers (n=85) based on Paired-sample-test / Wilcoxon tests
Subscales of the OFER-15 |
|
|
Variables |
Before overtime work |
After overtime work |
t/z |
P |
Mean |